From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AEDE13C3CD; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757551521; cv=none; b=k7LUvo6gxjFCOUatuJ3NBfkQac6ACqCYdniBH93wjNDtYY0/Wd9EAJ4mUOyKRnNTCX/G3b+uIb988yYx4MhK6mGevwEsTOINDpbz2ITsz988+YKQWPMpoFACvNEdwNXbVcyXHQvXkVSbtuJOV5toy9kAgY5T8wYFuVvaCpaLfZs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757551521; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v2ZqrhlSm1W415qGFUPkcy8KzMkQn2UIUPfngwncT6k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ug7IaFvVd+LT4hMGIEMRkr5FAeDhmuspgM0WcVg/HdodAtvzAM3CNcDCmZBmEgzjIaQsBgXqthbhq2Nqz97Mur2MHWfmX98la1O0/8LaJ3F6rOcmR3hW9ToeC54nIv3SXYN8calNcIASIZmzYbX0prRK+F6xbJl7QsuLwwFr2rY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jHJSdwWQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jHJSdwWQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2D3DC4CEEB; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:45:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757551521; bh=v2ZqrhlSm1W415qGFUPkcy8KzMkQn2UIUPfngwncT6k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jHJSdwWQ0DLdbZALIMHXFC+9CL7Ab58DlmvFyuAO4L/AL9OZaa9K8rJaf7+x3jc7I PqnZ1xoxFTvuXSWHRzdPDziWJhbYMKa79UX8y8xQysdhO4+kGrEaygvNImVEBbv4ZB BmpUs9ZtqLGTrTZQfV39MYcIXQJMUyGjMzx3oVvoIlR8Mj46NJa7TuZMIDR3zP++kV tDsl7Ppk8TnVndFjUKO5TqT31q+Z8qi+0gxIcVGfBx/M7+onL63IVfDay8IVELttSN o8FHWZj9BSt22VEB+5eFnZxRpsgCvsFFTgtBM4aAMAVIkQrGPvFPcDscEJhCNBLfv/ NHQdLTa21C0ww== Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 17:45:19 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jianbo Liu Cc: Tariq Toukan , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , "Mark Bloch" , , , , Gal Pressman Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] net/mlx5e: Harden uplink netdev access against device unbind Message-ID: <20250910174519.2ec85ac2@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1757326026-536849-1-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com> <1757326026-536849-2-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com> <20250909182350.3ab98b64@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:23:09 +0800 Jianbo Liu wrote: > On 9/10/2025 9:23 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:07:04 +0300 Tariq Toukan wrote: > >> + struct net_device *netdev = mlx5_uplink_netdev_get(dev); > >> + struct mlx5e_priv *priv; > >> + int err; > >> + > >> + if (!netdev) > >> + return 0; > > > > Please don't call in variable init functions which require cleanup > > or error checking. > > But in this function, a NULL return from mlx5_uplink_netdev_get is a > valid condition where it should simply return 0. No cleanup or error > check is needed. You have to check if it succeeded, and if so, you need to clean up later. Do no hide meaningful code in variable init.