From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB8F1FE47B for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 02:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757557249; cv=none; b=UsOSI4ma7pCAO9ZbB923j40Hsr+nrmndYyFD3Kd/nexyqIkWITK84VvXYftHb7SMEwlJotIjrxPgbL8wmFoiuFfBSziud3Ti9+LXJMyIIQSrGRPxA5N3I8Weu3SJAOkijGSapmBLcPNAxAm3uy4ZkgdKspVkkTCH7TviBNc5rKU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757557249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y4LGsIt6DW1EPHVwyRegVZy7VlOB2lVS708kYtqKdIs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uS3rdl8oEUsh4VkUQ8dupayOOz2JwvAU4zGDu07uYtA3V4BlLq3LqZqxaiWAAyYiK4q45m9bu3gplSHdG4/0dQkmBS2Q7cyrhUsSzG8VDPz7/FPuhuf9zICKhjwEXLrRTSMLxSDs3aLWu0eh2qj+QkV6+4LuQ0x1hpvlxBX9Nho= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XjunBDWs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XjunBDWs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB247C4CEEB; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 02:20:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757557248; bh=y4LGsIt6DW1EPHVwyRegVZy7VlOB2lVS708kYtqKdIs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XjunBDWstfFX6ceAWcCmGJb0fPDNuWQVYFQXp8VG4ynZHTqr48BQAgHP+9S7JS57E FGWCUIfM2UioYKYWkyjBtVq56lckPWDrXn/Eu+snF5ezIVxAkLeUoFkLdQoGWSkbAh Jlb+ugFByPrnssoA8cQbxCD+ltcHvlC/QCC3HkYb+XXwhRwBPMI1xP3SoUrv4H+G23 nfuC9YE3qa+fD/8ZywumSi1tzo8+y4HrxuHsxqcD+obIpb6dv2mj4EoPIKucAzmyMx sxyJVBeJZv0O9syWCHY/RYerzu181TOMUo6IPxyUWBEKHuqLG5pgj6EaxR/TSES9+W X/RVGTf5ck2IQ== Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 19:20:48 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] wireguard fixes for 6.17-rc6 Message-ID: <20250910192048.75941267@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250910013644.4153708-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> References: <20250910013644.4153708-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:36:40 +0200 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > 1) A general simplification to the way wireguard chooses the next > available cpu, by making use of cpumask_nth(), and covering an edge > case. > > 2) A cleanup to the selftests kconfig. > > 3) A fix to the selftests kconfig so that it actually runs again. These don't really seem 6.17-worthy TBH. Do you care deeply or can we push these to -next?