netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Joshua Hay <joshua.a.hay@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/6] idpf: replace Tx flow scheduling buffer ring with buffer pool
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:08:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250723150835.GF1036606@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250718002150.2724409-1-joshua.a.hay@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 05:21:44PM -0700, Joshua Hay wrote:
> This series fixes a stability issue in the flow scheduling Tx send/clean
> path that results in a Tx timeout.
> 
> The existing guardrails in the Tx path were not sufficient to prevent
> the driver from reusing completion tags that were still in flight (held
> by the HW).  This collision would cause the driver to erroneously clean
> the wrong packet thus leaving the descriptor ring in a bad state.
> 
> The main point of this refactor is to replace the flow scheduling buffer
> ring with a large pool/array of buffers.  The completion tag then simply
> is the index into this array.  The driver tracks the free tags and pulls
> the next free one from a refillq.  The cleaning routines simply use the
> completion tag from the completion descriptor to index into the array to
> quickly find the buffers to clean.
> 
> All of the code to support the refactor is added first to ensure traffic
> still passes with each patch.  The final patch then removes all of the
> obsolete stashing code.
> 
> ---
> v2:
> - Add a new patch "idpf: simplify and fix splitq Tx packet rollback
>   error path" that fixes a bug in the error path. It also sets up
>   changes in patch 4 that are necessary to prevent a crash when a packet
>   rollback occurs using the buffer pool.
> 
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/c6444d15-bc20-41a8-9230-9bb266cb2ac6@molgen.mpg.de/T/#maf9f464c598951ee860e5dd24ef8a451a488c5a0
> 
> Joshua Hay (6):
>   idpf: add support for Tx refillqs in flow scheduling mode
>   idpf: improve when to set RE bit logic
>   idpf: simplify and fix splitq Tx packet rollback error path
>   idpf: replace flow scheduling buffer ring with buffer pool
>   idpf: stop Tx if there are insufficient buffer resources
>   idpf: remove obsolete stashing code
> 
>  .../ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_singleq_txrx.c   |  61 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c   | 723 +++++++-----------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.h   |  87 +--
>  3 files changed, 356 insertions(+), 515 deletions(-)

Hi Joshua, all,

Perhaps it is not followed much anymore, but at least according to [1]
patches for stable should not be more than 100 lines, with context.

This patch-set is an order of magnitude larger.
Can something be done to create a more minimal fix?

[1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#stable-kernel-rules

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-23 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-18  0:21 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/6] idpf: replace Tx flow scheduling buffer ring with buffer pool Joshua Hay
2025-07-18  0:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 1/6] idpf: add support for Tx refillqs in flow scheduling mode Joshua Hay
2025-07-21 15:05   ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-07-18  0:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 2/6] idpf: improve when to set RE bit logic Joshua Hay
2025-07-18  0:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 3/6] idpf: simplify and fix splitq Tx packet rollback error path Joshua Hay
2025-07-18  0:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 4/6] idpf: replace flow scheduling buffer ring with buffer pool Joshua Hay
2025-07-24  9:20   ` Simon Horman
2025-07-25 17:15     ` Hay, Joshua A
2025-07-18  0:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 5/6] idpf: stop Tx if there are insufficient buffer resources Joshua Hay
2025-07-18  0:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 6/6] idpf: remove obsolete stashing code Joshua Hay
2025-07-23 15:08 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-24  0:03   ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v2 0/6] idpf: replace Tx flow scheduling buffer ring with buffer pool Hay, Joshua A
2025-07-24  9:14     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250723150835.GF1036606@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=joshua.a.hay@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).