Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
Cc: richardcochran@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, yangbo.lu@nxp.com, anna-maria@linutronix.de,
	frederic@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+7cfb66a237c4a5fb22ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] ptp: prevent possible ABBA deadlock in ptp_clock_freerun()
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 18:48:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250729154811.a7lg26iuszzoo2sp@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250728062649.469882-1-aha310510@gmail.com> <20250728062649.469882-1-aha310510@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 03:26:49PM +0900, Jeongjun Park wrote:
> syzbot reported the following ABBA deadlock:
> 
>        CPU0                           CPU1
>        ----                           ----
>   n_vclocks_store()
>     lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux) [1]
>         (physical clock)
>                                      pc_clock_adjtime()
>                                        lock(&clk->rwsem) [2]
>                                         (physical clock)
>                                        ...
>                                        ptp_clock_freerun()
>                                          ptp_vclock_in_use()
>                                            lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux) [3]
>                                               (physical clock)
>     ptp_clock_unregister()
>       posix_clock_unregister()
>         lock(&clk->rwsem) [4]
>           (virtual clock)
> 
> Since ptp virtual clock is registered only under ptp physical clock, both
> ptp_clock and posix_clock must be physical clocks for ptp_vclock_in_use()
> to lock &ptp->n_vclocks_mux and check ptp->n_vclocks.
> 
> However, when unregistering vclocks in n_vclocks_store(), the locking
> ptp->n_vclocks_mux is a physical clock lock, but clk->rwsem of
> ptp_clock_unregister() called through device_for_each_child_reverse()
> is a virtual clock lock.
> 
> Therefore, clk->rwsem used in CPU0 and clk->rwsem used in CPU1 are
> different locks, but in lockdep, a false positive occurs because the
> possibility of deadlock is determined through lock-class.
> 
> To solve this, lock subclass annotation must be added to the posix_clock
> rwsem of the vclock.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+7cfb66a237c4a5fb22ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7cfb66a237c4a5fb22ad
> Fixes: 73f37068d540 ("ptp: support ptp physical/virtual clocks conversion")
> Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
> ---
> v4: Remove unnecessary lock class annotation and CC "POSIX CLOCKS and TIMERS" maintainer
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250719124022.1536524-1-aha310510@gmail.com/
> v3: Annotate lock subclass to prevent false positives of lockdep
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250718114958.1473199-1-aha310510@gmail.com/
> v2: Add CC Vladimir
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250705145031.140571-1-aha310510@gmail.com/
> ---

For the general idea:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

>  drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h | 5 +++++
>  drivers/ptp/ptp_vclock.c  | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h b/drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h
> index a6aad743c282..b352df4cd3f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
>  #define PTP_DEFAULT_MAX_VCLOCKS 20
>  #define PTP_MAX_CHANNELS 2048
>  
> +enum {
> +	PTP_LOCK_PHYSICAL = 0,
> +	PTP_LOCK_VIRTUAL,
> +};
> +
>  struct timestamp_event_queue {
>  	struct ptp_extts_event buf[PTP_MAX_TIMESTAMPS];
>  	int head;
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_vclock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_vclock.c
> index 7febfdcbde8b..8ed4b8598924 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_vclock.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_vclock.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,11 @@ static long ptp_vclock_refresh(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp)
>  	return PTP_VCLOCK_REFRESH_INTERVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static void ptp_vclock_set_subclass(struct ptp_clock *ptp)
> +{
> +	lockdep_set_subclass(&ptp->clock.rwsem, PTP_LOCK_VIRTUAL);

Just not sure whether the PTP clock should be exposing this API, or the
POSIX clock, who actually owns the rwsem.

> +}
> +
>  static const struct ptp_clock_info ptp_vclock_info = {
>  	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>  	.name		= "ptp virtual clock",
> @@ -213,6 +218,8 @@ struct ptp_vclock *ptp_vclock_register(struct ptp_clock *pclock)
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> +	ptp_vclock_set_subclass(vclock->clock);
> +
>  	timecounter_init(&vclock->tc, &vclock->cc, 0);
>  	ptp_schedule_worker(vclock->clock, PTP_VCLOCK_REFRESH_INTERVAL);
>  
> --

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-29 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-28  6:26 [PATCH net v4] ptp: prevent possible ABBA deadlock in ptp_clock_freerun() Jeongjun Park
2025-07-28 14:09 ` Richard Cochran
2025-07-29 15:48 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2025-08-05 23:52   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-24  3:23 ` Jeongjun Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250729154811.a7lg26iuszzoo2sp@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=aha310510@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot+7cfb66a237c4a5fb22ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox