From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFCE2D7DC8; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 20:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757362843; cv=none; b=XHtIRqRzX9nsWi1WVzzKx5yhZeV2ru0VGO2bmQsXrQCfG0AEY9wmLVoLztMbtCMPkyYQ1HYFoc8b/10yIEr8tTWlpCbjNyzvssaS1d1JLDMBRFro/oWHjEoRcqTSh5pqvRIX+/xbyHyog7oUx4O75nA76HduGX0Az3j01P46mCA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757362843; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3JfEPiTReYJNL9FI/IDG+noi5J0PIaT1KrGz03xK3mo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nIGaNtkwuIEKLAwz4rF814xJg9cVtWLt+ufuxkUiG5K/0hyf8zWv0bwQzp5eAND96fZN0LcIPDtmRUpENtn1CVMm9Qp3251EX7Q/URxeAwMjIo31Z+lnYRiDaKsOYjCUGs6euz1Zm//eDrUU86xzLdx1kLaImG5/kbYseRPtFRw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Ay5sfv/K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ay5sfv/K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B2AFC4CEF1; Mon, 8 Sep 2025 20:20:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757362843; bh=3JfEPiTReYJNL9FI/IDG+noi5J0PIaT1KrGz03xK3mo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ay5sfv/Kpify9UWg3iCN726VZ404UXGzDc50Pe8T7mEaGWy24shClkXsuLuq2ausj TcswAuShJlXjISqzpsjgKproS0B+/i9G1xwFA+sGICaAuKNozKSz5303IQVyWY6A58 7xWz6myJojXQG8yWArT90SbfzIJKtxRnzSZQCtqavYte/I8bOPN+qL1mSdvtVhCUqt /L+bzW9RWU8DRj/GYMADqHHXhy+HqP08rAvn3OyQAbh7VcmuXRKlzBbSXn/hqWudNd hq9UumDtQvoV5s4MeAWSYp/iArJLy6NafisxfPoIqDhVTXzs2YmI0aaEvWV8J9baC1 w79qfuXdrzWuQ== Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:20:41 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Mina Almasry Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, nathan@kernel.org, nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com, morbo@google.com, justinstitt@google.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] page_pool: always add GFP_NOWARN for ATOMIC allocations Message-ID: <20250908132041.5ae74626@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250908152123.97829-1-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:15:07 -0700 Mina Almasry wrote: > > + /* Unconditionally set NOWARN if allocating from the datapath. > > + * Use a single bit from the ATOMIC mask to help compiler optimize. > > + */ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(!(GFP_ATOMIC & __GFP_HIGH)); > > + if (gfp & __GFP_HIGH) > > + gfp |= __GFP_NOWARN; > > + > > I wonder if pp allocs are ever used for anything other than datapath > pages (and if not, we can add __GPF_NOWARN here unconditionally. But > this is good too I think. datapath == in NAPI context, here. We still want the warning if the allocations fail with GFP_KERNEL, e.g. during ndo_open.