From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
"Junvyyang, Tencent Zhuque Lab" <zhuque@tencent.com>,
LePremierHomme <kwqcheii@proton.me>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/5] rxrpc: Fix notification vs call-release vs recvmsg
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 20:00:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250716190001.GR721198@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250716115307.3572606-4-dhowells@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 12:53:02PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> When a call is released, rxrpc takes the spinlock and removes it from
> ->recvmsg_q in an effort to prevent racing recvmsg() invocations from
> seeing the same call. Now, rxrpc_recvmsg() only takes the spinlock when
> actually removing a call from the queue; it doesn't, however, take it in
> the lead up to that when it checks to see if the queue is empty. It *does*
> hold the socket lock, which prevents a recvmsg/recvmsg race - but this
> doesn't prevent sendmsg from ending the call because sendmsg() drops the
> socket lock and relies on the call->user_mutex.
>
> Fix this by firstly removing the bit in rxrpc_release_call() that dequeues
> the released call and, instead, rely on recvmsg() to simply discard
> released calls (done in a preceding fix).
>
> Secondly, rxrpc_notify_socket() is abandoned if the call is already marked
> as released rather than trying to be clever by setting both pointers in
> call->recvmsg_link to NULL to trick list_empty(). This isn't perfect and
> can still race, resulting in a released call on the queue, but recvmsg()
> will now clean that up.
>
> Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
...
> diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
...
> @@ -638,6 +628,12 @@ void rxrpc_release_calls_on_socket(struct rxrpc_sock *rx)
> rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put_release_sock);
> }
>
> + while ((call = list_first_entry_or_null(&rx->recvmsg_q,
> + struct rxrpc_call, recvmsg_link))) {
> + list_del_init(&call->recvmsg_link);
> + rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put_release_recvmsg_q);
> + }
> +
> _leave("");
> }
>
Hi David,
I believe it is addressed in patch 5/5.
But unfortunately this change breaks bisection.
.../call_object.c:634:24: error: use of undeclared identifier 'rxrpc_call_put_release_recvmsg_q'
634 | rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put_release_recvmsg_q);
| ^
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 11:52 [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes David Howells
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 1/5] rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable() David Howells
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 2/5] rxrpc: Fix recv-recv race of completed call David Howells
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 3/5] rxrpc: Fix notification vs call-release vs recvmsg David Howells
2025-07-16 19:00 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 4/5] rxrpc: Fix transmission of an abort in response to an abort David Howells
2025-07-16 11:53 ` [PATCH net 5/5] rxrpc: Fix to use conn aborts for conn-wide failures David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250716190001.GR721198@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kwqcheii@proton.me \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhuque@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).