From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
eperezma@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org,
leiyang@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/8] TUN & TAP: Provide ptr_ring_consume_batched wrappers for vhost_net
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 12:23:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923122147-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250922221553.47802-6-simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:15:50AM +0200, Simon Schippers wrote:
> The wrappers tun_ring_consume_batched/tap_ring_consume_batched are similar
> to the wrappers tun_ring_consume/tap_ring_consume. They deal with
> consuming a batch of entries of the ptr_ring and then waking the
> netdev queue whenever entries get invalidated to be used again by the
> producer.
> To avoid waking the netdev queue when the ptr_ring is full, it is checked
> if the netdev queue is stopped before invalidating entries. Like that the
> netdev queue can be safely woken after invalidating entries.
>
> The READ_ONCE in __ptr_ring_peek, paired with the smp_wmb() in
> __ptr_ring_produce within tun_net_xmit guarantees that the information
> about the netdev queue being stopped is visible after __ptr_ring_peek is
> called.
READ_ONCE generally can't pair with smp_wmb
From Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
SMP BARRIER PAIRING
-------------------
When dealing with CPU-CPU interactions, certain types of memory barrier should
always be paired. A lack of appropriate pairing is almost certainly an error.
....
A write barrier pairs
with an address-dependency barrier, a control dependency, an acquire barrier,
a release barrier, a read barrier, or a general barrier.
> Co-developed-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/tap.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/tun.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/if_tap.h | 6 +++++
> include/linux/if_tun.h | 7 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 119 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
> index f8292721a9d6..651d48612329 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> @@ -1216,6 +1216,58 @@ struct socket *tap_get_socket(struct file *file)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tap_get_socket);
>
> +int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + struct tap_queue *q = file->private_data;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + struct net_device *dev;
> + bool will_invalidate;
> + bool stopped;
> + void *ptr;
> + int i;
> +
> + spin_lock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> + ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&q->ring);
> +
> + if (!ptr) {
> + spin_unlock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + do {
> + /* Check if the queue stopped before zeroing out, so no
> + * ptr get produced in the meantime, because this could
> + * result in waking even though the ptr_ring is full.
> + * The order of the operations is ensured by barrier().
> + */
> + will_invalidate = __ptr_ring_will_invalidate(&q->ring);
> + if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + dev = rcu_dereference(q->tap)->dev;
> + txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, q->queue_index);
> + stopped = netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq);
> + }
> + barrier();
> + __ptr_ring_discard_one(&q->ring, will_invalidate);
> +
> + if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> + if (stopped)
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +
> + array[i++] = ptr;
> + if (i >= n)
> + break;
> + } while ((ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&q->ring)));
> + spin_unlock(&q->ring.consumer_lock);
> +
> + return i;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tap_ring_consume_batched);
> +
> struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *file)
> {
> struct tap_queue *q;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 682df8157b55..7566b22780fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -3759,6 +3759,60 @@ struct socket *tun_get_socket(struct file *file)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_get_socket);
>
> +int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
> + struct netdev_queue *txq;
> + struct net_device *dev;
> + bool will_invalidate;
> + bool stopped;
> + void *ptr;
> + int i;
> +
> + spin_lock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> + ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&tfile->tx_ring);
> +
> + if (!ptr) {
> + spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + i = 0;
> + do {
> + /* Check if the queue stopped before zeroing out, so no
> + * ptr get produced in the meantime, because this could
> + * result in waking even though the ptr_ring is full.
> + * The order of the operations is ensured by barrier().
> + */
> + will_invalidate =
> + __ptr_ring_will_invalidate(&tfile->tx_ring);
> + if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + dev = rcu_dereference(tfile->tun)->dev;
> + txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev,
> + tfile->queue_index);
> + stopped = netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq);
> + }
> + barrier();
> + __ptr_ring_discard_one(&tfile->tx_ring, will_invalidate);
> +
> + if (unlikely(will_invalidate)) {
> + if (stopped)
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +
> + array[i++] = ptr;
> + if (i >= n)
> + break;
> + } while ((ptr = __ptr_ring_peek(&tfile->tx_ring)));
> + spin_unlock(&tfile->tx_ring.consumer_lock);
> +
> + return i;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_ring_consume_batched);
> +
> struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *file)
> {
> struct tun_file *tfile;
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_tap.h b/include/linux/if_tap.h
> index 553552fa635c..2e5542d6aef4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_tap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_tap.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ struct socket;
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TAP)
> struct socket *tap_get_socket(struct file *);
> struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *file);
> +int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file, void **array, int n);
> #else
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> @@ -22,6 +23,11 @@ static inline struct ptr_ring *tap_get_ptr_ring(struct file *f)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> +static inline int tap_ring_consume_batched(struct file *f,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_TAP */
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_tun.h b/include/linux/if_tun.h
> index 80166eb62f41..5b41525ac007 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_tun.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_tun.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct tun_msg_ctl {
> #if defined(CONFIG_TUN) || defined(CONFIG_TUN_MODULE)
> struct socket *tun_get_socket(struct file *);
> struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *file);
> +int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file, void **array, int n);
>
> static inline bool tun_is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
> {
> @@ -55,6 +56,12 @@ static inline struct ptr_ring *tun_get_tx_ring(struct file *f)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> +static inline int tun_ring_consume_batched(struct file *file,
> + void **array, int n)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool tun_is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
> {
> return false;
> --
> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-22 22:15 [PATCH net-next v5 0/8] TUN/TAP & vhost_net: netdev queue flow control to avoid ptr_ring tail drop Simon Schippers
2025-09-22 22:15 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/8] __ptr_ring_full_next: Returns if ring will be full after next insertion Simon Schippers
2025-09-22 22:15 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/8] Move the decision of invalidation out of __ptr_ring_discard_one Simon Schippers
2025-09-22 22:15 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/8] TUN, TAP & vhost_net: Stop netdev queue before reaching a full ptr_ring Simon Schippers
2025-09-23 14:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 5:41 ` Simon Schippers
2025-09-24 5:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-22 22:15 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/8] TUN & TAP: Wake netdev queue after consuming an entry Simon Schippers
2025-09-23 14:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-23 16:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 5:56 ` Simon Schippers
2025-09-24 6:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 7:42 ` Simon Schippers
2025-09-24 7:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 8:40 ` Simon Schippers
2025-09-24 9:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-28 21:27 ` Simon Schippers
2025-09-28 22:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-29 9:43 ` Simon Schippers
2025-10-11 9:15 ` Simon Schippers
2025-09-22 22:15 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/8] TUN & TAP: Provide ptr_ring_consume_batched wrappers for vhost_net Simon Schippers
2025-09-23 16:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2025-09-22 22:15 ` [PATCH net-next v5 6/8] TUN & TAP: Provide ptr_ring_unconsume " Simon Schippers
2025-09-22 22:15 ` [PATCH net-next v5 7/8] TUN & TAP: Methods to determine whether file is TUN/TAP " Simon Schippers
2025-09-22 22:15 ` [PATCH net-next v5 8/8] vhost_net: Replace rx_ring with calls of TUN/TAP wrappers Simon Schippers
2025-09-23 14:14 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-26 13:47 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-23 14:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/8] TUN/TAP & vhost_net: netdev queue flow control to avoid ptr_ring tail drop Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 5:59 ` Simon Schippers
2025-09-24 6:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 7:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 7:33 ` Jason Wang
2025-09-24 7:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 8:08 ` Jason Wang
2025-09-24 8:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-09-24 8:30 ` Jason Wang
2025-09-24 8:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250923122147-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leiyang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon.schippers@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tim.gebauer@tu-dortmund.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).