From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next v1 1/5] xfrm: delay initialization of offload path till its actually requested
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:16:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250605141624.GG7435@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEGW_5HfPqU1rFjl@krikkit>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:09:19PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think we need to revert this patch. It causes a severe performance
> regression for SW IPsec (around 40-50%).
>
> 2025-02-19, 15:50:57 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > XFRM offload path is probed even if offload isn't needed at all. Let's
> > make sure that x->type_offload pointer stays NULL for such path to
> > reduce ambiguity.
>
> x->type_offload is used for GRO with SW IPsec, not just for HW offload.
Thanks for the report, can you please try the following fix?
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index a21e276dbe447..e45a275fca26d 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ struct xfrm_type_offload {
int xfrm_register_type_offload(const struct xfrm_type_offload *type, unsigned short family);
void xfrm_unregister_type_offload(const struct xfrm_type_offload *type, unsigned short family);
-void xfrm_set_type_offload(struct xfrm_state *x);
+void xfrm_set_type_offload(struct xfrm_state *x, bool try_load);
static inline void xfrm_unset_type_offload(struct xfrm_state *x)
{
if (!x->type_offload)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index 81fd486b5e566..d2819baea414f 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ int xfrm_dev_state_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_state *x,
return -EINVAL;
}
- xfrm_set_type_offload(x);
if (!x->type_offload) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Type doesn't support offload");
dev_put(dev);
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 203b585c2ae28..2da7281f8344b 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -424,11 +424,10 @@ void xfrm_unregister_type_offload(const struct xfrm_type_offload *type,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_unregister_type_offload);
-void xfrm_set_type_offload(struct xfrm_state *x)
+void xfrm_set_type_offload(struct xfrm_state *x, bool try_load)
{
const struct xfrm_type_offload *type = NULL;
struct xfrm_state_afinfo *afinfo;
- bool try_load = true;
retry:
afinfo = xfrm_state_get_afinfo(x->props.family);
@@ -607,6 +606,7 @@ static void ___xfrm_state_destroy(struct xfrm_state *x)
kfree(x->coaddr);
kfree(x->replay_esn);
kfree(x->preplay_esn);
+ xfrm_unset_type_offload(x);
if (x->type) {
x->type->destructor(x);
xfrm_put_type(x->type);
@@ -780,8 +780,6 @@ void xfrm_dev_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
struct xfrm_dev_offload *xso = &x->xso;
struct net_device *dev = READ_ONCE(xso->dev);
- xfrm_unset_type_offload(x);
-
if (dev && dev->xfrmdev_ops) {
spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_dev_gc_lock);
if (!hlist_unhashed(&x->dev_gclist))
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 59f258daf8305..1db18f470f429 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -977,6 +977,7 @@ static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_construct(struct net *net,
/* override default values from above */
xfrm_update_ae_params(x, attrs, 0);
+ xfrm_set_type_offload(x, attrs[XFRMA_OFFLOAD_DEV]);
/* configure the hardware if offload is requested */
if (attrs[XFRMA_OFFLOAD_DEV]) {
err = xfrm_dev_state_add(net, x,
>
> --
> Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-05 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 13:50 [PATCH ipsec-next v1 0/5] Support PMTU in tunnel mode for packet offload Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-19 13:50 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v1 1/5] xfrm: delay initialization of offload path till its actually requested Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-05 13:09 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-06-05 14:16 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-06-06 15:12 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-06-06 17:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-19 13:50 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v1 2/5] xfrm: simplify SA initialization routine Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-19 13:50 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v1 3/5] xfrm: rely on XFRM offload Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-19 13:51 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v1 4/5] xfrm: provide common xdo_dev_offload_ok callback implementation Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-19 13:51 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v1 5/5] xfrm: check for PMTU in tunnel mode for packet offload Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-25 8:57 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v1 0/5] Support " Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250605141624.GG7435@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox