From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 1/2] net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl->phydev writes with resolver
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 22:01:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250903190145.n7su27upz2avqcm5@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903184858.GF361157@horms.kernel.org>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 07:48:58PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 06:23:47PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > @@ -1582,8 +1584,11 @@ static void phylink_resolve(struct work_struct *w)
> > struct phylink_link_state link_state;
> > bool mac_config = false;
> > bool retrigger = false;
> > + struct phy_device *phy;
> > bool cur_link_state;
> >
> > + mutex_lock(&pl->phy_lock);
> > + phy = pl->phydev;
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> I guess this is an artifact of the development of this patchset.
> Whatever the case, phy is set but otherwise unused in this function.
>
> This makes CI lightup like a Christmas tree.
> And it's a bit too early in the year for that.
Thanks for letting me know. It's an artifact of moving patch 1 in front
of 2, and I'll address this for the next revision.
I downgraded to a slower computer for kernel compilation, and even
though I did compile patch by patch this submission, I had to stop
building with W=1 C=1 for some unrelated bisect and I forgot to turn
them back on.
I don't have a great solution to this, except I'll try next time to set
up a separate 'git worktree' for noisy stuff like bisection, and try to
keep the net-next environment separate and always with build warnings
and debug options enabled.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-03 15:23 [PATCH v2 net 1/2] net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl->phydev writes with resolver Vladimir Oltean
2025-09-03 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 net 2/2] net: phy: transfer phy_config_inband() locking responsibility to phylink Vladimir Oltean
2025-09-03 15:26 ` [PATCH v2 net 1/2] net: phylink: add lock for serializing concurrent pl->phydev writes with resolver Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-03 15:31 ` Vladimir Oltean
2025-09-03 15:52 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-03 17:04 ` Vladimir Oltean
2025-09-03 18:48 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-03 19:01 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2025-09-04 8:42 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250903190145.n7su27upz2avqcm5@skbuf \
--to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox