From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
"Junvyyang, Tencent Zhuque Lab" <zhuque@tencent.com>,
LePremierHomme <kwqcheii@proton.me>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/5] rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable()
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:53:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250716115307.3572606-2-dhowells@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250716115307.3572606-1-dhowells@redhat.com>
The rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find
out the MTU size for a route. When accepting an incoming call, this is
called from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled
across the code that calls down to it. Unfortunately, the IP layer uses
local_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are
enabled:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0
rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0
__mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460
ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140
ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90
rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590
rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120
rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400
rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0
rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900
rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60
kthread+0x2f7/0x310
ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
...
hardirqs last enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
hardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70
softirqs last enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730
softirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90
Fix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of
rxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without
interrupts disabled.
It shouldn't be a problem for rxrpc_new_incoming_call() to do it after the
locks are dropped as pmtud is going to be performed by the I/O thread - and
we're in the I/O thread at this point.
Fixes: a2ea9a907260 ("rxrpc: Use irq-disabling spinlocks between app and I/O thread")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Junvyyang, Tencent Zhuque Lab <zhuque@tencent.com>
cc: LePremierHomme <kwqcheii@proton.me>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h | 1 +
net/rxrpc/call_accept.c | 1 +
net/rxrpc/peer_object.c | 6 ++----
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index 376e33dce8c1..df1a618dbf7d 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -1383,6 +1383,7 @@ struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_lookup_peer_rcu(struct rxrpc_local *,
const struct sockaddr_rxrpc *);
struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_lookup_peer(struct rxrpc_local *local,
struct sockaddr_rxrpc *srx, gfp_t gfp);
+void rxrpc_assess_MTU_size(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct rxrpc_peer *peer);
struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_alloc_peer(struct rxrpc_local *, gfp_t,
enum rxrpc_peer_trace);
void rxrpc_new_incoming_peer(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct rxrpc_peer *peer);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c b/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
index 49fccee1a726..226b4bf82747 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
@@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ bool rxrpc_new_incoming_call(struct rxrpc_local *local,
spin_unlock(&rx->incoming_lock);
read_unlock_irq(&local->services_lock);
+ rxrpc_assess_MTU_size(local, call->peer);
if (hlist_unhashed(&call->error_link)) {
spin_lock_irq(&call->peer->lock);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
index e2f35e6c04d6..366431b0736c 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/peer_object.c
@@ -149,8 +149,7 @@ struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_lookup_peer_rcu(struct rxrpc_local *local,
* assess the MTU size for the network interface through which this peer is
* reached
*/
-static void rxrpc_assess_MTU_size(struct rxrpc_local *local,
- struct rxrpc_peer *peer)
+void rxrpc_assess_MTU_size(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct rxrpc_peer *peer)
{
struct net *net = local->net;
struct dst_entry *dst;
@@ -277,8 +276,6 @@ static void rxrpc_init_peer(struct rxrpc_local *local, struct rxrpc_peer *peer,
peer->hdrsize += sizeof(struct rxrpc_wire_header);
peer->max_data = peer->if_mtu - peer->hdrsize;
-
- rxrpc_assess_MTU_size(local, peer);
}
/*
@@ -297,6 +294,7 @@ static struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_create_peer(struct rxrpc_local *local,
if (peer) {
memcpy(&peer->srx, srx, sizeof(*srx));
rxrpc_init_peer(local, peer, hash_key);
+ rxrpc_assess_MTU_size(local, peer);
}
_leave(" = %p", peer);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 11:52 [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2025-07-16 11:53 ` David Howells [this message]
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 2/5] rxrpc: Fix recv-recv race of completed call David Howells
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 3/5] rxrpc: Fix notification vs call-release vs recvmsg David Howells
2025-07-16 19:00 ` Simon Horman
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 4/5] rxrpc: Fix transmission of an abort in response to an abort David Howells
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 5/5] rxrpc: Fix to use conn aborts for conn-wide failures David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250716115307.3572606-2-dhowells@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kwqcheii@proton.me \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhuque@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).