netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Aliaksei Makarau <Aliaksei.Makarau@ibm.com>,
	Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] s390/ism: fix concurrency management in ism_cmd()
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 23:11:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250720211110.1962169-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

The s390x ISM device data sheet clearly states that only one
request-response sequence is allowable per ISM function at any point in
time.  Unfortunately as of today the s390/ism driver in Linux does not
honor that requirement. This patch aims to rectify that.

This problem was discovered based on Aliaksei's bug report which states
that for certain workloads the ISM functions end up entering error state
(with PEC 2 as seen from the logs) after a while and as a consequence
connections handled by the respective function break, and for future
connection requests the ISM device is not considered -- given it is in a
dysfunctional state. During further debugging PEC 31 was observed as
well.

The kernel message
zpci: XXXX:00:00.0: Event 0x2 reports an error for PCI function XXXX
is a reliable indicator of the stated function entering error state
with PEC 2. Let me also point out that the kernel message
zpci: XXXX:00:00.0: The ism driver bound to the device does not support error recovery
is a reliable indicator that the ISM function won't be auto-recovered
because the ISM driver currently lacks support for it.

On a technical level, without this synchronization, commands (inputs to
the FW) may be partially or fully overwritten (corrupted) by another CPU
trying to issue commands on the same function. There is hard evidence that
this can lead to DMB token values being used as DMB IOVAs, leading to
PEC 2 PCI events indicating invalid DMA. But this is only one of the
failure modes imaginable. In theory even completely losing one command
and executing another one twice and then trying to interpret the outputs
as if the command we intended to execute was actually executed and not
the other one is also possible.  Frankly I don't feel confident about
providing an exhaustive list of possible consequences.

Fixes: 684b89bc39ce ("s390/ism: add device driver for internal shared memory")
Reported-by: Aliaksei Makarau <Aliaksei.Makarau@ibm.com>
Tested-by: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Aliaksei Makarau <Aliaksei.Makarau@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c | 4 ++++
 include/linux/ism.h        | 1 +
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c b/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
index b7f15f303ea2..c3b79e22044c 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c
@@ -129,7 +129,9 @@ static int ism_cmd(struct ism_dev *ism, void *cmd)
 {
 	struct ism_req_hdr *req = cmd;
 	struct ism_resp_hdr *resp = cmd;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&ism->cmd_lock, flags);
 	__ism_write_cmd(ism, req + 1, sizeof(*req), req->len - sizeof(*req));
 	__ism_write_cmd(ism, req, 0, sizeof(*req));
 
@@ -143,6 +145,7 @@ static int ism_cmd(struct ism_dev *ism, void *cmd)
 	}
 	__ism_read_cmd(ism, resp + 1, sizeof(*resp), resp->len - sizeof(*resp));
 out:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ism->cmd_lock, flags);
 	return resp->ret;
 }
 
@@ -606,6 +609,7 @@ static int ism_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&ism->lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&ism->cmd_lock);
 	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ism);
 	ism->pdev = pdev;
 	ism->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
diff --git a/include/linux/ism.h b/include/linux/ism.h
index 5428edd90982..8358b4cd7ba6 100644
--- a/include/linux/ism.h
+++ b/include/linux/ism.h
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct ism_dmb {
 
 struct ism_dev {
 	spinlock_t lock; /* protects the ism device */
+	spinlock_t cmd_lock; /* serializes cmds */
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
 

base-commit: 07fa9cad54609df3eea00cd5b167df6088ce01a6
-- 
2.48.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-07-20 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-20 21:11 Halil Pasic [this message]
2025-07-21  7:30 ` [PATCH 1/1] s390/ism: fix concurrency management in ism_cmd() Alexander Gordeev
2025-07-21  8:17   ` Alexandra Winter
2025-07-21  9:56     ` Simon Horman
2025-07-21 10:35     ` Halil Pasic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250720211110.1962169-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Aliaksei.Makarau@ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).