From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83D46182B4 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 06:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758782909; cv=none; b=SosTtOyj4V/7Vf666SC94hakSekesliFEtTTITdnPbdFrftG6t3f/SauVbijZdkd/lMpJuhtYpZFpAfMpJefqGK8WyxIaiFLa7QIA5ApY5jWqJUXDFAFMW8k3qSz8SkPYlTHEfIVsJWFg1MGieA0Wschtzvg/wmd+mykRpjItCk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758782909; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/Jh9narK//Vdct6harcwA5oRwFRD6C/h9Pvtm7ja7UI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=r7++DlRgpUFGz3sxDHeh8MVNoXZF9ozMYRHi12Ff1YxisqleGB8org4SZNNlAA0KSdqY86KM9nHASE/ASic1QbkyAEJhm7iR2F7gWM5yVZbDl/wXk5blNpvCeBIeWp2g/QBCj5xeNd9lz71NgB1U1JfAov7UC6/4CNCkb/hHZU0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TGYesiqm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TGYesiqm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1758782908; x=1790318908; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/Jh9narK//Vdct6harcwA5oRwFRD6C/h9Pvtm7ja7UI=; b=TGYesiqmEDGqbMtrh3rI5tjrJQStiy+LXm73ZrUkZTP4anpSk3quje81 QOPgDBSHa/SJJ4FsjTOhK6jligCWT1zF+zppHus24ijadCJwKm1tsK4d4 PngO6HrWyDV/4h/AwfcAdHk7zs4VR0DBPoZdl/EcHjVwIo/uKUoK3JGCB PwMMO3I6jd3Iy+scliDOI2gPh0r2oibLvEtov+lMZT11PLNNn/NWVh47d eNR1kX6IJjFLykw/1XjSHt5Qr8X4sV4Kjrj6ELu5U/gCtE86rrlfrrvLQ eX85/0qQ5CIyyjWxeIq4NsJCUQbm3Z8FkrZ2V4d+UMrIUTodY/wq8wgxo Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 22fAunL4RB2Yk5657G5/Jg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8JDbO5iJRxaVX4dcPMdP4Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11563"; a="72520225" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,292,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="72520225" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2025 23:48:27 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0laVTdjgR/O9U2gJbq7RfA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6hCP+bN0SLe9K0FCbDqTvg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,292,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="208185905" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 84c55410ccf6) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2025 23:48:23 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 84c55410ccf6 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1v1fm8-0004zj-31; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 06:48:20 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:48:16 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Daniel Zahka , Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn , Breno Leitao , Petr Machata , Yuyang Huang , Xiao Liang , Carolina Jubran , Donald Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/9] netdevsim: a basic test PSP implementation Message-ID: <202509251404.crckqEdD-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250924194959.2845473-2-daniel.zahka@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250924194959.2845473-2-daniel.zahka@gmail.com> Hi Daniel, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Daniel-Zahka/netdevsim-a-basic-test-PSP-implementation/20250925-035305 base: net-next/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250924194959.2845473-2-daniel.zahka%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH net-next 1/9] netdevsim: a basic test PSP implementation config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20250925 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250925/202509251404.crckqEdD-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250925/202509251404.crckqEdD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509251404.crckqEdD-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c: In function 'nsim_forward_skb': >> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c:116:36: error: 'SKB_EXT_PSP' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'SKB_EXT_NUM'? 116 | __skb_ext_set(skb, SKB_EXT_PSP, psp_ext); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ | SKB_EXT_NUM drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c:116:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in vim +116 drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c 102 103 static int nsim_forward_skb(struct net_device *tx_dev, 104 struct net_device *rx_dev, 105 struct sk_buff *skb, 106 struct nsim_rq *rq, 107 struct skb_ext *psp_ext) 108 { 109 int ret; 110 111 ret = __dev_forward_skb(rx_dev, skb); 112 if (ret) 113 return ret; 114 115 if (psp_ext) > 116 __skb_ext_set(skb, SKB_EXT_PSP, psp_ext); 117 118 return nsim_napi_rx(tx_dev, rx_dev, rq, skb); 119 } 120 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki