netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration
@ 2025-06-30 17:16 Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: tcp: Make mem flags configurable through bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch Jordan Rife
                   ` (11 more replies)
  0 siblings, 12 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

TCP socket iterators use iter->offset to track progress through a
bucket, which is a measure of the number of matching sockets from the
current bucket that have been seen or processed by the iterator. On
subsequent iterations, if the current bucket has unprocessed items, we
skip at least iter->offset matching items in the bucket before adding
any remaining items to the next batch. However, iter->offset isn't
always an accurate measure of "things already seen" when the underlying
bucket changes between reads which can lead to repeated or skipped
sockets. Instead, this series remembers the cookies of the sockets we
haven't seen yet in the current bucket and resumes from the first cookie
in that list that we can find on the next iteration.

This is a continuation of the work started in [1]. This series largely
replicates the patterns applied to UDP socket iterators, applying them
instead to TCP socket iterators.

CHANGES
=======
v2 -> v3:
* Unroll the loop inside bpf_iter_tcp_batch to make the logic easier to
  follow in patch two ("bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains
  a full bucket snapshot"). This gets rid of the `resizes` variable from
  v2 and eliminates the extra conditional that checks how many batch
  resize attempts have occurred so far (Stanislav).
    Note: This changes the behavior slightly. Before, in the case that
    the second call to tcp_seek_last_pos (and later bpf_iter_tcp_resume)
    advances to a new bucket, which may happen if the current bucket is
    emptied after releasing its lock, the `resizes` "budget" would be
    reset, the net effect being that we would try a batch resize with
    GFP_USER at most once per bucket. Now, we try to resize the batch
    with GFP_USER at most once per call, so it makes it slightly more
    likely that we hit the GFP_NOWAIT scenario. However, this edge case
    should be rare in practice anyway, and the new behavior is more or
    less consistent with the original retry logic, so avoid the loop and
    prefer code clarity.
* Move the call to bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch out of
  bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch and call it directly before invoking
  bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch with GFP_USER inside bpf_iter_tcp_batch.
  /Don't/ call it before invoking bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch the second
  time while we hold the lock with GFP_NOWAIT. This avoids a conditional
  inside bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch from v2 that only calls
  bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch if flags != GFP_NOWAIT and is a bit more
  explicit (Stanislav).
* Adjust patch five ("bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during
  iteration") to fit with the new logic in patch two.

v1 -> v2:
* In patch five ("bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during
  iteration"), remove unnecessary bucket bounds checks in
  bpf_iter_tcp_resume. In either case, if st->bucket is outside the
  current table's range then bpf_iter_tcp_resume_* calls *_get_first
  which immediately returns NULL anyway and the logic will fall through.
  (Martin)
* Add a check at the top of bpf_iter_tcp_resume_listening and
  bpf_iter_tcp_resume_established to see if we're done with the current
  bucket and advance it immediately instead of wasting time finding the
  first matching socket in that bucket with
  (listening|established)_get_first. In v1, we originally discussed
  adding logic to advance the bucket in bpf_iter_tcp_seq_next and
  bpf_iter_tcp_seq_stop, but after trying this the logic seemed harder
  to track. Overall, keeping everything inside bpf_iter_tcp_resume_*
  seemed a bit clearer. (Martin)
* Instead of using a timeout in the last patch ("selftests/bpf: Add
  tests for bucket resume logic in established sockets") to wait for
  sockets to leave the ehash table after calling close(), use
  bpf_sock_destroy to deterministically destroy and remove them. This
  introduces one more patch ("selftests/bpf: Create iter_tcp_destroy
  test program") to create the iterator program that destroys a selected
  socket. Drive this through a destroy() function in the last patch
  which, just like close(), accepts a socket file descriptor. (Martin)
* Introduce one more patch ("selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over
  multiple states") to fix a latent bug in iter_tcp_soreuse where the
  sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN check was ignored. Add the "ss" variable to
  allow test code to configure which socket states to allow.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250502161528.264630-1-jordan@jrife.io/

Jordan Rife (12):
  bpf: tcp: Make mem flags configurable through
    bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch
  bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot
  bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done
  bpf: tcp: Use bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item for bpf_tcp_iter_state batch
    items
  bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration
  selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in listening sockets
  selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple ports
  selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple states
  selftests/bpf: Make ehash buckets configurable in socket iterator
    tests
  selftests/bpf: Create established sockets in socket iterator tests
  selftests/bpf: Create iter_tcp_destroy test program
  selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in established
    sockets

 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c                           | 269 ++++++++---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c          | 450 +++++++++++++++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c     |  37 +-
 3 files changed, 672 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: tcp: Make mem flags configurable through bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:16 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot Jordan Rife
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Prepare for the next patch which needs to be able to choose either
GFP_USER or GFP_NOWAIT for calls to bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 6a14f9e6fef6..2e40af6aff37 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -3048,12 +3048,12 @@ static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter)
 }
 
 static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
-				      unsigned int new_batch_sz)
+				      unsigned int new_batch_sz, gfp_t flags)
 {
 	struct sock **new_batch;
 
 	new_batch = kvmalloc(sizeof(*new_batch) * new_batch_sz,
-			     GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+			     flags | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (!new_batch)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -3165,7 +3165,8 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 		return sk;
 	}
 
-	if (!resized && !bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(iter, expected * 3 / 2)) {
+	if (!resized && !bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(iter, expected * 3 / 2,
+						    GFP_USER)) {
 		resized = true;
 		goto again;
 	}
@@ -3596,7 +3597,7 @@ static int bpf_iter_init_tcp(void *priv_data, struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(iter, INIT_BATCH_SZ);
+	err = bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(iter, INIT_BATCH_SZ, GFP_USER);
 	if (err) {
 		bpf_iter_fini_seq_net(priv_data);
 		return err;
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: tcp: Make mem flags configurable through bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:16 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 18:31   ` Stanislav Fomichev
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done Jordan Rife
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Require that iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot. This
invariant is important to avoid skipping or repeating sockets during
iteration when combined with the next few patches. Before, there were
two cases where a call to bpf_iter_tcp_batch may only capture part of a
bucket:

1. When bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() returns -ENOMEM.
2. When more sockets are added to the bucket while calling
   bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(), making the updated batch size
   insufficient.

In cases where the batch size only covers part of a bucket, it is
possible to forget which sockets were already visited, especially if we
have to process a bucket in more than two batches. This forces us to
choose between repeating or skipping sockets, so don't allow this:

1. Stop iteration and propagate -ENOMEM up to userspace if reallocation
   fails instead of continuing with a partial batch.
2. Try bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() with GFP_USER just as before, but if
   we still aren't able to capture the full bucket, call
   bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() again while holding the bucket lock to
   guarantee the bucket does not change. On the second attempt use
   GFP_NOWAIT since we hold onto the spin lock.

I did some manual testing to exercise the code paths where GFP_NOWAIT is
used and where ERR_PTR(err) is returned. I used the realloc test cases
included later in this series to trigger a scenario where a realloc
happens inside bpf_iter_tcp_batch and made a small code tweak to force
the first realloc attempt to allocate a too-small batch, thus requiring
another attempt with GFP_NOWAIT. Some printks showed both reallocs with
the tests passing:

Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_USER
Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_NOWAIT
Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_USER
Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_NOWAIT

With this setup, I also forced each of the bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch
calls to return -ENOMEM to ensure that iteration ends and that the
read() in userspace fails.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 2e40af6aff37..565afaa1ea2f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -3057,7 +3057,7 @@ static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
 	if (!new_batch)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(iter);
+	memcpy(new_batch, iter->batch, sizeof(*iter->batch) * iter->end_sk);
 	kvfree(iter->batch);
 	iter->batch = new_batch;
 	iter->max_sk = new_batch_sz;
@@ -3066,69 +3066,95 @@ static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
 }
 
 static unsigned int bpf_iter_tcp_listening_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
-						 struct sock *start_sk)
+						 struct sock **start_sk)
 {
-	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
 	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
-	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
 	struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
 	unsigned int expected = 1;
 	struct sock *sk;
 
-	sock_hold(start_sk);
-	iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = start_sk;
+	sock_hold(*start_sk);
+	iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = *start_sk;
 
-	sk = sk_nulls_next(start_sk);
+	sk = sk_nulls_next(*start_sk);
+	*start_sk = NULL;
 	sk_nulls_for_each_from(sk, node) {
 		if (seq_sk_match(seq, sk)) {
 			if (iter->end_sk < iter->max_sk) {
 				sock_hold(sk);
 				iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = sk;
+			} else if (!*start_sk) {
+				/* Remember where we left off. */
+				*start_sk = sk;
 			}
 			expected++;
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&hinfo->lhash2[st->bucket].lock);
 
 	return expected;
 }
 
 static unsigned int bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
-						   struct sock *start_sk)
+						   struct sock **start_sk)
 {
-	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
 	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
-	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
 	struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
 	unsigned int expected = 1;
 	struct sock *sk;
 
-	sock_hold(start_sk);
-	iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = start_sk;
+	sock_hold(*start_sk);
+	iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = *start_sk;
 
-	sk = sk_nulls_next(start_sk);
+	sk = sk_nulls_next(*start_sk);
+	*start_sk = NULL;
 	sk_nulls_for_each_from(sk, node) {
 		if (seq_sk_match(seq, sk)) {
 			if (iter->end_sk < iter->max_sk) {
 				sock_hold(sk);
 				iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = sk;
+			} else if (!*start_sk) {
+				/* Remember where we left off. */
+				*start_sk = sk;
 			}
 			expected++;
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock_bh(inet_ehash_lockp(hinfo, st->bucket));
 
 	return expected;
 }
 
+static unsigned int bpf_iter_fill_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
+					struct sock **start_sk)
+{
+	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
+	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
+
+	if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING)
+		return bpf_iter_tcp_listening_batch(seq, start_sk);
+	else
+		return bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch(seq, start_sk);
+}
+
+static void bpf_iter_tcp_unlock_bucket(struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
+	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
+	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
+
+	if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING)
+		spin_unlock(&hinfo->lhash2[st->bucket].lock);
+	else
+		spin_unlock_bh(inet_ehash_lockp(hinfo, st->bucket));
+}
+
 static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 {
 	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
 	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
 	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
 	unsigned int expected;
-	bool resized = false;
 	struct sock *sk;
+	int err;
 
 	/* The st->bucket is done.  Directly advance to the next
 	 * bucket instead of having the tcp_seek_last_pos() to skip
@@ -3145,33 +3171,52 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 		}
 	}
 
-again:
-	/* Get a new batch */
 	iter->cur_sk = 0;
 	iter->end_sk = 0;
-	iter->st_bucket_done = false;
+	iter->st_bucket_done = true;
 
 	sk = tcp_seek_last_pos(seq);
 	if (!sk)
 		return NULL; /* Done */
 
-	if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING)
-		expected = bpf_iter_tcp_listening_batch(seq, sk);
-	else
-		expected = bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch(seq, sk);
+	expected = bpf_iter_fill_batch(seq, &sk);
+	if (likely(iter->end_sk == expected))
+		goto done;
 
-	if (iter->end_sk == expected) {
-		iter->st_bucket_done = true;
-		return sk;
-	}
+	/* Batch size was too small. */
+	bpf_iter_tcp_unlock_bucket(seq);
+	bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(iter);
+	err = bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(iter, expected * 3 / 2,
+					 GFP_USER);
+	if (err)
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+
+	iter->cur_sk = 0;
+	iter->end_sk = 0;
+
+	sk = tcp_seek_last_pos(seq);
+	if (!sk)
+		return NULL; /* Done */
+
+	expected = bpf_iter_fill_batch(seq, &sk);
+	if (likely(iter->end_sk == expected))
+		goto done;
 
-	if (!resized && !bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(iter, expected * 3 / 2,
-						    GFP_USER)) {
-		resized = true;
-		goto again;
+	/* Batch size was still too small. Hold onto the lock while we try
+	 * again with a larger batch to make sure the current bucket's size
+	 * does not change in the meantime.
+	 */
+	err = bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(iter, expected, GFP_NOWAIT);
+	if (err) {
+		bpf_iter_tcp_unlock_bucket(seq);
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
 	}
 
-	return sk;
+	expected = bpf_iter_fill_batch(seq, &sk);
+done:
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->end_sk != expected);
+	bpf_iter_tcp_unlock_bucket(seq);
+	return iter->batch[0];
 }
 
 static void *bpf_iter_tcp_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: tcp: Make mem flags configurable through bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:16 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/12] bpf: tcp: Use bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item for bpf_tcp_iter_state batch items Jordan Rife
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Get rid of the st_bucket_done field to simplify TCP iterator state and
logic. Before, st_bucket_done could be false if bpf_iter_tcp_batch
returned a partial batch; however, with the last patch ("bpf: tcp: Make
sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot"),
st_bucket_done == true is equivalent to iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 565afaa1ea2f..8a1fd64d8891 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -3020,7 +3020,6 @@ struct bpf_tcp_iter_state {
 	unsigned int end_sk;
 	unsigned int max_sk;
 	struct sock **batch;
-	bool st_bucket_done;
 };
 
 struct bpf_iter__tcp {
@@ -3043,8 +3042,10 @@ static int tcp_prog_seq_show(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta,
 
 static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter)
 {
-	while (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
-		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]);
+	unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
+
+	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
+		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++]);
 }
 
 static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
@@ -3161,7 +3162,7 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 	 * one by one in the current bucket and eventually find out
 	 * it has to advance to the next bucket.
 	 */
-	if (iter->st_bucket_done) {
+	if (iter->end_sk && iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk) {
 		st->offset = 0;
 		st->bucket++;
 		if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING &&
@@ -3173,7 +3174,6 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 
 	iter->cur_sk = 0;
 	iter->end_sk = 0;
-	iter->st_bucket_done = true;
 
 	sk = tcp_seek_last_pos(seq);
 	if (!sk)
@@ -3321,10 +3321,8 @@ static void bpf_iter_tcp_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 			(void)tcp_prog_seq_show(prog, &meta, v, 0);
 	}
 
-	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) {
+	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
 		bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(iter);
-		iter->st_bucket_done = false;
-	}
 }
 
 static const struct seq_operations bpf_iter_tcp_seq_ops = {
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/12] bpf: tcp: Use bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item for bpf_tcp_iter_state batch items
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:16 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Prepare for the next patch that tracks cookies between iterations by
converting struct sock **batch to union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item *batch
inside struct bpf_tcp_iter_state.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 8a1fd64d8891..bb51d62066a4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -3014,12 +3014,16 @@ static int tcp4_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
+union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item {
+	struct sock *sk;
+};
+
 struct bpf_tcp_iter_state {
 	struct tcp_iter_state state;
 	unsigned int cur_sk;
 	unsigned int end_sk;
 	unsigned int max_sk;
-	struct sock **batch;
+	union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item *batch;
 };
 
 struct bpf_iter__tcp {
@@ -3045,13 +3049,13 @@ static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter)
 	unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
 
 	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
-		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++]);
+		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++].sk);
 }
 
 static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
 				      unsigned int new_batch_sz, gfp_t flags)
 {
-	struct sock **new_batch;
+	union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item *new_batch;
 
 	new_batch = kvmalloc(sizeof(*new_batch) * new_batch_sz,
 			     flags | __GFP_NOWARN);
@@ -3075,7 +3079,7 @@ static unsigned int bpf_iter_tcp_listening_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
 	struct sock *sk;
 
 	sock_hold(*start_sk);
-	iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = *start_sk;
+	iter->batch[iter->end_sk++].sk = *start_sk;
 
 	sk = sk_nulls_next(*start_sk);
 	*start_sk = NULL;
@@ -3083,7 +3087,7 @@ static unsigned int bpf_iter_tcp_listening_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
 		if (seq_sk_match(seq, sk)) {
 			if (iter->end_sk < iter->max_sk) {
 				sock_hold(sk);
-				iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = sk;
+				iter->batch[iter->end_sk++].sk = sk;
 			} else if (!*start_sk) {
 				/* Remember where we left off. */
 				*start_sk = sk;
@@ -3104,7 +3108,7 @@ static unsigned int bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
 	struct sock *sk;
 
 	sock_hold(*start_sk);
-	iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = *start_sk;
+	iter->batch[iter->end_sk++].sk = *start_sk;
 
 	sk = sk_nulls_next(*start_sk);
 	*start_sk = NULL;
@@ -3112,7 +3116,7 @@ static unsigned int bpf_iter_tcp_established_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
 		if (seq_sk_match(seq, sk)) {
 			if (iter->end_sk < iter->max_sk) {
 				sock_hold(sk);
-				iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = sk;
+				iter->batch[iter->end_sk++].sk = sk;
 			} else if (!*start_sk) {
 				/* Remember where we left off. */
 				*start_sk = sk;
@@ -3216,7 +3220,7 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 done:
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->end_sk != expected);
 	bpf_iter_tcp_unlock_bucket(seq);
-	return iter->batch[0];
+	return iter->batch[0].sk;
 }
 
 static void *bpf_iter_tcp_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
@@ -3251,11 +3255,11 @@ static void *bpf_iter_tcp_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 		 * st->bucket.  See tcp_seek_last_pos().
 		 */
 		st->offset++;
-		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]);
+		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++].sk);
 	}
 
 	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
-		sk = iter->batch[iter->cur_sk];
+		sk = iter->batch[iter->cur_sk].sk;
 	else
 		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_batch(seq);
 
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/12] bpf: tcp: Use bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item for bpf_tcp_iter_state batch items Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:16 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 18:32   ` Stanislav Fomichev
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in listening sockets Jordan Rife
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Replace the offset-based approach for tracking progress through a bucket
in the TCP table with one based on socket cookies. Remember the cookies
of unprocessed sockets from the last batch and use this list to
pick up where we left off or, in the case that the next socket
disappears between reads, find the first socket after that point that
still exists in the bucket and resume from there.

This approach guarantees that all sockets that existed when iteration
began and continue to exist throughout will be visited exactly once.
Sockets that are added to the table during iteration may or may not be
seen, but if they are they will be seen exactly once.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index bb51d62066a4..510053836a3c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
 #include <linux/times.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/sock_diag.h>
 
 #include <net/net_namespace.h>
 #include <net/icmp.h>
@@ -3016,6 +3017,7 @@ static int tcp4_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
 union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item {
 	struct sock *sk;
+	__u64 cookie;
 };
 
 struct bpf_tcp_iter_state {
@@ -3046,10 +3048,19 @@ static int tcp_prog_seq_show(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta,
 
 static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter)
 {
+	union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item *item;
 	unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
+	__u64 cookie;
 
-	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
-		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++].sk);
+	/* Remember the cookies of the sockets we haven't seen yet, so we can
+	 * pick up where we left off next time around.
+	 */
+	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk) {
+		item = &iter->batch[cur_sk++];
+		cookie = sock_gen_cookie(item->sk);
+		sock_gen_put(item->sk);
+		item->cookie = cookie;
+	}
 }
 
 static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
@@ -3070,6 +3081,106 @@ static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_resume_bucket(struct sock *first_sk,
+					       union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item *cookies,
+					       int n_cookies)
+{
+	struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
+	struct sock *sk;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < n_cookies; i++) {
+		sk = first_sk;
+		sk_nulls_for_each_from(sk, node) {
+			if (cookies[i].cookie == atomic64_read(&sk->sk_cookie))
+				return sk;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_resume_listening(struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
+	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
+	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
+	unsigned int find_cookie = iter->cur_sk;
+	unsigned int end_cookie = iter->end_sk;
+	int resume_bucket = st->bucket;
+	struct sock *sk;
+
+	if (end_cookie && find_cookie == end_cookie)
+		++st->bucket;
+
+	sk = listening_get_first(seq);
+	iter->cur_sk = 0;
+	iter->end_sk = 0;
+
+	if (sk && st->bucket == resume_bucket && end_cookie) {
+		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume_bucket(sk, &iter->batch[find_cookie],
+						end_cookie - find_cookie);
+		if (!sk) {
+			spin_unlock(&hinfo->lhash2[st->bucket].lock);
+			++st->bucket;
+			sk = listening_get_first(seq);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return sk;
+}
+
+static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_resume_established(struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
+	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
+	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
+	unsigned int find_cookie = iter->cur_sk;
+	unsigned int end_cookie = iter->end_sk;
+	int resume_bucket = st->bucket;
+	struct sock *sk;
+
+	if (end_cookie && find_cookie == end_cookie)
+		++st->bucket;
+
+	sk = established_get_first(seq);
+	iter->cur_sk = 0;
+	iter->end_sk = 0;
+
+	if (sk && st->bucket == resume_bucket && end_cookie) {
+		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume_bucket(sk, &iter->batch[find_cookie],
+						end_cookie - find_cookie);
+		if (!sk) {
+			spin_unlock_bh(inet_ehash_lockp(hinfo, st->bucket));
+			++st->bucket;
+			sk = established_get_first(seq);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return sk;
+}
+
+static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_resume(struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
+	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
+	struct sock *sk = NULL;
+
+	switch (st->state) {
+	case TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING:
+		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume_listening(seq);
+		if (sk)
+			break;
+		st->bucket = 0;
+		st->state = TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED;
+		fallthrough;
+	case TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED:
+		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume_established(seq);
+	}
+
+	return sk;
+}
+
 static unsigned int bpf_iter_tcp_listening_batch(struct seq_file *seq,
 						 struct sock **start_sk)
 {
@@ -3154,32 +3265,12 @@ static void bpf_iter_tcp_unlock_bucket(struct seq_file *seq)
 
 static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 {
-	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
 	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
-	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
 	unsigned int expected;
 	struct sock *sk;
 	int err;
 
-	/* The st->bucket is done.  Directly advance to the next
-	 * bucket instead of having the tcp_seek_last_pos() to skip
-	 * one by one in the current bucket and eventually find out
-	 * it has to advance to the next bucket.
-	 */
-	if (iter->end_sk && iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk) {
-		st->offset = 0;
-		st->bucket++;
-		if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING &&
-		    st->bucket > hinfo->lhash2_mask) {
-			st->state = TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED;
-			st->bucket = 0;
-		}
-	}
-
-	iter->cur_sk = 0;
-	iter->end_sk = 0;
-
-	sk = tcp_seek_last_pos(seq);
+	sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume(seq);
 	if (!sk)
 		return NULL; /* Done */
 
@@ -3195,10 +3286,7 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 	if (err)
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
 
-	iter->cur_sk = 0;
-	iter->end_sk = 0;
-
-	sk = tcp_seek_last_pos(seq);
+	sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume(seq);
 	if (!sk)
 		return NULL; /* Done */
 
@@ -3250,11 +3338,6 @@ static void *bpf_iter_tcp_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 		 * meta.seq_num is used instead.
 		 */
 		st->num++;
-		/* Move st->offset to the next sk in the bucket such that
-		 * the future start() will resume at st->offset in
-		 * st->bucket.  See tcp_seek_last_pos().
-		 */
-		st->offset++;
 		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++].sk);
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in listening sockets
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:16 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple ports Jordan Rife
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Replicate the set of test cases used for UDP socket iterators to test
similar scenarios for TCP listening sockets.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c          | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
index a4517bee34d5..2adacd91fdf8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -358,6 +358,53 @@ static struct test_case resume_tests[] = {
 		.family = AF_INET6,
 		.test = force_realloc,
 	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: resume after removing a seen socket (listening)",
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = remove_seen,
+	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: resume after removing one unseen socket (listening)",
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = remove_unseen,
+	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: resume after removing all unseen sockets (listening)",
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = remove_all,
+	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: resume after adding a few sockets (listening)",
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		/* Use AF_INET so that new sockets are added to the head of the
+		 * bucket's list.
+		 */
+		.family = AF_INET,
+		.test = add_some,
+	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: force a realloc to occur (listening)",
+		.init_socks = init_batch_size,
+		.max_socks = init_batch_size * 2,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		/* Use AF_INET6 so that new sockets are added to the tail of the
+		 * bucket's list, needing to be added to the next batch to force
+		 * a realloc.
+		 */
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = force_realloc,
+	},
 };
 
 static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple ports
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in listening sockets Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:17 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple states Jordan Rife
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Prepare to test TCP socket iteration over both listening and established
sockets by allowing the BPF iterator programs to skip the port check.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c | 7 ++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c      | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
index 2adacd91fdf8..0d0f1b4debff 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -416,7 +416,6 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
 	int err, iter_fd = -1;
 	const char *addr;
 	int *fds = NULL;
-	int local_port;
 
 	counts = calloc(tc->max_socks, sizeof(*counts));
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(counts, "counts"))
@@ -431,10 +430,8 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
 				     tc->init_socks);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(fds, "start_reuseport_server"))
 		goto done;
-	local_port = get_socket_local_port(*fds);
-	if (!ASSERT_GE(local_port, 0, "get_socket_local_port"))
-		goto done;
-	skel->rodata->ports[0] = ntohs(local_port);
+	skel->rodata->ports[0] = 0;
+	skel->rodata->ports[1] = 0;
 	skel->rodata->sf = tc->family;
 
 	err = sock_iter_batch__load(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
index 8f483337e103..40dce6a38c30 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ int iter_tcp_soreuse(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
 		idx = 0;
 	else if (sk->sk_num == ports[1])
 		idx = 1;
+	else if (!ports[0] && !ports[1])
+		idx = 0;
 	else
 		return 0;
 
@@ -92,6 +94,8 @@ int iter_udp_soreuse(struct bpf_iter__udp *ctx)
 		idx = 0;
 	else if (sk->sk_num == ports[1])
 		idx = 1;
+	else if (!ports[0] && !ports[1])
+		idx = 0;
 	else
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple states
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple ports Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:17 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 18:34   ` Stanislav Fomichev
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Make ehash buckets configurable in socket iterator tests Jordan Rife
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Add parentheses around loopback address check to fix up logic and make
the socket state filter configurable for the TCP socket iterators.
Iterators can skip the socket state check by setting ss to 0.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c        |  2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c   | 11 ++++++-----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
index 0d0f1b4debff..afe0f55ead75 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
 	skel->rodata->ports[0] = 0;
 	skel->rodata->ports[1] = 0;
 	skel->rodata->sf = tc->family;
+	skel->rodata->ss = 0;
 
 	err = sock_iter_batch__load(skel);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "sock_iter_batch__load"))
@@ -498,6 +499,7 @@ static void do_test(int sock_type, bool onebyone)
 		skel->rodata->ports[i] = ntohs(local_port);
 	}
 	skel->rodata->sf = AF_INET6;
+	skel->rodata->ss = TCP_LISTEN;
 
 	err = sock_iter_batch__load(skel);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "sock_iter_batch__load"))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
index 40dce6a38c30..a36361e4a5de 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static bool ipv4_addr_loopback(__be32 a)
 }
 
 volatile const unsigned int sf;
+volatile const unsigned int ss;
 volatile const __u16 ports[2];
 unsigned int bucket[2];
 
@@ -42,10 +43,10 @@ int iter_tcp_soreuse(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
 	sock_cookie = bpf_get_socket_cookie(sk);
 	sk = bpf_core_cast(sk, struct sock);
 	if (sk->sk_family != sf ||
-	    sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN ||
-	    sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ?
+	    (ss && sk->sk_state != ss) ||
+	    (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ?
 	    !ipv6_addr_loopback(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr) :
-	    !ipv4_addr_loopback(sk->sk_rcv_saddr))
+	    !ipv4_addr_loopback(sk->sk_rcv_saddr)))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (sk->sk_num == ports[0])
@@ -85,9 +86,9 @@ int iter_udp_soreuse(struct bpf_iter__udp *ctx)
 	sock_cookie = bpf_get_socket_cookie(sk);
 	sk = bpf_core_cast(sk, struct sock);
 	if (sk->sk_family != sf ||
-	    sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ?
+	    (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ?
 	    !ipv6_addr_loopback(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr) :
-	    !ipv4_addr_loopback(sk->sk_rcv_saddr))
+	    !ipv4_addr_loopback(sk->sk_rcv_saddr)))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (sk->sk_num == ports[0])
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Make ehash buckets configurable in socket iterator tests
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple states Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:17 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Create established sockets " Jordan Rife
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Prepare for bucket resume tests for established TCP sockets by making
the number of ehash buckets configurable. Subsequent patches force all
established sockets into the same bucket by setting ehash_buckets to
one.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c          | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
index afe0f55ead75..4c145c5415f1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include "sock_iter_batch.skel.h"
 
 #define TEST_NS "sock_iter_batch_netns"
+#define TEST_CHILD_NS "sock_iter_batch_child_netns"
 
 static const int init_batch_size = 16;
 static const int nr_soreuse = 4;
@@ -304,6 +305,7 @@ struct test_case {
 		     int *socks, int socks_len, struct sock_count *counts,
 		     int counts_len, struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd);
 	const char *description;
+	int ehash_buckets;
 	int init_socks;
 	int max_socks;
 	int sock_type;
@@ -410,13 +412,25 @@ static struct test_case resume_tests[] = {
 static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
 {
 	struct sock_iter_batch *skel = NULL;
+	struct sock_count *counts = NULL;
 	static const __u16 port = 10001;
+	struct nstoken *nstoken = NULL;
 	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
-	struct sock_count *counts;
 	int err, iter_fd = -1;
 	const char *addr;
 	int *fds = NULL;
 
+	if (tc->ehash_buckets) {
+		SYS_NOFAIL("ip netns del " TEST_CHILD_NS);
+		SYS(done, "sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_child_ehash_entries=%d",
+		    tc->ehash_buckets);
+		SYS(done, "ip netns add %s", TEST_CHILD_NS);
+		SYS(done, "ip -net %s link set dev lo up", TEST_CHILD_NS);
+		nstoken = open_netns(TEST_CHILD_NS);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "open_child_netns"))
+			goto done;
+	}
+
 	counts = calloc(tc->max_socks, sizeof(*counts));
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(counts, "counts"))
 		goto done;
@@ -453,6 +467,9 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
 	tc->test(tc->family, tc->sock_type, addr, port, fds, tc->init_socks,
 		 counts, tc->max_socks, link, iter_fd);
 done:
+	close_netns(nstoken);
+	SYS_NOFAIL("ip netns del " TEST_CHILD_NS);
+	SYS_NOFAIL("sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_child_ehash_entries=0");
 	free(counts);
 	free_fds(fds, tc->init_socks);
 	if (iter_fd >= 0)
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Create established sockets in socket iterator tests
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Make ehash buckets configurable in socket iterator tests Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:17 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 18:47   ` Stanislav Fomichev
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Create iter_tcp_destroy test program Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in established sockets Jordan Rife
  11 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Prepare for bucket resume tests for established TCP sockets by creating
established sockets. Collect socket fds from connect() and accept()
sides and pass them to test cases.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c          | 83 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
index 4c145c5415f1..2b0504cb127b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -153,8 +153,66 @@ static void check_n_were_seen_once(int *fds, int fds_len, int n,
 	ASSERT_EQ(seen_once, n, "seen_once");
 }
 
+static int accept_from_one(int *server_fds, int server_fds_len)
+{
+	int i = 0;
+	int fd;
+
+	for (; i < server_fds_len; i++) {
+		fd = accept(server_fds[i], NULL, NULL);
+		if (fd >= 0)
+			return fd;
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(errno, EWOULDBLOCK, "EWOULDBLOCK"))
+			return -1;
+	}
+
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static int *connect_to_server(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
+			      __u16 port, int nr_connects, int *server_fds,
+			      int server_fds_len)
+{
+	struct network_helper_opts opts = {
+		.timeout_ms = 0,
+	};
+	int *established_socks;
+	int i;
+
+	/* Make sure accept() doesn't block. */
+	for (i = 0; i < server_fds_len; i++)
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(fcntl(server_fds[i], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK),
+			       "fcntl(O_NONBLOCK)"))
+			return NULL;
+
+	established_socks = malloc(sizeof(int) * nr_connects*2);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(established_socks, "established_socks"))
+		return NULL;
+
+	i = 0;
+
+	while (nr_connects--) {
+		established_socks[i] = connect_to_addr_str(family, sock_type,
+							   addr, port, &opts);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(established_socks[i], "connect_to_addr_str"))
+			goto error;
+		i++;
+		established_socks[i] = accept_from_one(server_fds,
+						       server_fds_len);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(established_socks[i], "accept_from_one"))
+			goto error;
+		i++;
+	}
+
+	return established_socks;
+error:
+	free_fds(established_socks, i);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static void remove_seen(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
-			int *socks, int socks_len, struct sock_count *counts,
+			int *socks, int socks_len, int *established_socks,
+			int established_socks_len, struct sock_count *counts,
 			int counts_len, struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
 {
 	int close_idx;
@@ -185,6 +243,7 @@ static void remove_seen(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
 
 static void remove_unseen(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 			  __u16 port, int *socks, int socks_len,
+			  int *established_socks, int established_socks_len,
 			  struct sock_count *counts, int counts_len,
 			  struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
 {
@@ -217,6 +276,7 @@ static void remove_unseen(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 
 static void remove_all(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 		       __u16 port, int *socks, int socks_len,
+		       int *established_socks, int established_socks_len,
 		       struct sock_count *counts, int counts_len,
 		       struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
 {
@@ -244,7 +304,8 @@ static void remove_all(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 }
 
 static void add_some(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
-		     int *socks, int socks_len, struct sock_count *counts,
+		     int *socks, int socks_len, int *established_socks,
+		     int established_socks_len, struct sock_count *counts,
 		     int counts_len, struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
 {
 	int *new_socks = NULL;
@@ -274,6 +335,7 @@ static void add_some(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
 
 static void force_realloc(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 			  __u16 port, int *socks, int socks_len,
+			  int *established_socks, int established_socks_len,
 			  struct sock_count *counts, int counts_len,
 			  struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
 {
@@ -302,10 +364,12 @@ static void force_realloc(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 
 struct test_case {
 	void (*test)(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
-		     int *socks, int socks_len, struct sock_count *counts,
+		     int *socks, int socks_len, int *established_socks,
+		     int established_socks_len, struct sock_count *counts,
 		     int counts_len, struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd);
 	const char *description;
 	int ehash_buckets;
+	int connections;
 	int init_socks;
 	int max_socks;
 	int sock_type;
@@ -416,6 +480,7 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
 	static const __u16 port = 10001;
 	struct nstoken *nstoken = NULL;
 	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+	int *established_fds = NULL;
 	int err, iter_fd = -1;
 	const char *addr;
 	int *fds = NULL;
@@ -444,6 +509,14 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
 				     tc->init_socks);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(fds, "start_reuseport_server"))
 		goto done;
+	if (tc->connections) {
+		established_fds = connect_to_server(tc->family, tc->sock_type,
+						    addr, port,
+						    tc->connections, fds,
+						    tc->init_socks);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(established_fds, "connect_to_server"))
+			goto done;
+	}
 	skel->rodata->ports[0] = 0;
 	skel->rodata->ports[1] = 0;
 	skel->rodata->sf = tc->family;
@@ -465,13 +538,15 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
 		goto done;
 
 	tc->test(tc->family, tc->sock_type, addr, port, fds, tc->init_socks,
-		 counts, tc->max_socks, link, iter_fd);
+		 established_fds, tc->connections*2, counts, tc->max_socks,
+		 link, iter_fd);
 done:
 	close_netns(nstoken);
 	SYS_NOFAIL("ip netns del " TEST_CHILD_NS);
 	SYS_NOFAIL("sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_child_ehash_entries=0");
 	free(counts);
 	free_fds(fds, tc->init_socks);
+	free_fds(established_fds, tc->connections*2);
 	if (iter_fd >= 0)
 		close(iter_fd);
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Create iter_tcp_destroy test program
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Create established sockets " Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:17 ` Jordan Rife
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in established sockets Jordan Rife
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Prepare for bucket resume tests for established TCP sockets by creating
a program to immediately destroy and remove sockets from the TCP ehash
table, since close() is not deterministic.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c     | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
index a36361e4a5de..14513aa77800 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -70,6 +70,28 @@ int iter_tcp_soreuse(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sk) __ksym;
+volatile const __u64 destroy_cookie;
+
+SEC("iter/tcp")
+int iter_tcp_destroy(struct bpf_iter__tcp *ctx)
+{
+	struct sock_common *sk_common = (struct sock_common *)ctx->sk_common;
+	__u64 sock_cookie;
+
+	if (!sk_common)
+		return 0;
+
+	sock_cookie = bpf_get_socket_cookie(sk_common);
+	if (sock_cookie != destroy_cookie)
+		return 0;
+
+	bpf_sock_destroy(sk_common);
+	bpf_seq_write(ctx->meta->seq, &sock_cookie, sizeof(sock_cookie));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #define udp_sk(ptr) container_of(ptr, struct udp_sock, inet.sk)
 
 SEC("iter/udp")
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in established sockets
  2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Create iter_tcp_destroy test program Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 17:17 ` Jordan Rife
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-06-30 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, bpf
  Cc: Jordan Rife, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov, Stanislav Fomichev

Replicate the set of test cases used for UDP socket iterators to test
similar scenarios for TCP established sockets.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
---
 .../bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c          | 292 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 292 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
index 2b0504cb127b..2cb1b1896332 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
@@ -119,6 +119,44 @@ static int get_nth_socket(int *fds, int fds_len, struct bpf_link *link, int n)
 	return nth_sock_idx;
 }
 
+static void destroy(int fd)
+{
+	struct sock_iter_batch *skel = NULL;
+	__u64 cookie = socket_cookie(fd);
+	struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
+	int iter_fd = -1;
+	int nread;
+	__u64 out;
+
+	skel = sock_iter_batch__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "sock_iter_batch__open"))
+		goto done;
+
+	skel->rodata->destroy_cookie = cookie;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(sock_iter_batch__load(skel), "sock_iter_batch__load"))
+		goto done;
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_iter(skel->progs.iter_tcp_destroy, NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_iter"))
+		goto done;
+
+	iter_fd = bpf_iter_create(bpf_link__fd(link));
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(iter_fd, "bpf_iter_create"))
+		goto done;
+
+	/* Delete matching socket. */
+	nread = read(iter_fd, &out, sizeof(out));
+	ASSERT_GE(nread, 0, "nread");
+	if (nread)
+		ASSERT_EQ(out, cookie, "cookie matches");
+done:
+	if (iter_fd >= 0)
+		close(iter_fd);
+	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+	sock_iter_batch__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 static int get_seen_count(int fd, struct sock_count counts[], int n)
 {
 	__u64 cookie = socket_cookie(fd);
@@ -241,6 +279,43 @@ static void remove_seen(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
 			       counts_len);
 }
 
+static void remove_seen_established(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
+				    __u16 port, int *listen_socks,
+				    int listen_socks_len, int *established_socks,
+				    int established_socks_len,
+				    struct sock_count *counts, int counts_len,
+				    struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
+{
+	int close_idx;
+
+	/* Iterate through all listening sockets. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, listen_socks_len, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure we saw all listening sockets exactly once. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(listen_socks, listen_socks_len, listen_socks_len,
+			       counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Leave one established socket. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, established_socks_len - 1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Close a socket we've already seen to remove it from the bucket. */
+	close_idx = get_nth_socket(established_socks, established_socks_len,
+				   link, listen_socks_len + 1);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(close_idx, 0, "close_idx"))
+		return;
+	destroy(established_socks[close_idx]);
+	established_socks[close_idx] = -1;
+
+	/* Iterate through the rest of the sockets. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, -1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure the last socket wasn't skipped and that there were no
+	 * repeats.
+	 */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(established_socks, established_socks_len,
+			       established_socks_len - 1, counts, counts_len);
+}
+
 static void remove_unseen(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 			  __u16 port, int *socks, int socks_len,
 			  int *established_socks, int established_socks_len,
@@ -274,6 +349,51 @@ static void remove_unseen(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 			       counts_len);
 }
 
+static void remove_unseen_established(int family, int sock_type,
+				      const char *addr, __u16 port,
+				      int *listen_socks, int listen_socks_len,
+				      int *established_socks,
+				      int established_socks_len,
+				      struct sock_count *counts, int counts_len,
+				      struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
+{
+	int close_idx;
+
+	/* Iterate through all listening sockets. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, listen_socks_len, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure we saw all listening sockets exactly once. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(listen_socks, listen_socks_len, listen_socks_len,
+			       counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Iterate through the first established socket. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, 1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure we saw one established socks. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(established_socks, established_socks_len, 1,
+			       counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Close what would be the next socket in the bucket to exercise the
+	 * condition where we need to skip past the first cookie we remembered.
+	 */
+	close_idx = get_nth_socket(established_socks, established_socks_len,
+				   link, listen_socks_len + 1);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(close_idx, 0, "close_idx"))
+		return;
+
+	destroy(established_socks[close_idx]);
+	established_socks[close_idx] = -1;
+
+	/* Iterate through the rest of the sockets. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, -1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure the remaining sockets were seen exactly once and that we
+	 * didn't repeat the socket that was already seen.
+	 */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(established_socks, established_socks_len,
+			       established_socks_len - 1, counts, counts_len);
+}
+
 static void remove_all(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 		       __u16 port, int *socks, int socks_len,
 		       int *established_socks, int established_socks_len,
@@ -303,6 +423,54 @@ static void remove_all(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 	ASSERT_EQ(read_n(iter_fd, -1, counts, counts_len), 0, "read_n");
 }
 
+static void remove_all_established(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
+				   __u16 port, int *listen_socks,
+				   int listen_socks_len, int *established_socks,
+				   int established_socks_len,
+				   struct sock_count *counts, int counts_len,
+				   struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
+{
+	int *close_idx = NULL;
+	int i;
+
+	/* Iterate through all listening sockets. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, listen_socks_len, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure we saw all listening sockets exactly once. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(listen_socks, listen_socks_len, listen_socks_len,
+			       counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Iterate through the first established socket. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, 1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure we saw one established socks. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(established_socks, established_socks_len, 1,
+			       counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Close all remaining sockets to exhaust the list of saved cookies and
+	 * exit without putting any sockets into the batch on the next read.
+	 */
+	close_idx = malloc(sizeof(int) * (established_socks_len - 1));
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(close_idx, "close_idx malloc"))
+		return;
+	for (i = 0; i < established_socks_len - 1; i++) {
+		close_idx[i] = get_nth_socket(established_socks,
+					      established_socks_len, link,
+					      listen_socks_len + i);
+		if (!ASSERT_GE(close_idx[i], 0, "close_idx"))
+			return;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < established_socks_len - 1; i++) {
+		destroy(established_socks[close_idx[i]]);
+		established_socks[close_idx[i]] = -1;
+	}
+
+	/* Make sure there are no more sockets returned */
+	ASSERT_EQ(read_n(iter_fd, -1, counts, counts_len), 0, "read_n");
+	free(close_idx);
+}
+
 static void add_some(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
 		     int *socks, int socks_len, int *established_socks,
 		     int established_socks_len, struct sock_count *counts,
@@ -333,6 +501,49 @@ static void add_some(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
 	free_fds(new_socks, socks_len);
 }
 
+static void add_some_established(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
+				 __u16 port, int *listen_socks,
+				 int listen_socks_len, int *established_socks,
+				 int established_socks_len,
+				 struct sock_count *counts,
+				 int counts_len, struct bpf_link *link,
+				 int iter_fd)
+{
+	int *new_socks = NULL;
+
+	/* Iterate through all listening sockets. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, listen_socks_len, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure we saw all listening sockets exactly once. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(listen_socks, listen_socks_len, listen_socks_len,
+			       counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Iterate through the first established_socks_len - 1 sockets. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, established_socks_len - 1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure we saw established_socks_len - 1 sockets exactly once. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(established_socks, established_socks_len,
+			       established_socks_len - 1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Double the number of established sockets in the bucket. */
+	new_socks = connect_to_server(family, sock_type, addr, port,
+				      established_socks_len / 2, listen_socks,
+				      listen_socks_len);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(new_socks, "connect_to_server"))
+		goto done;
+
+	/* Iterate through the rest of the sockets. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, -1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure each of the original sockets was seen exactly once. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(listen_socks, listen_socks_len, listen_socks_len,
+			       counts, counts_len);
+	check_n_were_seen_once(established_socks, established_socks_len,
+			       established_socks_len, counts, counts_len);
+done:
+	free_fds(new_socks, established_socks_len);
+}
+
 static void force_realloc(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 			  __u16 port, int *socks, int socks_len,
 			  int *established_socks, int established_socks_len,
@@ -362,6 +573,24 @@ static void force_realloc(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr,
 	free_fds(new_socks, socks_len);
 }
 
+static void force_realloc_established(int family, int sock_type,
+				      const char *addr, __u16 port,
+				      int *listen_socks, int listen_socks_len,
+				      int *established_socks,
+				      int established_socks_len,
+				      struct sock_count *counts, int counts_len,
+				      struct bpf_link *link, int iter_fd)
+{
+	/* Iterate through all sockets to trigger a realloc. */
+	read_n(iter_fd, -1, counts, counts_len);
+
+	/* Make sure each socket was seen exactly once. */
+	check_n_were_seen_once(listen_socks, listen_socks_len, listen_socks_len,
+			       counts, counts_len);
+	check_n_were_seen_once(established_socks, established_socks_len,
+			       established_socks_len, counts, counts_len);
+}
+
 struct test_case {
 	void (*test)(int family, int sock_type, const char *addr, __u16 port,
 		     int *socks, int socks_len, int *established_socks,
@@ -471,6 +700,69 @@ static struct test_case resume_tests[] = {
 		.family = AF_INET6,
 		.test = force_realloc,
 	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: resume after removing a seen socket (established)",
+		/* Force all established sockets into one bucket */
+		.ehash_buckets = 1,
+		.connections = nr_soreuse,
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		/* Room for connect()ed and accept()ed sockets */
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse * 3,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = remove_seen_established,
+	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: resume after removing one unseen socket (established)",
+		/* Force all established sockets into one bucket */
+		.ehash_buckets = 1,
+		.connections = nr_soreuse,
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		/* Room for connect()ed and accept()ed sockets */
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse * 3,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = remove_unseen_established,
+	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: resume after removing all unseen sockets (established)",
+		/* Force all established sockets into one bucket */
+		.ehash_buckets = 1,
+		.connections = nr_soreuse,
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		/* Room for connect()ed and accept()ed sockets */
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse * 3,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = remove_all_established,
+	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: resume after adding a few sockets (established)",
+		/* Force all established sockets into one bucket */
+		.ehash_buckets = 1,
+		.connections = nr_soreuse,
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		/* Room for connect()ed and accept()ed sockets */
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse * 3,
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = add_some_established,
+	},
+	{
+		.description = "tcp: force a realloc to occur (established)",
+		/* Force all established sockets into one bucket */
+		.ehash_buckets = 1,
+		/* Bucket size will need to double when going from listening to
+		 * established sockets.
+		 */
+		.connections = init_batch_size,
+		.init_socks = nr_soreuse,
+		/* Room for connect()ed and accept()ed sockets */
+		.max_socks = nr_soreuse + (init_batch_size * 2),
+		.sock_type = SOCK_STREAM,
+		.family = AF_INET6,
+		.test = force_realloc_established,
+	},
 };
 
 static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 18:31   ` Stanislav Fomichev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2025-06-30 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jordan Rife
  Cc: netdev, bpf, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov

On 06/30, Jordan Rife wrote:
> Require that iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot. This
> invariant is important to avoid skipping or repeating sockets during
> iteration when combined with the next few patches. Before, there were
> two cases where a call to bpf_iter_tcp_batch may only capture part of a
> bucket:
> 
> 1. When bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() returns -ENOMEM.
> 2. When more sockets are added to the bucket while calling
>    bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(), making the updated batch size
>    insufficient.
> 
> In cases where the batch size only covers part of a bucket, it is
> possible to forget which sockets were already visited, especially if we
> have to process a bucket in more than two batches. This forces us to
> choose between repeating or skipping sockets, so don't allow this:
> 
> 1. Stop iteration and propagate -ENOMEM up to userspace if reallocation
>    fails instead of continuing with a partial batch.
> 2. Try bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() with GFP_USER just as before, but if
>    we still aren't able to capture the full bucket, call
>    bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() again while holding the bucket lock to
>    guarantee the bucket does not change. On the second attempt use
>    GFP_NOWAIT since we hold onto the spin lock.
> 
> I did some manual testing to exercise the code paths where GFP_NOWAIT is
> used and where ERR_PTR(err) is returned. I used the realloc test cases
> included later in this series to trigger a scenario where a realloc
> happens inside bpf_iter_tcp_batch and made a small code tweak to force
> the first realloc attempt to allocate a too-small batch, thus requiring
> another attempt with GFP_NOWAIT. Some printks showed both reallocs with
> the tests passing:
> 
> Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_USER
> Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_NOWAIT
> Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_USER
> Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_NOWAIT
> 
> With this setup, I also forced each of the bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch
> calls to return -ENOMEM to ensure that iteration ends and that the
> read() in userspace fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>

Looks more approachable now, thank you!

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration
  2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 18:32   ` Stanislav Fomichev
  2025-07-06 18:36     ` Jordan Rife
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2025-06-30 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jordan Rife
  Cc: netdev, bpf, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov

On 06/30, Jordan Rife wrote:
> Replace the offset-based approach for tracking progress through a bucket
> in the TCP table with one based on socket cookies. Remember the cookies
> of unprocessed sockets from the last batch and use this list to
> pick up where we left off or, in the case that the next socket
> disappears between reads, find the first socket after that point that
> still exists in the bucket and resume from there.
> 
> This approach guarantees that all sockets that existed when iteration
> began and continue to exist throughout will be visited exactly once.
> Sockets that are added to the table during iteration may or may not be
> seen, but if they are they will be seen exactly once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> index bb51d62066a4..510053836a3c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
>  #include <linux/times.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/sock_diag.h>
>  
>  #include <net/net_namespace.h>
>  #include <net/icmp.h>
> @@ -3016,6 +3017,7 @@ static int tcp4_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
>  union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item {
>  	struct sock *sk;
> +	__u64 cookie;
>  };
>  
>  struct bpf_tcp_iter_state {
> @@ -3046,10 +3048,19 @@ static int tcp_prog_seq_show(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta,
>  
>  static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter)
>  {
> +	union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item *item;
>  	unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
> +	__u64 cookie;
>  
> -	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
> -		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++].sk);
> +	/* Remember the cookies of the sockets we haven't seen yet, so we can
> +	 * pick up where we left off next time around.
> +	 */
> +	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk) {
> +		item = &iter->batch[cur_sk++];
> +		cookie = sock_gen_cookie(item->sk);
> +		sock_gen_put(item->sk);
> +		item->cookie = cookie;
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
> @@ -3070,6 +3081,106 @@ static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_resume_bucket(struct sock *first_sk,
> +					       union bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item *cookies,
> +					       int n_cookies)
> +{
> +	struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
> +	struct sock *sk;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < n_cookies; i++) {
> +		sk = first_sk;
> +		sk_nulls_for_each_from(sk, node) {
> +			if (cookies[i].cookie == atomic64_read(&sk->sk_cookie))
> +				return sk;
> +		}

nit: let's drop {} around sk_nulls_for_each_from?

> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_resume_listening(struct seq_file *seq)
> +{
> +	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
> +	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
> +	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
> +	unsigned int find_cookie = iter->cur_sk;
> +	unsigned int end_cookie = iter->end_sk;
> +	int resume_bucket = st->bucket;
> +	struct sock *sk;
> +
> +	if (end_cookie && find_cookie == end_cookie)
> +		++st->bucket;
> +
> +	sk = listening_get_first(seq);
> +	iter->cur_sk = 0;
> +	iter->end_sk = 0;
> +
> +	if (sk && st->bucket == resume_bucket && end_cookie) {
> +		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume_bucket(sk, &iter->batch[find_cookie],
> +						end_cookie - find_cookie);
> +		if (!sk) {
> +			spin_unlock(&hinfo->lhash2[st->bucket].lock);
> +			++st->bucket;
> +			sk = listening_get_first(seq);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return sk;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_resume_established(struct seq_file *seq)
> +{
> +	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = seq_file_net(seq)->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo;
> +	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
> +	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
> +	unsigned int find_cookie = iter->cur_sk;
> +	unsigned int end_cookie = iter->end_sk;
> +	int resume_bucket = st->bucket;
> +	struct sock *sk;
> +
> +	if (end_cookie && find_cookie == end_cookie)
> +		++st->bucket;
> +
> +	sk = established_get_first(seq);
> +	iter->cur_sk = 0;
> +	iter->end_sk = 0;
> +
> +	if (sk && st->bucket == resume_bucket && end_cookie) {
> +		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume_bucket(sk, &iter->batch[find_cookie],
> +						end_cookie - find_cookie);
> +		if (!sk) {
> +			spin_unlock_bh(inet_ehash_lockp(hinfo, st->bucket));
> +			++st->bucket;
> +			sk = established_get_first(seq);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return sk;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_resume(struct seq_file *seq)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
> +	struct tcp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
> +	struct sock *sk = NULL;
> +
> +	switch (st->state) {
> +	case TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING:
> +		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume_listening(seq);
> +		if (sk)
> +			break;
> +		st->bucket = 0;
> +		st->state = TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED;
> +		fallthrough;
> +	case TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED:
> +		sk = bpf_iter_tcp_resume_established(seq);

nit: add break here for consistency?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple states
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple states Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 18:34   ` Stanislav Fomichev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2025-06-30 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jordan Rife
  Cc: netdev, bpf, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov

On 06/30, Jordan Rife wrote:
> Add parentheses around loopback address check to fix up logic and make
> the socket state filter configurable for the TCP socket iterators.
> Iterators can skip the socket state check by setting ss to 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c        |  2 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c   | 11 ++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> index 0d0f1b4debff..afe0f55ead75 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
>  	skel->rodata->ports[0] = 0;
>  	skel->rodata->ports[1] = 0;
>  	skel->rodata->sf = tc->family;
> +	skel->rodata->ss = 0;
>  
>  	err = sock_iter_batch__load(skel);
>  	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "sock_iter_batch__load"))
> @@ -498,6 +499,7 @@ static void do_test(int sock_type, bool onebyone)
>  		skel->rodata->ports[i] = ntohs(local_port);
>  	}
>  	skel->rodata->sf = AF_INET6;

[..]

> +	skel->rodata->ss = TCP_LISTEN;

nit: let's maybe add `if (sock_type == SOCK_STREAM)` here? I see that you're
adding ss check only to the tcp prog, but let's also clearly state
the intent here..

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Create established sockets in socket iterator tests
  2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Create established sockets " Jordan Rife
@ 2025-06-30 18:47   ` Stanislav Fomichev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2025-06-30 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jordan Rife
  Cc: netdev, bpf, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov

On 06/30, Jordan Rife wrote:
> Prepare for bucket resume tests for established TCP sockets by creating
> established sockets. Collect socket fds from connect() and accept()
> sides and pass them to test cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@jrife.io>
> ---
>  .../bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c          | 83 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> index 4c145c5415f1..2b0504cb127b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> @@ -153,8 +153,66 @@ static void check_n_were_seen_once(int *fds, int fds_len, int n,
>  	ASSERT_EQ(seen_once, n, "seen_once");
>  }
>  
> +static int accept_from_one(int *server_fds, int server_fds_len)
> +{
> +	int i = 0;
> +	int fd;
> +

[..]

> +	for (; i < server_fds_len; i++) {

nit: move i=0 here?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration
  2025-06-30 18:32   ` Stanislav Fomichev
@ 2025-07-06 18:36     ` Jordan Rife
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Rife @ 2025-07-06 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Fomichev
  Cc: netdev, bpf, Daniel Borkmann, Martin KaFai Lau, Willem de Bruijn,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima, Alexei Starovoitov

> nit: let's drop {} around sk_nulls_for_each_from?
> nit: add break here for consistency?

Thanks for taking another look. Will address this and other nits in v4.

Jordan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-06 18:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-30 17:16 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: tcp: Exactly-once socket iteration Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: tcp: Make mem flags configurable through bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 18:31   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/12] bpf: tcp: Use bpf_tcp_iter_batch_item for bpf_tcp_iter_state batch items Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/12] bpf: tcp: Avoid socket skips and repeats during iteration Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 18:32   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-07-06 18:36     ` Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in listening sockets Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple ports Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration over multiple states Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 18:34   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: Make ehash buckets configurable in socket iterator tests Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: Create established sockets " Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 18:47   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: Create iter_tcp_destroy test program Jordan Rife
2025-06-30 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bucket resume logic in established sockets Jordan Rife

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).