From: carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de
To: andreu.montiel@technica-enginnering.de
Cc: carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de,
Andreu Montiel <Andreu.Montiel@technica-engineering.de>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v3] macsec: MACsec SCI assignment for ES = 0
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 14:33:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250604123407.2795263-1-carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de> (raw)
From: Carlos Fernandez <carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de>
According to 802.1AE standard, when ES and SC flags in TCI are zero,
used SCI should be the current active SC_RX. Current code uses the
header MAC address. Without this patch, when ES flag is 0 (using a
bridge or switch), header MAC will not fit the SCI and MACSec frames
will be discarted.
Fixes: c09440f7dcb3 ("macsec: introduce IEEE 802.1AE driver")
Co-developed-by: Andreu Montiel <Andreu.Montiel@technica-engineering.de>
Signed-off-by: Andreu Montiel <Andreu.Montiel@technica-engineering.de>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Fernandez <carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de>
---
v3:
* Wrong drop frame afer macsec_frame_sci
* Wrong Fixes tag in message
v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20250604113213.2595524-1-carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de/
* Active sci lookup logic in a separate helper.
* Unnecessary loops avoided.
* Check RXSC is exactly one for lower device.
* Drops frame in case of error.
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20250529124455.2761783-1-carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de/
drivers/net/macsec.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c
index 3d315e30ee47..7edbe76b5455 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c
@@ -247,15 +247,39 @@ static sci_t make_sci(const u8 *addr, __be16 port)
return sci;
}
-static sci_t macsec_frame_sci(struct macsec_eth_header *hdr, bool sci_present)
+static sci_t macsec_active_sci(struct macsec_secy *secy)
{
- sci_t sci;
+ struct macsec_rx_sc *rx_sc = rcu_dereference_bh(secy->rx_sc);
+
+ /* Case single RX SC */
+ if (rx_sc && !rcu_dereference_bh(rx_sc->next))
+ return (rx_sc->active) ? rx_sc->sci : 0;
+ /* Case no RX SC or multiple */
+ else
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static sci_t macsec_frame_sci(struct macsec_eth_header *hdr, bool sci_present,
+ struct macsec_rxh_data *rxd)
+{
+ struct macsec_dev *macsec;
+ sci_t sci = 0;
- if (sci_present)
+ /* SC = 1 */
+ if (sci_present) {
memcpy(&sci, hdr->secure_channel_id,
sizeof(hdr->secure_channel_id));
- else
+ /* SC = 0; ES = 0 */
+ } else if ((!(hdr->tci_an & (MACSEC_TCI_ES | MACSEC_TCI_SC))) &&
+ (list_is_singular(&rxd->secys))) {
+ /* Only one SECY should exist on this scenario */
+ macsec = list_first_or_null_rcu(&rxd->secys, struct macsec_dev,
+ secys);
+ if (macsec)
+ return macsec_active_sci(&macsec->secy);
+ } else {
sci = make_sci(hdr->eth.h_source, MACSEC_PORT_ES);
+ }
return sci;
}
@@ -1109,7 +1133,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t macsec_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
struct macsec_rxh_data *rxd;
struct macsec_dev *macsec;
unsigned int len;
- sci_t sci;
+ sci_t sci = 0;
u32 hdr_pn;
bool cbit;
struct pcpu_rx_sc_stats *rxsc_stats;
@@ -1156,11 +1180,14 @@ static rx_handler_result_t macsec_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
macsec_skb_cb(skb)->has_sci = !!(hdr->tci_an & MACSEC_TCI_SC);
macsec_skb_cb(skb)->assoc_num = hdr->tci_an & MACSEC_AN_MASK;
- sci = macsec_frame_sci(hdr, macsec_skb_cb(skb)->has_sci);
rcu_read_lock();
rxd = macsec_data_rcu(skb->dev);
+ sci = macsec_frame_sci(hdr, macsec_skb_cb(skb)->has_sci, rxd);
+ if (!sci)
+ goto drop_nosc;
+
list_for_each_entry_rcu(macsec, &rxd->secys, secys) {
struct macsec_rx_sc *sc = find_rx_sc(&macsec->secy, sci);
@@ -1283,6 +1310,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t macsec_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
macsec_rxsa_put(rx_sa);
drop_nosa:
macsec_rxsc_put(rx_sc);
+drop_nosc:
rcu_read_unlock();
drop_direct:
kfree_skb(skb);
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-04 12:33 carlos.fernandez [this message]
2025-06-05 5:23 ` [PATCH net v3] macsec: MACsec SCI assignment for ES = 0 Subbaraya Sundeep
2025-06-05 13:17 ` [PATCH net] " Carlos Fernandez
2025-06-05 13:21 ` [PATCH net v3] " Carlos Fernandez
2025-06-06 7:20 ` Subbaraya Sundeep
2025-06-06 13:14 ` Simon Horman
2025-06-09 6:53 ` Carlos Fernandez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250604123407.2795263-1-carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de \
--to=carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de \
--cc=Andreu.Montiel@technica-engineering.de \
--cc=andreu.montiel@technica-enginnering.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox