* [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
@ 2025-07-05 16:36 Xin Guo
2025-07-05 18:24 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-07-08 16:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xin Guo @ 2025-07-05 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ncardwell, edumazet, davem, dsahern, kuba, pabeni; +Cc: netdev, Xin Guo
As RACK-TLP was published as a standards-track RFC8985,
so the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack need to be updated.
Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@gmail.com>
---
v1:including the other two ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
---
Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst | 2 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
index 2cad74e18f71..14700ea77e75 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ tcp_dsack - BOOLEAN
tcp_early_retrans - INTEGER
Tail loss probe (TLP) converts RTOs occurring due to tail
- losses into fast recovery (draft-ietf-tcpm-rack). Note that
+ losses into fast recovery (RFC8985). Note that
TLP requires RACK to function properly (see tcp_recovery below)
Possible values:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 79e3bfb0108f..e9e654f09180 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3714,7 +3714,7 @@ static int tcp_replace_ts_recent(struct tcp_sock *tp, u32 seq)
}
/* This routine deals with acks during a TLP episode and ends an episode by
- * resetting tlp_high_seq. Ref: TLP algorithm in draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
+ * resetting tlp_high_seq. Ref: TLP algorithm in RFC8985
*/
static void tcp_process_tlp_ack(struct sock *sk, u32 ack, int flag)
{
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
index bba10110fbbc..c52fd3254b6e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ s32 tcp_rack_skb_timeout(struct tcp_sock *tp, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 reo_wnd)
tcp_stamp_us_delta(tp->tcp_mstamp, tcp_skb_timestamp_us(skb));
}
-/* RACK loss detection (IETF draft draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-01):
+/* RACK loss detection (IETF RFC8985):
*
* Marks a packet lost, if some packet sent later has been (s)acked.
* The underlying idea is similar to the traditional dupthresh and FACK
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
2025-07-05 16:36 [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack Xin Guo
@ 2025-07-05 18:24 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-07-05 23:24 ` Xin Guo
2025-07-08 16:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neal Cardwell @ 2025-07-05 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xin Guo; +Cc: edumazet, davem, dsahern, kuba, pabeni, netdev, Yuchung Cheng
On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Xin Guo <guoxin0309@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As RACK-TLP was published as a standards-track RFC8985,
> so the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack need to be updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Looks good to me.
BTW, normally I think a second version of a patch like this would be
marked as v2 rather than v1. (That is, the first post of a patch is
implicitly v1.) But AFAIK there's no need to resend. :-)
Thanks!
neal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
2025-07-05 18:24 ` Neal Cardwell
@ 2025-07-05 23:24 ` Xin Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xin Guo @ 2025-07-05 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neal Cardwell
Cc: edumazet, davem, dsahern, kuba, pabeni, netdev, Yuchung Cheng
Thanks neal, have a nice weekend!
Regards
Guo Xin.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:24 AM Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Xin Guo <guoxin0309@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As RACK-TLP was published as a standards-track RFC8985,
> > so the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack need to be updated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> BTW, normally I think a second version of a patch like this would be
> marked as v2 rather than v1. (That is, the first post of a patch is
> implicitly v1.) But AFAIK there's no need to resend. :-)
>
> Thanks!
>
> neal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
2025-07-05 16:36 [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack Xin Guo
2025-07-05 18:24 ` Neal Cardwell
@ 2025-07-08 16:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-07-08 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xin Guo; +Cc: ncardwell, edumazet, davem, dsahern, kuba, pabeni, netdev
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 00:36:47 +0800 you wrote:
> As RACK-TLP was published as a standards-track RFC8985,
> so the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack need to be updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1:including the other two ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/19c066f94066
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-08 16:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-05 16:36 [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack Xin Guo
2025-07-05 18:24 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-07-05 23:24 ` Xin Guo
2025-07-08 16:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox