From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: devmem: rename tx_vec to vec in dmabuf binding
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:36:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250902-scratch-bobbyeshleman-devmem-tcp-token-upstream-v1-1-d946169b5550@meta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902-scratch-bobbyeshleman-devmem-tcp-token-upstream-v1-0-d946169b5550@meta.com>
From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
Rename the 'tx_vec' field in struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding to 'vec'.
This field holds pointers to net_iov structures. The rename prepares for
reusing 'vec' for both TX and RX directions.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
---
net/core/devmem.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
net/core/devmem.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
index d9de31a6cc7f..b4c570d4f37a 100644
--- a/net/core/devmem.c
+++ b/net/core/devmem.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ void __net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_free(struct work_struct *wq)
dma_buf_detach(binding->dmabuf, binding->attachment);
dma_buf_put(binding->dmabuf);
xa_destroy(&binding->bound_rxqs);
- kvfree(binding->tx_vec);
+ kvfree(binding->vec);
kfree(binding);
}
@@ -231,10 +231,10 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev,
}
if (direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
- binding->tx_vec = kvmalloc_array(dmabuf->size / PAGE_SIZE,
- sizeof(struct net_iov *),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!binding->tx_vec) {
+ binding->vec = kvmalloc_array(dmabuf->size / PAGE_SIZE,
+ sizeof(struct net_iov *),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!binding->vec) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_unmap;
}
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev,
dev_to_node(&dev->dev));
if (!binding->chunk_pool) {
err = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_tx_vec;
+ goto err_vec;
}
virtual = 0;
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev,
page_pool_set_dma_addr_netmem(net_iov_to_netmem(niov),
net_devmem_get_dma_addr(niov));
if (direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE)
- binding->tx_vec[owner->area.base_virtual / PAGE_SIZE + i] = niov;
+ binding->vec[owner->area.base_virtual / PAGE_SIZE + i] = niov;
}
virtual += len;
@@ -314,8 +314,8 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev,
gen_pool_for_each_chunk(binding->chunk_pool,
net_devmem_dmabuf_free_chunk_owner, NULL);
gen_pool_destroy(binding->chunk_pool);
-err_tx_vec:
- kvfree(binding->tx_vec);
+err_vec:
+ kvfree(binding->vec);
err_unmap:
dma_buf_unmap_attachment_unlocked(binding->attachment, binding->sgt,
direction);
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_get_binding(struct sock *sk,
int err = 0;
binding = net_devmem_lookup_dmabuf(dmabuf_id);
- if (!binding || !binding->tx_vec) {
+ if (!binding || !binding->vec) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_err;
}
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ net_devmem_get_niov_at(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding,
*off = virt_addr % PAGE_SIZE;
*size = PAGE_SIZE - *off;
- return binding->tx_vec[virt_addr / PAGE_SIZE];
+ return binding->vec[virt_addr / PAGE_SIZE];
}
/*** "Dmabuf devmem memory provider" ***/
diff --git a/net/core/devmem.h b/net/core/devmem.h
index 101150d761af..2ada54fb63d7 100644
--- a/net/core/devmem.h
+++ b/net/core/devmem.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding {
* address. This array is convenient to map the virtual addresses to
* net_iovs in the TX path.
*/
- struct net_iov **tx_vec;
+ struct net_iov **vec;
struct work_struct unbind_w;
};
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 21:36 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: devmem: improve cpu cost of RX token management Bobby Eshleman
2025-09-02 21:36 ` Bobby Eshleman [this message]
2025-09-02 21:36 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: devmem: use niov array for " Bobby Eshleman
2025-09-03 10:50 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-03 20:20 ` Mina Almasry
2025-09-04 0:15 ` Bobby Eshleman
2025-09-03 17:46 ` [syzbot ci] Re: net: devmem: improve cpu cost of RX " syzbot ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250902-scratch-bobbyeshleman-devmem-tcp-token-upstream-v1-1-d946169b5550@meta.com \
--to=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).