netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: Add sockaddr_inet unified address structure
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:46:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250723154647.GI1036606@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250722171528.work.209-kees@kernel.org>

+ Iwashima-san and Willem

  This series looks like something you should review

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:18:30AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Repeating patch 1, as it has the rationale:
> 
>     There are cases in networking (e.g. wireguard, sctp) where a union is
>     used to provide coverage for either IPv4 or IPv6 network addresses,
>     and they include an embedded "struct sockaddr" as well (for "sa_family"
>     and raw "sa_data" access). The current struct sockaddr contains a
>     flexible array, which means these unions should not be further embedded
>     in other structs because they do not technically have a fixed size (and
>     are generating warnings for the coming -Wflexible-array-not-at-end flag
>     addition). But the future changes to make struct sockaddr a fixed size
>     (i.e. with a 14 byte sa_data member) make the "sa_data" uses with an IPv6
>     address a potential place for the compiler to get upset about object size
>     mismatches. Therefore, we need a sockaddr that cleanly provides both an
>     sa_family member and an appropriately fixed-sized sa_data member that does
>     not bloat member usage via the potential alternative of sockaddr_storage
>     to cover both IPv4 and IPv6, to avoid unseemly churn in the affected code
>     bases.
> 
>     Introduce sockaddr_inet as a unified structure for holding both IPv4 and
>     IPv6 addresses (i.e. large enough to accommodate sockaddr_in6).
> 
>     The structure is defined in linux/in6.h since its max size is sized
>     based on sockaddr_in6 and provides a more specific alternative to the
>     generic sockaddr_storage for IPv4 with IPv6 address family handling.
> 
>     The "sa_family" member doesn't use the sa_family_t type to avoid needing
>     layer violating header inclusions.
> 
> Also includes the replacements for wireguard and sctp.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Kees
> 
> Kees Cook (3):
>   ipv6: Add sockaddr_inet unified address structure
>   wireguard: peer: Replace sockaddr with sockaddr_inet
>   sctp: Replace sockaddr with sockaddr_inet in sctp_addr union
> 
>  drivers/net/wireguard/peer.h | 2 +-
>  include/linux/in6.h          | 7 +++++++
>  include/net/sctp/structs.h   | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-23 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-22 17:18 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: Add sockaddr_inet unified address structure Kees Cook
2025-07-22 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] ipv6: " Kees Cook
2025-07-22 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] wireguard: peer: Replace sockaddr with sockaddr_inet Kees Cook
2025-07-22 17:18 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] sctp: Replace sockaddr with sockaddr_inet in sctp_addr union Kees Cook
2025-07-23 15:46 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-07-25 23:26 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: Add sockaddr_inet unified address structure patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250723154647.GI1036606@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).