From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE74F78F58; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756124438; cv=none; b=YCe4izSKQRlTIrLjo2A0hq+iVt/h+vcJYwTZMajkmkNTecliHtRG51wjGDgoLMEcTh+IuMcJyBcLvfp7KkXxH7RRoOgO+d+RMxiiKYzH8vDW5XKnegXQJuSP6oClWz/WGQjDK8vgtbXWuHMoRW99k1Q3Hih3nap8Y9VefuJrbk8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756124438; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h7hrNFYhLwn9BT1C/3Vpaem6D+z7W+zRXwonq3Svi9s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Fz7jZMCu5eFsxCx3cxM01guIBqbm0e0cbylCvaE8D9k0x54+CEJzxLgjEMJOBqVXBCcerlbFZTazlKd/nn0NsarCigtrsXF6kDt4zCx+1U49h1HvE95yz2LI1WLsARQGvmWCRJF7GwQk1zvvzKy35i5O1JC011W+ErfbkSGzw3Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=eAM+B1GY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="eAM+B1GY" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C394E40772; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65F38605F1; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 61EC91C22D928; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:20:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1756124427; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=h7hrNFYhLwn9BT1C/3Vpaem6D+z7W+zRXwonq3Svi9s=; b=eAM+B1GYYZEgno+6Km3RDSdQ1mPQVco5var0IJcR6N5q2PC9VPYVsGwvI+AEXQCN7HrLqh oHY6bWAi6c/ahoHPYaXSyFrrILw4MZcChzUbrH7ECUllP17Xt5Rt/LP0a1U/JJUe6d8Ow0 lNhpO9AeKbE9nspnIVNbCEShiNvIbsJcJ6JlY5V6K/nD0pKgZKTU4v+2+rXSNqQA7fPTzD 0Ds+DldTArlmq7XVJM5WLvvhrpuwgbxxwHkXdUeYZV2aPV1GRySxtc5h+uSewbK/hLOH26 8ToRnqUz6lx3uzVCNdPX9MeZ6EeZemCqmIHxr+h920oQXy0Iso2vNmKo9z+X2w== Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:20:01 +0200 From: Kory Maincent To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Andrew Lunn , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , kernel@pengutronix.de, Dent Project , Thomas Petazzoni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Maxime Chevallier , Kyle Swenson Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: Add sysfs interface for configuration save/reset Message-ID: <20250825142001.19b796ae@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> In-Reply-To: References: <20250822-feature_poe_permanent_conf-v1-0-dcd41290254d@bootlin.com> <20250822-feature_poe_permanent_conf-v1-2-dcd41290254d@bootlin.com> <20250825104721.28f127a2@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> Organization: bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Hello Oleksij, Le Mon, 25 Aug 2025 11:14:03 +0200, Oleksij Rempel a =C3=A9crit : > Hello Kory, >=20 > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 10:47:21AM +0200, Kory Maincent wrote: > > > I've not looked at the sysfs documentation. Are there other examples > > > of such a property? =20 > >=20 > > Not sure for that particular save/reset configuration case. > > Have you another implementation idea in mind? =20 >=20 > My personal preference would be to use devlink (netlink based) > interface. We will have more controller/domain specific functions which c= an't > be represented per port. Ok, I never played with devlink but I will check.=20 > PS: if you are on the OSS Amsterdam, we can talk in person about it. Yes sure. Let's meet at the social event around a beer! Regards, --=20 K=C3=B6ry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com