From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 197142C859; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755648907; cv=none; b=C3Kr1eRcH/WHpQOHHmDSvy77Ns9ER6xuhJVaUhxOlhXRODYhifO/qeb0x2RxIhclYQ/MutI+zeFSQpqomOsJ3BHPTHJLYaYX4sSNatgIng6zTugn0L0erywXYJuWzD+l1E3TDNUn6DQbUZrYVOzFv0iMFoO5PxptiUCWW9qhxrU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755648907; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kzPn/YJEz3P/5bJQfIbsGMlkw33F/6kXcp2B3/hVnxg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XFkr2EeksjbbIXpn2CauwP1BMAVj/O9pkuRjGHHvJOTI6Ua3jrZ7kZ/HQWf1b34NUAXW2xMSVDPFLH5uCHNzJ8ip8rRzCuCwoZ3OZIJu//3Rci/N5aUDUWO2ZRCaVjvFePtvQkY/epFxos7EHQD1HmBj2tmJwNHk7vP2uI2hZZg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FZt4sIJY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FZt4sIJY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2721CC4CEF1; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:15:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755648906; bh=kzPn/YJEz3P/5bJQfIbsGMlkw33F/6kXcp2B3/hVnxg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FZt4sIJYj+5SDWKOoTklabwUDzLP1zxuCPLwdqAItQIVr9vTqB7nG4lHsUK2kYQD5 podavnBbhOdpiGcL6iTpICCB4OmKH7fKR/OZuvogq6KLE4CpWKzo9r5R2VVh/3CHCx d9JSnjY8Xu6KSDaItD3iqyDxRPo1juL+PqhRCLP9sgGNEMoFpDzTK6BQhJ+Vz2i3Vn Dd8xWHOVr5zRmV9ZLcHifGrtmf613TqDCjpc5XKDYaew6jNjWJAv2nu/c9Uh6v2MGe 9zGRT/jNgTsCc7BzdHjU5PXX1Y5rjs1z6vyP5gnfIKcTP5Qj5RIPxWJvN9ISI+NSSw rXn3KDoDpsqkw== Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 17:15:05 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Dragos Tatulea Cc: cpaasch@openai.com, Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , Tariq Toukan , Mark Bloch , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Alexander Lobakin , Gal Pressman , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net/mlx5: Avoid copying payload to the skb's linear part Message-ID: <20250819171505.4ebbac36@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <6dguqontvbisoypbfxw5xyscyqhvskk5avf7gwqgwajc4ic75a@id3pume2f4hw> References: <20250816-cpaasch-pf-927-netmlx5-avoid-copying-the-payload-to-the-malloced-area-v2-0-b11b30bc2d10@openai.com> <20250816-cpaasch-pf-927-netmlx5-avoid-copying-the-payload-to-the-malloced-area-v2-2-b11b30bc2d10@openai.com> <6dguqontvbisoypbfxw5xyscyqhvskk5avf7gwqgwajc4ic75a@id3pume2f4hw> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 09:58:54 +0000 Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > @@ -2009,10 +2040,14 @@ mlx5e_skb_from_cqe_mpwrq_nonlinear(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, struct mlx5e_mpw_info *w > > u32 linear_frame_sz; > > u16 linear_data_len; > > u16 linear_hr; > > + u16 headlen; > > void *va; > > > > prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog); > > > > + headlen = min3(mlx5e_cqe_estimate_hdr_len(cqe), cqe_bcnt, > > + (u16)MLX5E_RX_MAX_HEAD); > > + > How about keeping the old calculation for XDP and do this one for > non-xdp in the following if/else block? > > This way XDP perf will not be impacted by the extra call to > mlx5e_cqe_estimate_hdr_len(). Perhaps move it further down for XDP? Ideally attaching a program which returns XDP_PASS shouldn't impact normal TCP perf.