From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
donald.hunter@gmail.com, pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com,
gal@nvidia.com, andrew@lunn.ch, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] eth: bnxt: support RSS on IPv6 Flow Label
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 10:30:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250723103001.79eb35fa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKFLi=EdZ1zisGZHZYQzqttQZx+8-vnoq5==mD98Tv80d1qxA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:57:14 -0700 Michael Chan wrote:
> Here, it needs to be something like this so that we only set the flag
> for 2-tuple or 3-tuple. The FW call will fail if both flags are set:
>
> if (!tuple || tuple == 2)
> rss_hash_cfg &= ~VNIC_RSS_CFG_REQ_HASH_TYPE_IPV6;
> if (tuple == 2) {
> if (cmd->data & RXH_IP6_FL)
> rss_hash_cfg |=
> VNIC_RSS_CFG_REQ_HASH_TYPE_IPV6_FLOW_LABEL;
> else
> rss_hash_cfg |= VNIC_RSS_CFG_REQ_HASH_TYPE_IPV6;
> }
Thanks for the help! Thinking thru this carefully I'm worried this will
leave the FLOW_LABEL bit in place if we switch from FL to 4-tuple.
Tho, I'm not clear on how 0-tuple to 4-tuple switch works at present.
Would this look good to you?
case TCP_V6_FLOW:
case UDP_V6_FLOW:
case SCTP_V6_FLOW:
case AH_ESP_V6_FLOW:
case AH_V6_FLOW:
case ESP_V6_FLOW:
case IPV6_FLOW:
rss_hash_cfg &= ~(VNIC_RSS_CFG_REQ_HASH_TYPE_IPV6 |
VNIC_RSS_CFG_REQ_HASH_TYPE_IPV6_FLOW_LABEL);
if (!tuple)
break;
if (cmd->data & RXH_IP6_FL)
rss_hash_cfg |=
VNIC_RSS_CFG_REQ_HASH_TYPE_IPV6_FLOW_LABEL;
else
rss_hash_cfg |= VNIC_RSS_CFG_REQ_HASH_TYPE_IPV6;
break;
or should the else branch have
else if (tuple == 2)
?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-23 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-22 1:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: ethtool: support including Flow Label in the flow hash for RSS Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-22 1:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] " Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-22 1:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] eth: fbnic: support RSS on IPv6 Flow Label Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-22 1:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] eth: bnxt: " Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-22 7:57 ` Michael Chan
2025-07-23 17:30 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-07-22 1:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] selftests: drv-net: add test for RSS on flow label Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-23 13:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250723103001.79eb35fa@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pavan.chebbi@broadcom.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).