From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: receiver changes
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:33:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715063314.43a993f9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250715062829.0408857d@kernel.org>
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:28:29 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> # (null):17: error handling packet: timing error: expected outbound packet at 0.074144 sec but happened at -1752585909.757339 sec; tolerance 0.004000 sec
> # script packet: 0.074144 S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 0>
> # actual packet: -1752585909.757339 S.0 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 0>
This is definitely compiler related, I rebuilt with clang and the build
error goes away. Now I get a more sane failure:
# tcp_rcv_big_endseq.pkt:41: error handling packet: timing error: expected outbound packet at 1.230105 sec but happened at 1.190101 sec; tolerance 0.005046 sec
# script packet: 1.230105 . 1:1(0) ack 54001 win 0
# actual packet: 1.190101 . 1:1(0) ack 54001 win 0
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 15.1.1 20250521 (Red Hat 15.1.1-2)
I don't understand why the ack is supposed to be delayed, should we
just do this? (I think Eric is OOO, FWIW)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/tcp_rcv_big_endseq.pkt b/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/tcp_rcv_big_endseq.pkt
index 7e170b94fd36..3848b419e68c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/tcp_rcv_big_endseq.pkt
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/packetdrill/tcp_rcv_big_endseq.pkt
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
// If queue is empty, accept a packet even if its end_seq is above wup + rcv_wnd
+0 < P. 4001:54001(50000) ack 1 win 257
- +.040 > . 1:1(0) ack 54001 win 0
+ +0 > . 1:1(0) ack 54001 win 0
// Check LINUX_MIB_BEYOND_WINDOW has been incremented 3 times.
+0 `nstat | grep TcpExtBeyondWindow | grep -q " 3 "`
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 11:39 [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: receiver changes Eric Dumazet
2025-07-11 11:39 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] tcp: do not accept packets beyond window Eric Dumazet
2025-07-12 20:52 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-15 1:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-11 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] tcp: add LINUX_MIB_BEYOND_WINDOW Eric Dumazet
2025-07-12 20:55 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] selftests/net: packetdrill: add tcp_rcv_big_endseq.pkt Eric Dumazet
2025-07-12 20:58 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] tcp: call tcp_measure_rcv_mss() for ooo packets Eric Dumazet
2025-07-12 21:11 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] selftests/net: packetdrill: add tcp_ooo_rcv_mss.pkt Eric Dumazet
2025-07-12 21:42 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] tcp: add const to tcp_try_rmem_schedule() and sk_rmem_schedule() skb Eric Dumazet
2025-07-12 21:43 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] tcp: stronger sk_rcvbuf checks Eric Dumazet
2025-07-12 21:54 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-11 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] selftests/net: packetdrill: add tcp_rcv_toobig.pkt Eric Dumazet
2025-07-12 21:57 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-15 2:20 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: receiver changes patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-07-15 8:25 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-15 9:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-07-15 10:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-15 10:40 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-07-15 13:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-15 13:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-07-15 13:52 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-07-15 14:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-15 14:48 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-07-15 13:50 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250715063314.43a993f9@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).