* [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
@ 2025-07-29 10:41 Byungchul Park
2025-07-29 15:35 ` Mina Almasry
2025-08-10 19:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2025-07-29 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, linux-kernel
Cc: kernel_team, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, almasrymina,
hawk, toke, asml.silence
Changes from RFC:
1. Optimize the implementation of netmem_to_nmdesc to use less
instructions (feedbacked by Pavel)
---8<---
From 6a0dbaecbf9a2425afe73565914eaa762c5d15c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:34:12 +0900
Subject: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
Now that we have struct netmem_desc, it'd better access the pp fields
via struct netmem_desc rather than struct net_iov.
Introduce netmem_to_nmdesc() for safely converting netmem_ref to
netmem_desc regardless of the type underneath e.i. netmem_desc, net_iov.
While at it, remove __netmem_clear_lsb() and make netmem_to_nmdesc()
used instead.
Suggested-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
---
include/net/netmem.h | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
net/core/netmem_priv.h | 16 +++++-----
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netmem.h b/include/net/netmem.h
index f7dacc9e75fd..651e2c62d1dd 100644
--- a/include/net/netmem.h
+++ b/include/net/netmem.h
@@ -247,6 +247,23 @@ static inline unsigned long netmem_pfn_trace(netmem_ref netmem)
return page_to_pfn(netmem_to_page(netmem));
}
+/* XXX: How to extract netmem_desc from page must be changed, once
+ * netmem_desc no longer overlays on page and will be allocated through
+ * slab.
+ */
+#define __pp_page_to_nmdesc(p) (_Generic((p), \
+ const struct page * : (const struct netmem_desc *)(p), \
+ struct page * : (struct netmem_desc *)(p)))
+
+/* CAUTION: Check if the page is a pp page before calling this helper or
+ * know it's a pp page.
+ */
+#define pp_page_to_nmdesc(p) \
+({ \
+ DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_pool_page_is_pp(p)); \
+ __pp_page_to_nmdesc(p); \
+})
+
/**
* __netmem_to_nmdesc - unsafely get pointer to the &netmem_desc backing
* @netmem
@@ -265,42 +282,25 @@ static inline struct netmem_desc *__netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem_ref netmem)
return (__force struct netmem_desc *)netmem;
}
-/* __netmem_clear_lsb - convert netmem_ref to struct net_iov * for access to
- * common fields.
- * @netmem: netmem reference to extract as net_iov.
- *
- * All the sub types of netmem_ref (page, net_iov) have the same pp, pp_magic,
- * dma_addr, and pp_ref_count fields at the same offsets. Thus, we can access
- * these fields without a type check to make sure that the underlying mem is
- * net_iov or page.
+/* netmem_to_nmdesc - convert netmem_ref to struct netmem_desc * for
+ * access to common fields.
+ * @netmem: netmem reference to get netmem_desc.
*
- * The resulting value of this function can only be used to access the fields
- * that are NET_IOV_ASSERT_OFFSET'd. Accessing any other fields will result in
- * undefined behavior.
+ * All the sub types of netmem_ref (netmem_desc, net_iov) have the same
+ * pp, pp_magic, dma_addr, and pp_ref_count fields via netmem_desc.
*
- * Return: the netmem_ref cast to net_iov* regardless of its underlying type.
+ * Return: the pointer to struct netmem_desc * regardless of its
+ * underlying type.
*/
-static inline struct net_iov *__netmem_clear_lsb(netmem_ref netmem)
+static inline struct netmem_desc *netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem_ref netmem)
{
- return (struct net_iov *)((__force unsigned long)netmem & ~NET_IOV);
-}
+ void *p = (void *)((__force unsigned long)netmem & ~NET_IOV);
-/* XXX: How to extract netmem_desc from page must be changed, once
- * netmem_desc no longer overlays on page and will be allocated through
- * slab.
- */
-#define __pp_page_to_nmdesc(p) (_Generic((p), \
- const struct page * : (const struct netmem_desc *)(p), \
- struct page * : (struct netmem_desc *)(p)))
+ if (netmem_is_net_iov(netmem))
+ return &((struct net_iov *)p)->desc;
-/* CAUTION: Check if the page is a pp page before calling this helper or
- * know it's a pp page.
- */
-#define pp_page_to_nmdesc(p) \
-({ \
- DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!page_pool_page_is_pp(p)); \
- __pp_page_to_nmdesc(p); \
-})
+ return __pp_page_to_nmdesc((struct page *)p);
+}
/**
* __netmem_get_pp - unsafely get pointer to the &page_pool backing @netmem
@@ -320,12 +320,12 @@ static inline struct page_pool *__netmem_get_pp(netmem_ref netmem)
static inline struct page_pool *netmem_get_pp(netmem_ref netmem)
{
- return __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp;
+ return netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp;
}
static inline atomic_long_t *netmem_get_pp_ref_count_ref(netmem_ref netmem)
{
- return &__netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp_ref_count;
+ return &netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp_ref_count;
}
static inline bool netmem_is_pref_nid(netmem_ref netmem, int pref_nid)
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static inline bool netmem_is_pfmemalloc(netmem_ref netmem)
static inline unsigned long netmem_get_dma_addr(netmem_ref netmem)
{
- return __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->dma_addr;
+ return netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->dma_addr;
}
void get_netmem(netmem_ref netmem);
diff --git a/net/core/netmem_priv.h b/net/core/netmem_priv.h
index cd95394399b4..23175cb2bd86 100644
--- a/net/core/netmem_priv.h
+++ b/net/core/netmem_priv.h
@@ -5,19 +5,19 @@
static inline unsigned long netmem_get_pp_magic(netmem_ref netmem)
{
- return __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp_magic & ~PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK;
+ return netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp_magic & ~PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK;
}
static inline void netmem_or_pp_magic(netmem_ref netmem, unsigned long pp_magic)
{
- __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp_magic |= pp_magic;
+ netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp_magic |= pp_magic;
}
static inline void netmem_clear_pp_magic(netmem_ref netmem)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(__netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp_magic & PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp_magic & PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK);
- __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp_magic = 0;
+ netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp_magic = 0;
}
static inline bool netmem_is_pp(netmem_ref netmem)
@@ -27,13 +27,13 @@ static inline bool netmem_is_pp(netmem_ref netmem)
static inline void netmem_set_pp(netmem_ref netmem, struct page_pool *pool)
{
- __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp = pool;
+ netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp = pool;
}
static inline void netmem_set_dma_addr(netmem_ref netmem,
unsigned long dma_addr)
{
- __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->dma_addr = dma_addr;
+ netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->dma_addr = dma_addr;
}
static inline unsigned long netmem_get_dma_index(netmem_ref netmem)
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline unsigned long netmem_get_dma_index(netmem_ref netmem)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(netmem_is_net_iov(netmem)))
return 0;
- magic = __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp_magic;
+ magic = netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp_magic;
return (magic & PP_DMA_INDEX_MASK) >> PP_DMA_INDEX_SHIFT;
}
@@ -57,6 +57,6 @@ static inline void netmem_set_dma_index(netmem_ref netmem,
return;
magic = netmem_get_pp_magic(netmem) | (id << PP_DMA_INDEX_SHIFT);
- __netmem_clear_lsb(netmem)->pp_magic = magic;
+ netmem_to_nmdesc(netmem)->pp_magic = magic;
}
#endif
base-commit: fa582ca7e187a15e772e6a72fe035f649b387a60
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
2025-07-29 10:41 [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc() Byungchul Park
@ 2025-07-29 15:35 ` Mina Almasry
2025-08-10 19:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mina Almasry @ 2025-07-29 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Byungchul Park
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, kernel_team, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
horms, hawk, toke, asml.silence
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 3:42 AM Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com> wrote:
>
> Changes from RFC:
> 1. Optimize the implementation of netmem_to_nmdesc to use less
> instructions (feedbacked by Pavel)
>
> ---8<---
> From 6a0dbaecbf9a2425afe73565914eaa762c5d15c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:34:12 +0900
> Subject: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
>
> Now that we have struct netmem_desc, it'd better access the pp fields
> via struct netmem_desc rather than struct net_iov.
>
> Introduce netmem_to_nmdesc() for safely converting netmem_ref to
> netmem_desc regardless of the type underneath e.i. netmem_desc, net_iov.
>
> While at it, remove __netmem_clear_lsb() and make netmem_to_nmdesc()
> used instead.
>
> Suggested-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Thanks for cleaning this up. This bit of tech debt was bothering me!
--
Thanks,
Mina
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
2025-07-29 10:41 [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc() Byungchul Park
2025-07-29 15:35 ` Mina Almasry
@ 2025-08-10 19:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-11 4:23 ` Byungchul Park
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-08-10 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Byungchul Park, netdev, linux-kernel
Cc: kernel_team, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, almasrymina,
hawk, toke
On 7/29/25 11:41, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Changes from RFC:
> 1. Optimize the implementation of netmem_to_nmdesc to use less
> instructions (feedbacked by Pavel)
>
> ---8<---
> From 6a0dbaecbf9a2425afe73565914eaa762c5d15c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:34:12 +0900
> Subject: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
>
> Now that we have struct netmem_desc, it'd better access the pp fields
> via struct netmem_desc rather than struct net_iov.
>
> Introduce netmem_to_nmdesc() for safely converting netmem_ref to
> netmem_desc regardless of the type underneath e.i. netmem_desc, net_iov.
>
> While at it, remove __netmem_clear_lsb() and make netmem_to_nmdesc()
> used instead.
I'll ultimately need this in another tree as indicated in the
original diff, so I'll take it into a branch and send it out
with other patches.
--
Pavel Begunkov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
2025-08-10 19:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
@ 2025-08-11 4:23 ` Byungchul Park
2025-08-11 14:37 ` Pavel Begunkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Byungchul Park @ 2025-08-11 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Begunkov
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, kernel_team, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
horms, almasrymina, hawk, toke
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 08:39:42PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 7/29/25 11:41, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > Changes from RFC:
> > 1. Optimize the implementation of netmem_to_nmdesc to use less
> > instructions (feedbacked by Pavel)
> >
> > ---8<---
> > From 6a0dbaecbf9a2425afe73565914eaa762c5d15c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
> > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:34:12 +0900
> > Subject: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
> >
> > Now that we have struct netmem_desc, it'd better access the pp fields
> > via struct netmem_desc rather than struct net_iov.
> >
> > Introduce netmem_to_nmdesc() for safely converting netmem_ref to
> > netmem_desc regardless of the type underneath e.i. netmem_desc, net_iov.
> >
> > While at it, remove __netmem_clear_lsb() and make netmem_to_nmdesc()
> > used instead.
>
> I'll ultimately need this in another tree as indicated in the
> original diff, so I'll take it into a branch and send it out
Just curious. What is the original diff?
Byungchul
> with other patches.
>
> --
> Pavel Begunkov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
2025-08-11 4:23 ` Byungchul Park
@ 2025-08-11 14:37 ` Pavel Begunkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Begunkov @ 2025-08-11 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Byungchul Park
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, kernel_team, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni,
horms, almasrymina, hawk, toke
On 8/11/25 05:23, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 08:39:42PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 7/29/25 11:41, Byungchul Park wrote:
>>> Changes from RFC:
>>> 1. Optimize the implementation of netmem_to_nmdesc to use less
>>> instructions (feedbacked by Pavel)
>>>
>>> ---8<---
>>> From 6a0dbaecbf9a2425afe73565914eaa762c5d15c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:34:12 +0900
>>> Subject: [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
>>>
>>> Now that we have struct netmem_desc, it'd better access the pp fields
>>> via struct netmem_desc rather than struct net_iov.
>>>
>>> Introduce netmem_to_nmdesc() for safely converting netmem_ref to
>>> netmem_desc regardless of the type underneath e.i. netmem_desc, net_iov.
>>>
>>> While at it, remove __netmem_clear_lsb() and make netmem_to_nmdesc()
>>> used instead.
>>
>> I'll ultimately need this in another tree as indicated in the
>> original diff, so I'll take it into a branch and send it out
>
> Just curious. What is the original diff?
It was this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/a7bd1e6f-b854-4172-a29a-3f0662c6fd6e@gmail.com/
--
Pavel Begunkov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-11 14:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-07-29 10:41 [RFC net-next v2] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc() Byungchul Park
2025-07-29 15:35 ` Mina Almasry
2025-08-10 19:39 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-11 4:23 ` Byungchul Park
2025-08-11 14:37 ` Pavel Begunkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).