From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, sockmap: Fix psock incorrectly pointing to sk
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 21:20:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250609042024.ta4fuiogxxklolst@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250609025908.79331-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
On 2025-06-09 10:59:08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> We observed an issue from the latest selftest: sockmap_redir where
> sk_psock(psock->sk) != psock in the backlog. The root cause is the special
> behavior in sockmap_redir - it frequently performs map_update() and
> map_delete() on the same socket. During map_update(), we create a new
> psock and during map_delete(), we eventually free the psock via rcu_work
> in sk_psock_drop(). However, pending workqueues might still exist and not
> be processed yet. If users immediately perform another map_update(), a new
> psock will be allocated for the same sk, resulting in two psocks pointing
> to the same sk.
>
> When the pending workqueue is later triggered, it uses the old psock to
> access sk for I/O operations, which is incorrect.
[...]
>
> Note: We cannot call cancel_delayed_work_sync() in map_delete() since this
> might be invoked in BPF context by BPF helper, and the function may sleep.
>
> Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
>
> ---
> V1->V2: Use existing flag instead of adding new one.
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250605142448.3llri3w7wbclfxwc@gmail.com/
>
> Thanks to Michal Luczaj for providing the sockmap_redir test case, which
> indeed covers almost all sockmap forwarding paths.
> ---
> net/core/skmsg.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 2:59 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, sockmap: Fix psock incorrectly pointing to sk Jiayuan Chen
2025-06-09 4:20 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2025-06-10 17:54 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250609042024.ta4fuiogxxklolst@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).