From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46A42EDD71; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755786766; cv=none; b=A+fLgp1trCNQW2sHdYhX3UpC3ouy7uZRvDfvhthUyYu1KnanwrC2O1PNVI4LVftxA0KjRVN2t6ZuMk2AqCSdfbQ7704Xrl+tbBoXna2XQxBt9maX10J7eEXpIijCb1zuf/lM8W+8n1nzAcrX0d0U0cdTisCENO6tgYfMEJeEfGQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755786766; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Xo1a4XU2LFDPYD8x3IfXLvba6QZUZ4f1jrg2g57aUCo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qlex9WoAB/Oi1jv1OzbBx6e+gWruSqKtkPQICuKvnK4ao/jKZK25eeM5SackPN24Bzg8/GIyKbT4a2ns1F9tWDfJTbk3gWISlfBic7syjzh5kDB6chsPs0NudduH0uMqWLi52Rnw1vd74cme8Oh1jNiCJIXJDFJawIIW0LfSZJw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=J4DNNvaY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="J4DNNvaY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0366C4CEEB; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:32:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755786766; bh=Xo1a4XU2LFDPYD8x3IfXLvba6QZUZ4f1jrg2g57aUCo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J4DNNvaYXcGM4p5MFinmZw1HXEDXxECTc3qZSERFN5F33hlxCxuUWl+h9JMex9s4W lstk2E/hdj0HIORoRmW71FDC9XUdkT64dT+qvuSKZvjEcpNkIrdmXH5QA7GpT0famn +1n2jYD8DJ92xhAYxDc+7pkqTPD6Cx3WMJc7XNwXS0U5RjS4X1A2YoKbR+b6lsZm5Z AZ0xLmxd4jssAIDytA5cmhWn/M/wSYVM346M4n49vzetA4wGt//HbJKwf13ysVF7k3 a9rZcLwk/WJ99Axjaronu/A9b6XIxU5MPVS+MuikOQ6SKdy7H1jCU0EQanVnbydbAk kqIx1Jgw+TvVA== Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 07:32:44 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Dragos Tatulea Cc: almasrymina@google.com, asml.silence@gmail.com, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , cratiu@nvidia.com, parav@nvidia.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sdf@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 7/7] net: devmem: allow binding on rx queues with same DMA devices Message-ID: <20250821073244.2b1bd1f6@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <73yte2bgpw4e6vdycrbgiyhujtl4z6h33e743vvo2rg3bioajb@u3ebcsmuench> References: <20250820171214.3597901-1-dtatulea@nvidia.com> <20250820171214.3597901-9-dtatulea@nvidia.com> <20250820181609.616976d2@kernel.org> <73yte2bgpw4e6vdycrbgiyhujtl4z6h33e743vvo2rg3bioajb@u3ebcsmuench> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:10:57 +0000 Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > I think we may want to bubble up the Multi-PF thing from the comment to > > the user. This could be quite confusing to people. How about: > > > > "DMA device mismatch between queue %u and %u (multi-PF device?)" > Sounds good. Do we still need the comment? A similar remark is done in > the commit message as well. I think the comment can go away with the better user-facing message. The commit msg LGTM as is, doesn't count as extra LoC..