From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93AB8284687; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750242842; cv=none; b=GFcuvCyk1IAFUUvsrmKS1VPZ+7UBg8AJHbtK2kD5K5BELU+HwdLEKy+QQXzZHQReBmsd86TDQvme19SA1OX1ES8J/JC83LWrAFR7vsJgISlExjNwraTTpMGygD8AS2RRjlShuxqRbjbtecT0pIv0qqFiQY73WbVlw8JsJ2lk+g8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750242842; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9f+ncWU/Z9cZ5BuK9I51GBaZ/Ti54fUCxV8DLs5s288=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lCB/ocgEP9Ti1xy+4/RLKidZj8wsScKLhBCl/9wET+ryzzZ0bJREP5RE87V50chaCAiF2PIAUAGyY67lFqNXjePErYHh6uLJg6acuakTZOMfT0H9MzRMRDlAYPOi6eqxr5uNfzRWfClzUqWqz9YqAkwzRRsl4wpvY7icbOq9muE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ouSDihnf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ouSDihnf" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F32EC4CEE7; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 10:34:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750242842; bh=9f+ncWU/Z9cZ5BuK9I51GBaZ/Ti54fUCxV8DLs5s288=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ouSDihnfm6VK+p96sz+Ep1KNgPVNzEPSyW6fdagJdLl3jt6D53u2DFWp6X5DdGn4G cCi5mre0VS19KLHnX0vS/gAcO0pFheo388ldPBJiXX5Qdm0FwC821F8wqilNK/P+Wt L1o4IKKmdkeexEfogdz8Qy+Z/2GIY1cqCgJPLs166r2euO/cQfWD0PkPT2wnP2Msz8 bqjKt2zNCbgipaV3uBkCaAymj9DzCA9LK/MMhpAYeW3tBX+bOb6fAZ2rWnKBot5gh1 VSnlOBPmkC5h8Y5qE3waSP4bZofdcbKT+iQmmAkkGN6B+6W8J5847jG22qGS5RwtzN byNW8IwCG4mkA== Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 11:33:58 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Hangbin Liu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] selftests: net: use slowwait to stabilize vrf_route_leaking test Message-ID: <20250618103358.GB1699@horms.kernel.org> References: <20250617105101.433718-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <20250617105101.433718-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250617105101.433718-2-liuhangbin@gmail.com> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:50:59AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote: > The vrf_route_leaking test occasionally fails due to connectivity issues > in our testing environment. A sample failure message shows that the ping > check fails intermittently > > PING 2001:db8:16:2::2 (2001:db8:16:2::2) 56 data bytes > > --- 2001:db8:16:2::2 ping statistics --- > 1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms > > TEST: Basic IPv6 connectivity [FAIL] > > This is likely due to insufficient wait time on slower machines. To address > this, switch to using slowwait, which provides a longer and more reliable > wait for setup completion. > > Before this change, the test failed 3 out of 10 times. After applying this > fix, the test was run 30 times without any failure. > > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu Reviewed-by: Simon Horman