netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] smsc911x: add second read of EEPROM mac when possible corruption seen
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 12:05:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250902120528.5adc9fb7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLbjkQF8mA5HGDfx@colin-ia-desktop>

On Tue, 2 Sep 2025 07:31:13 -0500 Colin Foster wrote:
> > > +	 * The first mac_read always returns 0. Re-read it to get the
> > > +	 * full MAC  
> > 
> > Always? Strange, why did nobody notice until now?  
> 
> For me it is 100% reproduceable. The first read is always 0. I've added
> delays in case timing was the issue. I've swapped ADDRH and ADDRL and
> the opposite effect happened (where the first four MAC octets were
> zero). Re-reads always succeed.
> 
> Without the patch, the last two MAC octets are always zero.
> 
> We didn't notice it until we started hooking multiple devices on the
> same network.
> 
> If there is anyone else running this hardware, I'd love verification.
> Its an SMSC9221.
> 
> That's a long way of saying "I don't know" unfortunately.

Right, I think we should avoid saying "always" in the comment then.
Let's weasel word it a little bit given the uncertainty..

      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-02 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-28 21:44 [PATCH v1] smsc911x: add second read of EEPROM mac when possible corruption seen Colin Foster
2025-09-01 20:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-02 12:31   ` Colin Foster
2025-09-02 19:05     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250902120528.5adc9fb7@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=colin.foster@in-advantage.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=steve.glendinning@shawell.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).