From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
shuah@kernel.org, willemb@google.com, matttbe@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] selftests/net: packetdrill: more xfail changes
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 17:00:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610000001.1970934-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
Most of the packetdrill tests have not flaked once last week.
Add the few which did to the XFAIL list.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: shuah@kernel.org
CC: willemb@google.com
CC: matttbe@kernel.org
CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Every time I sit down to add more I plan to just XFAIL all of packetdrill
on slow machines, but then I convince myself otherwise. One last time?
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ksft_runner.sh | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ksft_runner.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ksft_runner.sh
index ef8b25a606d8..c5b01e1bd4c7 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ksft_runner.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/ksft_runner.sh
@@ -39,11 +39,15 @@ if [[ -n "${KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW}" ]]; then
# xfail tests that are known flaky with dbg config, not fixable.
# still run them for coverage (and expect 100% pass without dbg).
declare -ar xfail_list=(
+ "tcp_blocking_blocking-connect.pkt"
+ "tcp_blocking_blocking-read.pkt"
"tcp_eor_no-coalesce-retrans.pkt"
"tcp_fast_recovery_prr-ss.*.pkt"
+ "tcp_sack_sack-route-refresh-ip-tos.pkt"
"tcp_slow_start_slow-start-after-win-update.pkt"
"tcp_timestamping.*.pkt"
"tcp_user_timeout_user-timeout-probe.pkt"
+ "tcp_zerocopy_cl.*.pkt"
"tcp_zerocopy_epoll_.*.pkt"
"tcp_tcp_info_tcp-info-.*-limited.pkt"
)
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 0:00 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-06-10 8:47 ` [PATCH net-next] selftests/net: packetdrill: more xfail changes Matthieu Baerts
2025-06-10 13:20 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-06-11 1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250610000001.1970934-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).