From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Yaroslav Kolomiiets <yrk@meta.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] broadcom: report the supported flags for ancillary features
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:04:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250919170445.45803d42@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918-jk-fix-bcm-phy-supported-flags-v1-0-747b60407c9c@intel.com>
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:33:15 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> James Clark reported off list that the broadcom PHY PTP driver was
> incorrectly handling PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST and PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST ioctls since
> the conversion to the .supported_*_flags fields. This series fixes the
> driver to correctly report its flags through the .supported_perout_flags
> and .supported_extts_flags fields. It also contains an update to comment
> the behavior of the PTP_STRICT_FLAGS being always enabled for
> PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2.
James, would you be willing to test and send an official Tested-by tag?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-20 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 0:33 [PATCH net 0/3] broadcom: report the supported flags for ancillary features Jacob Keller
2025-09-19 0:33 ` [PATCH net 1/3] broadcom: fix support for PTP_PEROUT_DUTY_CYCLE Jacob Keller
2025-09-19 11:02 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-19 0:33 ` [PATCH net 2/3] broadcom: fix support for PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2 ioctl Jacob Keller
2025-09-19 11:03 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-19 0:33 ` [PATCH net 3/3] ptp: document behavior of PTP_STRICT_FLAGS Jacob Keller
2025-09-19 11:04 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-19 2:56 ` [PATCH net 0/3] broadcom: report the supported flags for ancillary features Richard Cochran
2025-09-19 8:39 ` Kory Maincent
2025-09-20 0:04 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-09-21 1:26 ` James Clark
2025-09-22 19:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250919170445.45803d42@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jjc@jclark.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=yrk@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).