From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6DF1898E8 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 20:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750104791; cv=none; b=HG8bWT5tVjO1v7isBLTPH8svoevLH5dBUh5aOkg7e03Twspfg70HfRapLrtd2GG6jjKZ2C3A8ZHnQ8fh6hMg63ArDLEliY2F5+ZnASC3xbWEWY0nqdyQZfPlqGEFnZu+SJBkb7zBBlS6wiClNhWMXseP/ud4P50lDY/pjYgU5Js= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750104791; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nlh8J7Qun1pDJlyZjl8w8zo9XjfixAWLTNiff0nzJ6o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Or2T2hkjumNa8x1p3yGicWz4CtwFkwl3RwjT3H2rEwpO8SGbeTKEqAyO1nE/uBHD3TUGA8MoAV/EqrCueoZVi+JmbW084LmOwATBpxtsfKJ/FUzmyXO/hq0WYtPvgbqjX68s8yKDpWXnyuSfaYS6xEZHHeYWF3LfLuWRow9q2mc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tdlBqKzH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tdlBqKzH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DD91C4CEEA; Mon, 16 Jun 2025 20:13:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750104791; bh=nlh8J7Qun1pDJlyZjl8w8zo9XjfixAWLTNiff0nzJ6o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tdlBqKzHHyiLzvA9VxJKqnHWDxeqH2DlZc/v1CRbH9OhPFC0jgw739L+hKnDKPWqN +QEdukHcRTm7VmeZ4MP8VZ14p7LXm/Z71lQ8RBPPqiyg73qi/MywZNonQKydGq1aYt yN8on5VQwcnCbQLSOs5oIzXu2d0j42EM9tRMzog/Nb7M25hT8b0YIRRkExNTPZVnN/ JwFFAljKyjspFZimjcySdZ6vrqx2KgGzPrys0R4FPC399IZ5H4a8ZiJNO3Jbwf/kaj VMGCP7aj1JoM7423F1Jtg7Kap+u1nRaMlMdSdygj6cIBl/UCAOJqt+O38w9QwltdKf rvKgYgLpMnDYg== Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:13:10 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Wei Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Kuniyuki Iwashima , "David S. Miller" , David Ahern , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 3/4] selftests: net: add test for passive TFO socket NAPI ID Message-ID: <20250616131310.61c99775@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250616185456.2644238-4-dw@davidwei.uk> References: <20250616185456.2644238-1-dw@davidwei.uk> <20250616185456.2644238-4-dw@davidwei.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:54:55 -0700 David Wei wrote: > Add a test that checks that the NAPI ID of a passive TFO socket is valid > i.e. not zero. Could you run shellcheck and make sure none of the warnings are legit? -- pw-bot: cr