From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Wang Haoran <haoranwangsec@gmail.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: We found a bug in i40e_debugfs.c for the latest linux
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 19:10:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250714181032.GS721198@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANZ3JQRRiOdtfQJoP9QM=6LS1Jto8PGBGw6y7-TL=BcnzHQn1Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 10:14:18AM +0800, Wang Haoran wrote:
> Hi, my name is Wang Haoran. We found a bug in the
> i40e_dbg_command_read function located in
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c in the latest Linux
> kernel (version 6.15.5).
> The buffer "i40e_dbg_command_buf" has a size of 256. When formatted
> together with the network device name (name), a newline character, and
> a null terminator, the total formatted string length may exceed the
> buffer size of 256 bytes.
> Since "snprintf" returns the total number of bytes that would have
> been written (the length of "%s: %s\n" ), this value may exceed the
> buffer length passed to copy_to_user(), this will ultimatly cause
> function "copy_to_user" report a buffer overflow error.
> Replacing snprintf with scnprintf ensures the return value never
> exceeds the specified buffer size, preventing such issues.
Thanks Wang Haoran.
I agree that using scnprintf() is a better choice here than snprintf().
But it is not clear to me that this is a bug.
I see that i40e_dbg_command_buf is initialised to be the
empty string. And I don't see it's contents being updated.
While ->name should be no longer than IFNAMSIZ - 1 (=15) bytes long,
excluding the trailing '\0'.
If so, the string formatted by the line below should always
comfortably fit within buf_size (256 bytes).
>
> --- i40e_debugfs.c 2025-07-06 17:04:26.000000000 +0800
> +++ i40e_debugfs.c 2025-07-09 15:51:47.259130500 +0800
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> main_vsi = i40e_pf_get_main_vsi(pf);
> - len = snprintf(buf, buf_size, "%s: %s\n", main_vsi->netdev->name,
> + len = scnprintf(buf, buf_size, "%s: %s\n", main_vsi->netdev->name,
> i40e_dbg_command_buf);
>
> bytes_not_copied = copy_to_user(buffer, buf, len);
>
> Best regards,
> Wang Haoran
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-14 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-10 2:14 We found a bug in i40e_debugfs.c for the latest linux Wang Haoran
2025-07-14 18:10 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-15 13:38 ` Wang Haoran
2025-07-15 16:55 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-15 17:12 ` Jacob Keller
2025-07-16 8:37 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-16 12:52 ` Wang Haoran
2025-07-17 17:03 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250714181032.GS721198@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoranwangsec@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).