From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, bjorn@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, joe@dama.to,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: add a new test to check the consumer update case
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 19:28:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702112815.50746-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702112815.50746-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
The subtest sends 33 packets at one time on purpose to see if xsk
exitting __xsk_generic_xmit() updates the global consumer of tx queue
when reaching the max loop (max_tx_budget, 32 by default). The number 33
can avoid xskq_cons_peek_desc() updates the consumer when it's about to
quit sending, to accurately check if the issue that the first patch
resolves remains. The new case will not check this issue in zero copy
mode.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
---
v5
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250627085745.53173-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. use the initial approach to add a new testcase
2. add a new flag 'check_consumer' to see if the check is needed
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
index 0ced4026ee44..ed12a55ecf2a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
@@ -109,6 +109,8 @@
#include <network_helpers.h>
+#define MAX_TX_BUDGET_DEFAULT 32
+
static bool opt_verbose;
static bool opt_print_tests;
static enum test_mode opt_mode = TEST_MODE_ALL;
@@ -1091,11 +1093,45 @@ static bool is_pkt_valid(struct pkt *pkt, void *buffer, u64 addr, u32 len)
return true;
}
+static u32 load_value(u32 *counter)
+{
+ return __atomic_load_n(counter, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
+}
+
+static bool kick_tx_with_check(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int *ret)
+{
+ u32 max_budget = MAX_TX_BUDGET_DEFAULT;
+ u32 cons, ready_to_send;
+ int delta;
+
+ cons = load_value(xsk->tx.consumer);
+ ready_to_send = load_value(xsk->tx.producer) - cons;
+ *ret = sendto(xsk_socket__fd(xsk->xsk), NULL, 0, MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, 0);
+
+ delta = load_value(xsk->tx.consumer) - cons;
+ /* By default, xsk should consume exact @max_budget descs at one
+ * send in this case where hitting the max budget limit in while
+ * loop is triggered in __xsk_generic_xmit(). Please make sure that
+ * the number of descs to be sent is larger than @max_budget, or
+ * else the tx.consumer will be updated in xskq_cons_peek_desc()
+ * in time which hides the issue we try to verify.
+ */
+ if (ready_to_send > max_budget && delta != max_budget)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int kick_tx(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk)
{
int ret;
- ret = sendto(xsk_socket__fd(xsk->xsk), NULL, 0, MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, 0);
+ if (xsk->check_consumer) {
+ if (!kick_tx_with_check(xsk, &ret))
+ return TEST_FAILURE;
+ } else {
+ ret = sendto(xsk_socket__fd(xsk->xsk), NULL, 0, MSG_DONTWAIT, NULL, 0);
+ }
if (ret >= 0)
return TEST_PASS;
if (errno == ENOBUFS || errno == EAGAIN || errno == EBUSY || errno == ENETDOWN) {
@@ -2613,6 +2649,18 @@ static int testapp_adjust_tail_grow_mb(struct test_spec *test)
XSK_UMEM__LARGE_FRAME_SIZE * 2);
}
+static int testapp_tx_queue_consumer(struct test_spec *test)
+{
+ int nr_packets = MAX_TX_BUDGET_DEFAULT + 1;
+
+ pkt_stream_replace(test, nr_packets, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
+ test->ifobj_tx->xsk->batch_size = nr_packets;
+ if (!(test->mode & TEST_MODE_ZC))
+ test->ifobj_tx->xsk->check_consumer = true;
+
+ return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
+}
+
static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test)
{
int ret;
@@ -2723,6 +2771,7 @@ static const struct test_spec tests[] = {
{.name = "XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_SHRINK_MULTI_BUFF", .test_func = testapp_adjust_tail_shrink_mb},
{.name = "XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_GROW", .test_func = testapp_adjust_tail_grow},
{.name = "XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_GROW_MULTI_BUFF", .test_func = testapp_adjust_tail_grow_mb},
+ {.name = "TX_QUEUE_CONSUMER", .test_func = testapp_tx_queue_consumer},
};
static void print_tests(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
index 67fc44b2813b..4df3a5d329ac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct xsk_socket_info {
u32 batch_size;
u8 dst_mac[ETH_ALEN];
u8 src_mac[ETH_ALEN];
+ bool check_consumer;
};
struct pkt {
--
2.41.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 11:28 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] net: xsk: update tx queue consumer Jason Xing
2025-07-02 11:28 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net: xsk: update tx queue consumer immediately after transmission Jason Xing
2025-07-02 11:28 ` Jason Xing [this message]
2025-07-02 16:03 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: add a new test to check the consumer update case Stanislav Fomichev
2025-07-02 23:09 ` Jason Xing
2025-07-03 12:37 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-07-03 13:16 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250702112815.50746-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--to=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@dama.to \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).