netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux.dev, Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 nf-next 1/3] netfilter: utils: nf_checksum(_partial) correct data!=networkheader
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 20:30:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925183043.114660-2-ericwouds@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925183043.114660-1-ericwouds@gmail.com>

In the conntrack hook it may not always be the case that:
skb_network_header(skb) == skb->data, i.e. skb_network_offset(skb)
is zero.

This is problematic when L4 function nf_conntrack_handle_packet()
is accessing L3 data. This function uses thoff and ip_hdr()
to finds it's data. But it also calculates the checksum.
nf_checksum() and nf_checksum_partial() both use lower skb-checksum
functions that are based on using skb->data.

Adjust for skb_network_offset(skb), so that the checksum is calculated
correctly.

Signed-off-by: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
---
 net/netfilter/utils.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/utils.c b/net/netfilter/utils.c
index 008419db815a..7b33fe63c5fa 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/utils.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/utils.c
@@ -124,16 +124,25 @@ __sum16 nf_checksum(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int hook,
 		    unsigned int dataoff, u8 protocol,
 		    unsigned short family)
 {
+	unsigned int nhpull = skb_network_offset(skb);
 	__sum16 csum = 0;
 
+	if (WARN_ON(!skb_pointer_if_linear(skb, nhpull, 0)))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* pull/push because the lower csum functions assume that
+	 * skb_network_offset(skb) is zero.
+	 */
+	__skb_pull(skb, nhpull);
 	switch (family) {
 	case AF_INET:
-		csum = nf_ip_checksum(skb, hook, dataoff, protocol);
+		csum = nf_ip_checksum(skb, hook, dataoff - nhpull, protocol);
 		break;
 	case AF_INET6:
-		csum = nf_ip6_checksum(skb, hook, dataoff, protocol);
+		csum = nf_ip6_checksum(skb, hook, dataoff - nhpull, protocol);
 		break;
 	}
+	__skb_push(skb, nhpull);
 
 	return csum;
 }
@@ -143,18 +152,25 @@ __sum16 nf_checksum_partial(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int hook,
 			    unsigned int dataoff, unsigned int len,
 			    u8 protocol, unsigned short family)
 {
+	unsigned int nhpull = skb_network_offset(skb);
 	__sum16 csum = 0;
 
+	if (WARN_ON(!skb_pointer_if_linear(skb, nhpull, 0)))
+		return 0;
+
+	/* See nf_checksum() */
+	__skb_pull(skb, nhpull);
 	switch (family) {
 	case AF_INET:
-		csum = nf_ip_checksum_partial(skb, hook, dataoff, len,
-					      protocol);
+		csum = nf_ip_checksum_partial(skb, hook, dataoff - nhpull,
+					      len, protocol);
 		break;
 	case AF_INET6:
-		csum = nf_ip6_checksum_partial(skb, hook, dataoff, len,
-					       protocol);
+		csum = nf_ip6_checksum_partial(skb, hook, dataoff - nhpull,
+					       len, protocol);
 		break;
 	}
+	__skb_push(skb, nhpull);
 
 	return csum;
 }
-- 
2.50.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-25 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-25 18:30 [PATCH v15 nf-next 0/3] conntrack: bridge: add double vlan, pppoe and pppoe-in-q Eric Woudstra
2025-09-25 18:30 ` Eric Woudstra [this message]
2025-09-25 18:30 ` [PATCH v15 nf-next 2/3] netfilter: bridge: Add conntrack double vlan and pppoe Eric Woudstra
2025-09-26 14:10   ` Simon Horman
2025-10-02  8:11   ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-25 18:30 ` [PATCH v15 nf-next 3/3] netfilter: nft_chain_filter: Add bridge " Eric Woudstra
2025-10-02  8:25   ` Florian Westphal
2025-10-28 11:43     ` Eric Woudstra
2025-10-30 23:14       ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250925183043.114660-2-ericwouds@gmail.com \
    --to=ericwouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).