From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8FF01EDA12; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 08:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751444933; cv=none; b=jhobTm1oMoGQaP+RNEnqNaZf8sw5pnoPrY1vvpspM7v/jUDOfS0luHr5a32JeuLGBUNFmpRpIDNzCHOiJOvSA9XHWpr11iBcZpPiav7gkmmhLZ5tzlXTmdKce9tOTGWOEk+Usi7hB38S2p8KeG5y7gMyAKDTmqQVR8nZJ6NC1eI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751444933; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HMhGhl+nGkttwlmKfCx46IPS/kNi+zmx1F2ZQiHf9Zk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=m2O7atUdTY3RzciZURQ3QZDdOroicJNRDb0/+Q4bM2aL8W/RukWUsLH/CN1GcgXNU2/oFH6hb3BFPT/32I910ytceSXr3blGFi6mOkoUNGvxfAQC9ufghawkE9WZaqPZb5jxM2izioDoCoXmsMfIQci4sLZhl7lFe3h8PFuTvGE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QYLmw7dE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QYLmw7dE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42C57C4CEEE; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 08:28:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751444933; bh=HMhGhl+nGkttwlmKfCx46IPS/kNi+zmx1F2ZQiHf9Zk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QYLmw7dEmPsd6RF01Odg6OhL8C5zww8nQEXsxMjQbj9dWVzEcfSKNY22SDl4f/iGB NBXf4bO3vGiwxCpLL5vB0E0UiTzCz/WS2k2ixoSoPDh1tFMQ1s9HnX2K0MRyQReNzm Q8IxVG1oxMhoYst9Jq8Kpz9K/D4wY2eWNCNlZKbJ6Ike6iaU43rewyK+0vOkF2ktTI Uomv+dqLF0K4ipfwh/TfUYZfThQnhE3olG7YyD4Mo6uthJpNLGxI54KgTc1nurCBL6 v46SF7ofRJ92PF5DexJ3hsEuvretl7/w8TLC3cWmVNb771QKYhHHi6OqzNx0oSCONz aon1AfQTIeI3A== Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 11:28:47 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Simon Horman Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Stav Aviram , Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Mark Bloch , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Saeed Mahameed , Tariq Toukan , Michal Swiatkowski Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next v1] net/mlx5: Check device memory pointer before usage Message-ID: <20250702082847.GH6278@unreal> References: <20250701193858.GA41770@horms.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250701193858.GA41770@horms.kernel.org> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 08:38:58PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 03:08:12PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > From: Stav Aviram > > > > Add a NULL check before accessing device memory to prevent a crash if > > dev->dm allocation in mlx5_init_once() fails. > > > > Fixes: c9b9dcb430b3 ("net/mlx5: Move device memory management to mlx5_core") > > Signed-off-by: Stav Aviram > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky > > --- > > Changelog: > > v1: > > * Removed extra IS_ERR(dm) check. > > v0: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/e389fa6ef075af1049cd7026b912d736ebe3ad23.1751279408.git.leonro@nvidia.com > > --- > > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/dm.c | 2 +- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/dm.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/dm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/dm.c > > index b4c97fb62abf..9ded2b7c1e31 100644 > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/dm.c > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/dm.c > > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static struct ib_dm *handle_alloc_dm_memic(struct ib_ucontext *ctx, > > int err; > > u64 address; > > > > - if (!MLX5_CAP_DEV_MEM(dm_db->dev, memic)) > > + if (!dm_db || !MLX5_CAP_DEV_MEM(dm_db->dev, memic)) > > return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP); > > nit: -EOPNOTSUPP doesn't feel like the right error code > in the !dm_db case. Why? This error is returned to the user through mlx5_ib_alloc_dm(). Thanks > > > > > dm = kzalloc(sizeof(*dm), GFP_KERNEL); > > ...