From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738AD253F2D for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752505094; cv=none; b=a1xMNBKiKzMFW3WwfUooAnpsQoe79Yyl3pLrOjiZQMsptuizMyEZj+iQeD+WwmitYG4kO4OL7zHw82QtWERK2YmqaJsDF+EdN41VeG8fI1jH2jV8O/GdskxxjdNpUXv5sHhzfQTI1VTsLqUhaZ4I/omJgtOmejOrXapYMaXqfjo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752505094; c=relaxed/simple; bh=C5eyEDFv4nwgx18b0gkYabeNyMzfmzsJGMHUO9ziknE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Nup03eIhiGfa5pybRv1OT7N4qynV69GrVSv5agRxS+R7uxwtyDWpBVGMad3lokDieEXyv8WHJarzxhYk49laBn6YciKs6oB6pvKu9cMDv75oeXc4d/eMdHMVdaB0HFVF2PL1rbHZa6wM/OOY83jxV2I8lXNd9Fkls446eZ5E3lk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HrOilTh7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HrOilTh7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 935FCC4CEED; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:58:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752505094; bh=C5eyEDFv4nwgx18b0gkYabeNyMzfmzsJGMHUO9ziknE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HrOilTh7MQ3a6Vj2AmxUAktMb1VW6crNILq2KGgq7bROJXZ5cavJWmpLE9NpDcwL4 OV21j6Q7ktUXgpwyonFpUnT/Vrj4eCrGyGPi6UQQBBAqIgZUGKJUHBLImQ0oaW8AlX AbOyMdY5gUPyY+NqkMyJRnu57EC//qsSmtq9GAt4BVvcFZJuFb7P/CAgjPAJYaCsI+ APPRTFhWUjqZ+8Z9OM8GjuNR40QO00drBCkATzBrtba+0LNod1ZIzwYuMZSJomvqQ6 T9YNg3xatAFRkp0i6t+ptvs+78yF1FHzjUHIXWjbZliBJVImhYFT5thGyIp0z8LPKc F7tM4BJRwiJow== Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 07:58:12 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: William Liu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, victor@mojatatu.com, pctammela@mojatatu.com, pabeni@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, dcaratti@redhat.com, savy@syst3mfailure.io, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5 1/2] net/sched: Restrict conditions for adding duplicating netems to qdisc tree Message-ID: <20250714075812.3e9adfed@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250708164141.875402-1-will@willsroot.io> <20250711155506.48bbb351@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 12 Jul 2025 16:51:39 +0000 William Liu wrote: > > We already had one regression scare this week, so given that Cong > > is not relenting I'll do the unusual thing of parking this fix in > > net-next. It will reach Linus during the merge window, hopefully > > the <2 week delay is not a big deal given how long we've taken already. > > If this is going to net-next, will this still be a candidate for > backporting like other recent net/sched bug-fixes? Or will this only > be considered fixed starting 6.17 onwards? It will be a candidate for backporting once it reaches Linus. The only difference is timing.