From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3E5272E6B; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755543427; cv=none; b=dpHWs/e3j3C1H2Z9Jgp690aO1TPgQpBWyhtv1TNE6Fe7nUKwMjvb0yT1OAS5ZcyZwrOfp0XrJTdRwz+g4BZ5ZmgLIeR0JgglecujsMqKWIQAhvaR8o4JEhy6z4AYDxFK1/db2ahwJrkMc+DaJwnyOMd49MswfztVt87nApT/cXE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755543427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LLrbrlWI1+1Wrpjrc3PeIRE7Z93HYyEAJTPMZ/3akPw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IHN2pe6xhZurUy1C8w7/pa5GDtFh3XIiIjzUQghLmDlb5mW3sJeVi8y1v0Z+Ri9C6WRgpG6Q185PLixPLaaXxAi1V5UqR8fUlR9318RgYThdcR58wIYcWWnV447FCo4BGEEDoyfkzoITQCQwRLssoGMmgNhqBG4HxCVJC7gUJ/w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ayVDIn+8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ayVDIn+8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CB86C4CEEB; Mon, 18 Aug 2025 18:57:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755543427; bh=LLrbrlWI1+1Wrpjrc3PeIRE7Z93HYyEAJTPMZ/3akPw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ayVDIn+8U8Wx4EDu34txQp0k4cUvEI7PP0j0IId9lGTOOiHRy6gfy0+DzeATALLY8 jTSbQbPNF2xefOSoqneA1b0kFBHRCVNapPVfsbVQEzdlrvh7zVFlMA3GvX4CyPwANC klwjkKeEzA+boXeqgbEyzx2Tt3TM3uOUX/DPs5/P0XDlvo4pUMPgdghgDSofFnAKgz UUdxX76YVQgDB2rGVCLIUQFQ4TJ0SUyq+3wiAg1Osm7lcoByulhsoNb7ZnbbwDUfPT BJZ1ueDbYSGUwQZ3nK6YFm3QY/yE9B/0Ir3H7Q2ZmRc16A5/XDoUGAvBWLcVK/S+eO ozRWNrUGUdxEQ== Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:57:05 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Stanimir Varbanov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Broadcom internal kernel review list , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrea della Porta , Nicolas Ferre , Claudiu Beznea , Phil Elwell , Jonathan Bell , Dave Stevenson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add ethernet support for RPi5 Message-ID: <20250818115705.72533d08@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <68c3db9d-daf5-40ed-91a7-1d08b9c8cb52@broadcom.com> References: <20250815135911.1383385-1-svarbanov@suse.de> <4c454b3c-f62c-4086-a665-282aa2f4a0e1@broadcom.com> <20250818115041.71041ad6@kernel.org> <68c3db9d-daf5-40ed-91a7-1d08b9c8cb52@broadcom.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:52:28 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 8/18/25 11:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 11:02:15 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> netdev maintainers, do you mind if I take patches 2, 4 and 5 via the > >> Broadcom ARM SoC tree to avoid generating conflicts down the road? You > >> can take patches 1 and 3. Thanks > > > > 4, 5 make perfect sense, why patch 2? We usually take bindings. > > Because that way when CI runs against the ARM SoC tree, we don't get > errors that the bindings are undocumented. Hm, my understanding is that validation should use bindings from linux-next.. tho I'm not 100% sure. Perhaps DT maintainers can clarify. This problem exists for all DT changes, unless there's something exceptional about the patches I'd rather follow the default process.