From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6805926B0AE; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759254092; cv=none; b=pGGCG15a295nLSHHwfF/V5M4xzy1Hm48Ql/Q1/LAMIif4+5neMJN/muToxopzv82EBHp1SUUJfarO3wr811cGTSEWNQGF0XKHEDfvUPe+//okGRoaZ8V7AMdpGkdJqlc65RwRiL9Obmdko7ofTz+VhvK0NAVE+6Am1lTRJ57xEI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759254092; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+GAiL9WWo8nrQPuPanEEryisnD2Dhz+PKoalgEDD2go=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E51Un5Bb2sC4I4WGnCq5aAfHoBc6cY/g7FeHTbG555SVTgbiVXVJFAwU2Fnn9Ye09UZPh4cLlZSftDMbEaUX6VZWfN8YwiX5tLniTE9V2xM5jc/xNfk2QqnEdc9lQ2LocH+ARtOyNVeSa5uGoOvWmDZU9rw/jYUunxoXVo1c/Wk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N+75qEIn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N+75qEIn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11E12C4CEF0; Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:41:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1759254090; bh=+GAiL9WWo8nrQPuPanEEryisnD2Dhz+PKoalgEDD2go=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=N+75qEInhs//Fd/PRwsQcywfT2xJ2F92dckA/h2rFBE1SQk6u8nB2UkXOCgGUR2SO M61AfxC0n3gJQgSPCuOsBqBQJcxZ0BiYAt5VvCwZbwz4VbKWjem1MASwO86/WzbfzZ MUdw4bvHLyzoPGVFJZjIyyxCb8FaouTNqSQjBEueXb4jFMRfVtf/rD09nGN9p85n3E KOV3ztWIKWR+HefyiRMTgaE601XfNHSlBqnGoTEBdQKtbVGYi5TWlXghVNKdTK3pCJ odG6wq/ERXZZEYd8mhBIarJn/iCuNGOB84QSSmsLKq5ebgITEZaTxOjeN5PgDKVc6Y 01bhMTyRG0U/A== Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:41:29 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Octavian Purdila Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, ahmed.zaki@intel.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, toke@redhat.com, lorenzo@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+ff145014d6b0ce64a173@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Kuniyuki Iwashima Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xdp: use multi-buff only if receive queue supports page pool Message-ID: <20250930104129.20a2aa7e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250924060843.2280499-1-tavip@google.com> <20250924170914.20aac680@kernel.org> <20250925191219.13a29106@kernel.org> <20250926124010.4566617b@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:01:49 -0700 Octavian Purdila wrote: > local_lock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock); > - err = skb_cow_data_for_xdp(this_cpu_read(system_page_pool.pool), pskb, prog); > + pool = this_cpu_read(system_page_pool.pool); > + err = skb_cow_data_for_xdp(pool, pskb, prog); > + rxq->mem.type = MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL; > + rxq->mem.id = pool->xdp_mem_id; > local_unlock_nested_bh(&system_page_pool.bh_lock); Yes, LGTM. I _think_ that only skb_cow_data_for_xdp() has to be under the lock here, but doesn't really matter.