From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FFF426D4E2; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755705414; cv=none; b=IMsF3UPAIfnAVQbXVLq9pz5yx6+JLVIeaDOQBiRpK24iMzJd51AMz7y9o4tm80xsRs/j0VNHQ6JHNW4hcISPdKd9cdczdTFPdGgwHJORFZVwj7WaAIM6aFMrrTjw7onmhqoB9sGvYcpYZxgr9TwD5lpECewSjQwq9jmU+ltUGSc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755705414; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iJ6BWRhcfdGTj+t/9+L3Zt0RuVafSEkJxteervNs1lI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=um58msI+jonIWXaNSwtpB5JfW3N+DT2/KWTSgqoqM9U7PRhrLpeZt4TeXQB3xknEpfIBZwYiczZrw6+/21Dzq/pOoaJavwGtVQmRttra5sXAMHKO/pmDXhS1Alf/7xHXW/iXPNQ8Xu6t9rEMbaSLsqkW9lOwl4uLUq+8lVXFyVM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hGxGlvX3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hGxGlvX3" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53BD2C4CEE7; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:56:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755705413; bh=iJ6BWRhcfdGTj+t/9+L3Zt0RuVafSEkJxteervNs1lI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hGxGlvX3nlwc3ojc89fPW2vtB4s4kIpy3ua357hA3xZiE5QSH3XQnpl0F5Bmsvx2V 7jAzijmUcR6aR9J7Rv3NVdhqjvYMwQ27ZAgcOz7xAwiMG2Ypc+Hqjqgv63/d7n/99T nKFgggQFP8Hsz0zCb959kTzz1rBTeCT9JWIFFhDQ/LnkiiYDFA498uO+FItjZLMmQS Lo2SNiiReT0SAIau74q2hD+z8mRItbkp6JXalvNA3vvmcM017W2mSp5OLk96/ahaWF iEK2UvaST9JX8WxMstmzd4BYcyLC1+Wnct1RX/x/EgSuu5ZcwjZGm7LFuy/8V33wn9 c4aq2sUOaJ2LQ== Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:56:52 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "G Thomas, Rohan" Cc: Rohan G Thomas via B4 Relay , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Serge Semin , Romain Gantois , Jose Abreu , Ong Boon Leong , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Gerlach Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: stmmac: Set CIC bit only for TX queues with COE Message-ID: <20250820085652.5e4aa8cf@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250820085446.61c50069@kernel.org> References: <20250816-xgmac-minor-fixes-v2-0-699552cf8a7f@altera.com> <20250816-xgmac-minor-fixes-v2-3-699552cf8a7f@altera.com> <20250819182207.5d7b2faa@kernel.org> <22947f6b-03f3-4ee5-974b-aa4912ea37a3@altera.com> <20250820085446.61c50069@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:54:46 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 12:44:18 +0530 G Thomas, Rohan wrote: > > On 8/20/2025 6:52 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > Hopefully the slight pointer chasing here doesn't impact performance? > > > XDP itself doesn't support checksum so perhaps we could always pass > > > false? > > > > I'm not certain whether some XDP applications might be benefiting from > > checksum offloading currently > > Checksum offload is not supported in real XDP, AFAIK, and in AF_XDP > the driver must implement a checksum callback which stmmac does not do. > IOW it's not possible to use Tx checksum offload in stmmac today from > XDP. To be clear -- this is just for context. I don't understand the details of what the CIC bit controls, so the final decision is up to you.