From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26BC910F2; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757462605; cv=none; b=nmnfME0rzDnRWmrtJEV8zd4C7YJl1O4ENOqPW5luOEir1tayanRxEjVwA/0LN2/NzWVFK1otbzip7tQPmCTA6sWAk9aqj+MC9jzuuAnOC/UV7oJ7sGof6CAoATTw8FoiNqVPiTa9ev6b8rNthDBAfDSvqevHpjrj2qBxa0nVe6I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757462605; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GwntTzkwKFk0XVbU9OiZglFwS+VRzCQQ+Oc2UE4ksQk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tdWebEkOOCGGwhOWcYIxCyohTUxdoYE2HlDW0tuYtguAd1rWMWCSIueIeF1l46ObpUnKjx2B3eW3VHg5WGGnCL2sE67ADtrdPBZCK+2LJ6CnYSyM1nZB54BcJ5a59DJ8OeZqNvxynLTMiALYt4/8+jYVnq13ixNwVwuROaLTDak= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MlRqfTHH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MlRqfTHH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38536C4CEF7; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:03:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757462604; bh=GwntTzkwKFk0XVbU9OiZglFwS+VRzCQQ+Oc2UE4ksQk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MlRqfTHH/HUqsRZAyCyEBOdxepdRZ8F8GfsKfrfytw2zttbPOBN5gSM8WmbecrqRY 29yIQP8aeh48qTyUfluDBC/d9KOjWG4wgEoPCelWMC0zAh6IBJTkS89lSnkxOpag7a fAQHZKBAIj293O5X+hx3FQrB48UJ6WOP8si8hqFLOqPTT3ug24OMbsA4M/zCElvWxG M93fuA7oIdRjhvSFXUOiZNJwzJWOxBe5Oe6GgHXrfqSdmHAHVLPjSNTfS50xje3y3W ndQIIYxEDUSkmAJSTpZmY/d0b8elE7xWpQ45JfTyxWxubPdjwxY41h67OujItm8pzF Iv74k22+X2MCQ== Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 17:03:23 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Ahern Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] selftests: net: replace sleeps in fcnal-test with waits Message-ID: <20250909170323.5b0dbcc0@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <263f7204-6f5b-4bbc-8c05-222cdb04fb15@kernel.org> References: <20250908200949.270433-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20250909153346.4fa8c369@kernel.org> <263f7204-6f5b-4bbc-8c05-222cdb04fb15@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 16:59:28 -0600 David Ahern wrote: > > This makes some ping tests fail. > > > > https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/289602/129-fcnal-other-sh/stdout > > https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/289602/128-fcnal-ipv6-sh/stdout > > > > I only tested with debug kernels, but the non-debug get upset. > > I'll resend just the wait_local_port_listen changes. If the change > > gets more complex it's probably good to separate them out in the first > > place. > > That is surprising to me. I will take look tomorrow. Thanks! FWIW I repro'd one with "pause on fail" enabled and trying to ping manually also wasn't working. Something odd.