netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	 Jamie Bainbridge <jamie.bainbridge@gmail.com>,
	Abhishek Rawal <rawal.abhishek92@gmail.com>,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/9] ipv6: snmp: do not use SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL anymore
Date: Fri,  5 Sep 2025 16:58:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250905165813.1470708-3-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905165813.1470708-1-edumazet@google.com>

Use ARRAY_SIZE(), so that we know the limit at compile time.

Following patch needs this preliminary change.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 include/net/ip.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/ipv6/proc.c  | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/ip.h b/include/net/ip.h
index 6dbd2bf8fa9c..a1624e8db1ab 100644
--- a/include/net/ip.h
+++ b/include/net/ip.h
@@ -338,6 +338,19 @@ static inline u64 snmp_fold_field64(void __percpu *mib, int offt, size_t syncp_o
 	} \
 }
 
+#define snmp_get_cpu_field64_batch_cnt(buff64, stats_list, cnt,	\
+				       mib_statistic, offset)	\
+{ \
+	int i, c; \
+	for_each_possible_cpu(c) { \
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) \
+			buff64[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field64( \
+					mib_statistic, \
+					c, stats_list[i].entry, \
+					offset); \
+	} \
+}
+
 #define snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, stats_list, mib_statistic) \
 { \
 	int i, c; \
@@ -349,6 +362,17 @@ static inline u64 snmp_fold_field64(void __percpu *mib, int offt, size_t syncp_o
 	} \
 }
 
+#define snmp_get_cpu_field_batch_cnt(buff, stats_list, cnt, mib_statistic) \
+{ \
+	int i, c; \
+	for_each_possible_cpu(c) { \
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) \
+			buff[i] += snmp_get_cpu_field( \
+						mib_statistic, \
+						c, stats_list[i].entry); \
+	} \
+}
+
 static inline void inet_get_local_port_range(const struct net *net, int *low, int *high)
 {
 	u32 range = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.ip_local_ports.range);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/proc.c b/net/ipv6/proc.c
index e96f14a36834..92ed04729c2f 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/proc.c
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_ipstats_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Ip6InECT0Pkts", IPSTATS_MIB_ECT0PKTS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Ip6InCEPkts", IPSTATS_MIB_CEPKTS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Ip6OutTransmits", IPSTATS_MIB_OUTPKTS),
-	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
 static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_icmp6_list[] = {
@@ -96,7 +95,6 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_icmp6_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6OutErrors", ICMP6_MIB_OUTERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6InCsumErrors", ICMP6_MIB_CSUMERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Icmp6OutRateLimitHost", ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST),
-	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
 static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_udp6_list[] = {
@@ -109,7 +107,6 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_udp6_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Udp6InCsumErrors", UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Udp6IgnoredMulti", UDP_MIB_IGNOREDMULTI),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("Udp6MemErrors", UDP_MIB_MEMERRORS),
-	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
 static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_udplite6_list[] = {
@@ -121,7 +118,6 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp6_udplite6_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("UdpLite6SndbufErrors", UDP_MIB_SNDBUFERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("UdpLite6InCsumErrors", UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("UdpLite6MemErrors", UDP_MIB_MEMERRORS),
-	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
 static void snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(struct seq_file *seq, atomic_long_t *smib)
@@ -182,35 +178,37 @@ static void snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(struct seq_file *seq, atomic_long_t *smib)
  */
 static void snmp6_seq_show_item(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *pcpumib,
 				atomic_long_t *smib,
-				const struct snmp_mib *itemlist)
+				const struct snmp_mib *itemlist,
+				int cnt)
 {
 	unsigned long buff[SNMP_MIB_MAX];
 	int i;
 
 	if (pcpumib) {
-		memset(buff, 0, sizeof(unsigned long) * SNMP_MIB_MAX);
+		memset(buff, 0, sizeof(unsigned long) * cnt);
 
-		snmp_get_cpu_field_batch(buff, itemlist, pcpumib);
-		for (i = 0; itemlist[i].name; i++)
+		snmp_get_cpu_field_batch_cnt(buff, itemlist, cnt, pcpumib);
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
 			seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%lu\n",
 				   itemlist[i].name, buff[i]);
 	} else {
-		for (i = 0; itemlist[i].name; i++)
+		for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
 			seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%lu\n", itemlist[i].name,
 				   atomic_long_read(smib + itemlist[i].entry));
 	}
 }
 
 static void snmp6_seq_show_item64(struct seq_file *seq, void __percpu *mib,
-				  const struct snmp_mib *itemlist, size_t syncpoff)
+				  const struct snmp_mib *itemlist,
+				  int cnt, size_t syncpoff)
 {
 	u64 buff64[SNMP_MIB_MAX];
 	int i;
 
-	memset(buff64, 0, sizeof(u64) * SNMP_MIB_MAX);
+	memset(buff64, 0, sizeof(u64) * cnt);
 
-	snmp_get_cpu_field64_batch(buff64, itemlist, mib, syncpoff);
-	for (i = 0; itemlist[i].name; i++)
+	snmp_get_cpu_field64_batch_cnt(buff64, itemlist, cnt, mib, syncpoff);
+	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
 		seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%llu\n", itemlist[i].name, buff64[i]);
 }
 
@@ -219,14 +217,19 @@ static int snmp6_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	struct net *net = (struct net *)seq->private;
 
 	snmp6_seq_show_item64(seq, net->mib.ipv6_statistics,
-			    snmp6_ipstats_list, offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
+			      snmp6_ipstats_list,
+			      ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_ipstats_list),
+			      offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
 	snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, net->mib.icmpv6_statistics,
-			    NULL, snmp6_icmp6_list);
+			    NULL, snmp6_icmp6_list,
+			    ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_icmp6_list));
 	snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(seq, net->mib.icmpv6msg_statistics->mibs);
 	snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, net->mib.udp_stats_in6,
-			    NULL, snmp6_udp6_list);
+			    NULL, snmp6_udp6_list,
+			    ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_udp6_list));
 	snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, net->mib.udplite_stats_in6,
-			    NULL, snmp6_udplite6_list);
+			    NULL, snmp6_udplite6_list,
+			    ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_udplite6_list));
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -236,9 +239,11 @@ static int snmp6_dev_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 
 	seq_printf(seq, "%-32s\t%u\n", "ifIndex", idev->dev->ifindex);
 	snmp6_seq_show_item64(seq, idev->stats.ipv6,
-			    snmp6_ipstats_list, offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
+			      snmp6_ipstats_list,
+			      ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_ipstats_list),
+			      offsetof(struct ipstats_mib, syncp));
 	snmp6_seq_show_item(seq, NULL, idev->stats.icmpv6dev->mibs,
-			    snmp6_icmp6_list);
+			    snmp6_icmp6_list, ARRAY_SIZE(snmp6_icmp6_list));
 	snmp6_seq_show_icmpv6msg(seq, idev->stats.icmpv6msgdev->mibs);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.51.0.355.g5224444f11-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-05 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05 16:58 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] ipv6: snmp: avoid performance issue with RATELIMITHOST Eric Dumazet
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] ipv6: snmp: remove icmp6type2name[] Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:49   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2025-09-08 13:49   ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/9] ipv6: snmp: do not use SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL anymore Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/9] ipv6: snmp: do not track per idev ICMP6_MIB_RATELIMITHOST Eric Dumazet
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/9] ipv4: snmp: do not use SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL anymore Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:54   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/9] mptcp: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-06 12:59   ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] sctp: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:56   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-08 15:29   ` Xin Long
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 7/9] tls: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 13:58   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 8/9] xfrm: " Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 14:12   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-05 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 9/9] net: snmp: remove SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL Eric Dumazet
2025-09-08 14:18   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2025-09-09  1:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] ipv6: snmp: avoid performance issue with RATELIMITHOST patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250905165813.1470708-3-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jamie.bainbridge@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rawal.abhishek92@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).