From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@xilinx.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 4/5] net: macb: single dma_alloc_coherent() for DMA descriptors
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 09:51:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925085154.GW836419@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923-macb-fixes-v6-4-772d655cdeb6@bootlin.com>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Move from 2*NUM_QUEUES dma_alloc_coherent() for DMA descriptor rings to
> 2 calls overall.
>
> Issue is with how all queues share the same register for configuring the
> upper 32-bits of Tx/Rx descriptor rings. Taking Tx, notice how TBQPH
> does *not* depend on the queue index:
>
> #define GEM_TBQP(hw_q) (0x0440 + ((hw_q) << 2))
> #define GEM_TBQPH(hw_q) (0x04C8)
>
> queue_writel(queue, TBQP, lower_32_bits(queue->tx_ring_dma));
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> if (bp->hw_dma_cap & HW_DMA_CAP_64B)
> queue_writel(queue, TBQPH, upper_32_bits(queue->tx_ring_dma));
> #endif
>
> To maximise our chances of getting valid DMA addresses, we do a single
> dma_alloc_coherent() across queues. This improves the odds because
> alloc_pages() guarantees natural alignment. Other codepaths (IOMMU or
> dev/arch dma_map_ops) don't give high enough guarantees
> (even page-aligned isn't enough).
>
> Two consideration:
>
> - dma_alloc_coherent() gives us page alignment. Here we remove this
> constraint meaning each queue's ring won't be page-aligned anymore.
>
> - This can save some tiny amounts of memory. Fewer allocations means
> (1) less overhead (constant cost per alloc) and (2) less wasted bytes
> due to alignment constraints.
>
> Example for (2): 4 queues, default ring size (512), 64-bit DMA
> descriptors, 16K pages:
> - Before: 8 allocs of 8K, each rounded to 16K => 64K wasted.
> - After: 2 allocs of 32K => 0K wasted.
>
> Fixes: 02c958dd3446 ("net/macb: add TX multiqueue support for gem")
> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> # on sam9x75
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 16:00 [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes Théo Lebrun
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 1/5] dt-bindings: net: cdns,macb: allow tsu_clk without tx_clk Théo Lebrun
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 2/5] net: macb: remove illusion about TBQPH/RBQPH being per-queue Théo Lebrun
2025-09-25 8:49 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 3/5] net: macb: move ring size computation to functions Théo Lebrun
2025-09-25 8:51 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 4/5] net: macb: single dma_alloc_coherent() for DMA descriptors Théo Lebrun
2025-09-25 8:51 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 5/5] net: macb: avoid dealing with endianness in macb_set_hwaddr() Théo Lebrun
2025-09-25 8:52 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-26 7:56 ` [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes Théo Lebrun
2025-09-26 20:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-14 15:38 ` Théo Lebrun
2025-09-27 1:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-27 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925085154.GW836419@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=harini.katakam@xilinx.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).