From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jacek Kowalski <jacek@jacekk.info>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] e1000: drop checksum constant cast to u16 in comparisons
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:19:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625121932.GC1562@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625121828.GB1562@horms.kernel.org>
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 01:18:28PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:29:43PM +0200, Jacek Kowalski wrote:
>
> Hi Jacek,
>
> Thanks for the patchset.
>
> Some feedback at a high level:
>
> 1. It's normal for patch-sets, to have a cover letter.
> That provides a handy place for high level comments,
> perhaps ironically, such as this one.
>
> 2. Please provide some text in the patch description.
> I know these changes are trivial. But we'd like to have something there.
> E.g.
>
> Remove unnecessary cast of constants to u16,
> allowing the C type system to do it's thing.
>
> No behavioural change intended.
> Compile tested only.
>
> 3. This patchset should probably be targeted at iwl-next, like this:
>
> Subject: [PATCH iwl-next] ...
>
> 4. Please make sure the patchset applies cleanly to it's target tree.
> It seems that in it's current form the patchset doesn't
> apply to iwl-next or net-next.
>
> 5. It's up to you. But in general there is no need
> to CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org on Networking patches
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacek Kowalski <Jacek@jacekk.info>
> > Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
>
> As for this patch itself, it looks good to me.
> But I think you missed two.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> index b5a31e8d84f4..0e5de52b1067 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> @@ -3997,7 +3997,7 @@ s32 e1000_update_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> }
> checksum += eeprom_data;
> }
> - checksum = (u16)EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> + checksum = EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> if (e1000_write_eeprom(hw, EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG, 1, &checksum) < 0) {
> e_dbg("EEPROM Write Error\n");
> return -E1000_ERR_EEPROM;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/nvm.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/nvm.c
> index 1c9071396b3c..556dbefdcef9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/nvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/nvm.c
> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ s32 e1000e_update_nvm_checksum_generic(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> }
> checksum += nvm_data;
> }
> - checksum = (u16)NVM_SUM - checksum;
> + checksum = NVM_SUM - checksum;
> ret_val = e1000_write_nvm(hw, NVM_CHECKSUM_REG, 1, &checksum);
> if (ret_val)
> e_dbg("NVM Write Error while updating checksum.\n");
Sorry, I now see that the 2nd of the two hunks above is for patch 2/4.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 19:29 [PATCH 1/4] e1000: drop checksum constant cast to u16 in comparisons Jacek Kowalski
2025-06-24 19:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] e1000e: " Jacek Kowalski
2025-06-24 19:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] igb: " Jacek Kowalski
2025-06-25 12:21 ` Simon Horman
2025-06-24 19:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] igc: " Jacek Kowalski
2025-06-25 12:22 ` Simon Horman
2025-06-25 16:12 ` David Laight
2025-06-25 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] e1000: " Simon Horman
2025-06-25 12:19 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-06-25 13:03 ` Jacek Kowalski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250625121932.GC1562@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacek@jacekk.info \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox