From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5C79235364; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754437670; cv=none; b=CNytp4WQ0vngKzKOzCUCJ1YFHorPrMwE9n6blNrJVZuM03JTM1YpempHqOnBjdC1G+gRUKJeDXu2+fWKNhoTbqoORKZPSUskB2UlssHmdqAY9fRbWHm+k572y3niY+3671EY30H7FBEw+FO/slDo1TrXBcJ+AFu6ma1kMUU6FZw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754437670; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T+TQB9L6nkRD5oCLbLR5cryrKU8+F1aWEUgdRNPnQw0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MDSfflcJGje8mikcDjRDeH5f5TmfDqekXK4qKeEy0uGjOK2HpYzuhU62x0MpQ7i0A8ZaBI6pBkiWWsMV6p3Kf3KaN5LgwTHFnjXbgcwQtzr/yQ9nDz4UcQ40D86mHtgE15jYxDBySXzjH68eVazbdsYQuOE8TtQLj5Pq/f8aSBg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Xji4qPCu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Xji4qPCu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8B34C4CEF0; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 23:47:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754437669; bh=T+TQB9L6nkRD5oCLbLR5cryrKU8+F1aWEUgdRNPnQw0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xji4qPCu3qnlfabkVpSBksej6fDAS4kX5md1OfqcrAiLJdQnDqqZsumjw/OXZpxFz RGtoGyJFbL1xwnKB4fTMEk3iPS2cocKvhkQXRoAb5PIzkz2OyEejSgeZg2lG+fhgVC GR/5gkdcPjkEUESPItt0CBA+GkO2uXi/oHK/kpLR8lVvPDtU3BY1LRT8J/M5tgyscN Lt34wXvZJ9zr0gtmdIVye5BtWnmqv6k6Fsv1vtpCUxAkdpYUOBYIhgGtPai6JlIYqp bU3VjiypbFoDw2FgOuX31rb1MehFi+iAjqno/GHnqCKzEUGDQdXWfOOw6k83U5DMwC IYM5zyaXSgNTA== Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 16:47:47 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Linus Torvalds , Ammar Faizi Cc: Simon Horman , Oliver Neukum , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux Netdev Mailing List , Linux USB Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Armando Budianto , gwml@vger.gnuweeb.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, John Ernberg Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: usbnet: Fix the wrong netif_carrier_on() call placement Message-ID: <20250805164747.40e63f6d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250801190310.58443-1-ammarfaizi2@gnuweeb.org> <20250804100050.GQ8494@horms.kernel.org> <20250805202848.GC61519@horms.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 01:40:37 +0300 Linus Torvalds wrote: > So my gut feel is that the > > if (test_and_clear_bit(EVENT_LINK_CARRIER_ON, &dev->flags)) > netif_carrier_on(dev->net); > > should actually be done outside that if-statement entirely, because it > literally ends up changing the thing that if-statement is testing. Right. I think it should be before the if (!netif_carrier_ok(dev->net)) Ammar, could you retest and repost that, since we haven't heard from John?