From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 744732E5B3E for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 19:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752001600; cv=none; b=J9NQR95G0hHZmSehClBeoOi9FDvMz7da8LWVWw74ABf6gtnZDystf4fd7y/RspEChXS7G843vPHbHqMThGFljUbr6vlsbqhjFHlkeQ8OhAU+x60AYE9sAcNwMeJNQb0G7hOvmH51kEvDPvba7yAyfrRtgLrzPP31QZXqswzryz4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752001600; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DlUlzmq1XBA7NBkVzqscejjs37rD2o/CbIOz3pFjXzQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oby0Gl5FQQXOnfeXMusfnctAWFAEnPfsUrA5paM27CRmOejyhuOConutT9mKA2nBiGzuaQbQegL0X0c3KyiG+DP7uNhHpqoaKx3TDz8Z3iGcyfjqtg/QVzQDomPq5EXGtiOl+pEDb9KJljuBdw3NGNBRRvRg6cmaUtpfA+cMvng= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fryarhpI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fryarhpI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E99D3C4CEED; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 19:06:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752001600; bh=DlUlzmq1XBA7NBkVzqscejjs37rD2o/CbIOz3pFjXzQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fryarhpIK+1nP7tSgoPcDvxI9XjtY+Hli2RSEAqJ4O9AK/HR81cZROSRp+wPlcQ7y iVjB/LFs7eZE55MzPELBmpBAmLczTovO5lCJiD3YG7rX+buEhZXrU3DUfEidusZPwk t2Zo1TYe0sjPJZqWIgG8+LK5G/Gf3Gl4hiLQJWn6fPbT1GfsD7m0cUXTOmvgGmKXQu U+aofVBWnsfZYyL+77DDDexbpDCOI0BgvYG7viab7Zhk67wruk+5Fs9d+xavMOx/Cp UjiWP4nSa4Q0cUcYHgtxSCroRDTPAyw8S0n9PARX4PpcePNDTaL+fcGKz1Hormv8wg nTExBnBWr09yQ== Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 20:06:35 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Jacek Kowalski Cc: Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/5] e1000: drop unnecessary constant casts to u16 Message-ID: <20250708190635.GW452973@horms.kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 10:16:52AM +0200, Jacek Kowalski wrote: > Remove unnecessary casts of constant values to u16. > Let the C type system do it's job. > > Signed-off-by: Jacek Kowalski > Suggested-by: Simon Horman > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c > index d06d29c6c037..d152026a027b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c > @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int e1000_eeprom_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u64 *data) > } > > /* If Checksum is not Correct return error else test passed */ > - if ((checksum != (u16)EEPROM_SUM) && !(*data)) > + if ((checksum != EEPROM_SUM) && !(*data)) > *data = 2; nit: If there is a v3 for some other reason, then I think you could also drop the inner parentheses here. > > return *data; > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c > index f9328f2e669f..0e5de52b1067 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c > @@ -3970,7 +3970,7 @@ s32 e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw) > return E1000_SUCCESS; > > #endif > - if (checksum == (u16)EEPROM_SUM) > + if (checksum == EEPROM_SUM) > return E1000_SUCCESS; > else { > e_dbg("EEPROM Checksum Invalid\n"); > @@ -3997,7 +3997,7 @@ s32 e1000_update_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw) > } > checksum += eeprom_data; > } > - checksum = (u16)EEPROM_SUM - checksum; > + checksum = EEPROM_SUM - checksum; > if (e1000_write_eeprom(hw, EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG, 1, &checksum) < 0) { > e_dbg("EEPROM Write Error\n"); > return -E1000_ERR_EEPROM; > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c > index d8595e84326d..09acba2ed483 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c > @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void e1000_update_mng_vlan(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) > } else { > adapter->mng_vlan_id = E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE; > } > - if ((old_vid != (u16)E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE) && > + if ((old_vid != E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE) && Ditto. But more importantly, both Clang 20.1.7 W=1 builds (or at any rate, builds with -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare), and Smatch complain that the comparison above is now always true because E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE is -1, while old_vid is unsigned. Perhaps E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE should be updated to be UINT16_MAX? > (vid != old_vid) && > !test_bit(old_vid, adapter->active_vlans)) > e1000_vlan_rx_kill_vid(netdev, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), > -- > 2.47.2 >