From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: edumazet@google.com, fw@strlen.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, willemb@google.com
Subject: Re: deadlocks on pernet_ops_rwsem
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:26:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251001122618.4cf31f3b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251001185310.33321-1-kuniyu@google.com>
On Wed, 1 Oct 2025 18:50:22 +0000 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 10:22:23 -0700
> > To be clear -- AFAICT lockdep misses this.
> >
> > The splat is from the "stuck task" checker.
> >
> > 2 min wait to load a module during test init would definitely be a sign
> > of something going sideways.. but I think it's worse than that, these
> > time out completely and we kill the VM. I think the modprobe is truly
> > stuck here.
> >
> > In one of the splats lockdep was able to say:
> >
> > [ 4302.448228][ T44] INFO: task modprobe:31634 <writer> blocked on an rw-semaphore likely owned by task kworker/u16:0:12 <reader>
> >
> > but most are more useless:
> >
> > [ 4671.090728][ T44] INFO: task modprobe:2342 is blocked on an rw-semaphore, but the owner is not found.
> >
> > (?!?)
>
> Even when it caught the possible owner, lockdep seems confused :/
>
>
> [ 4302.448228][ T44] INFO: task modprobe:31634 <writer> blocked on an rw-semaphore likely owned by task kworker/u16:0:12 <reader>
>
> modprobe:31634 seems to be blocked by kworker/u16:0:12,
>
>
> [ 4302.449035][ T44] task:kworker/u16:0 state:R running task stack:26368 pid:12 tgid:12 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208060 flags:0x00004000
> [ 4302.449872][ T44] Workqueue: netns cleanup_net
> ...
> [ 4302.460889][ T44] Showing all locks held in the system:
> [ 4302.461368][ T44] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:0/12:
>
> but no lock shows up here for kworker/u16:0/12,
>
>
> [ 4302.461597][ T44] 2 locks held by kworker/u18:0/36:
> [ 4302.461926][ T44] #0: ffff8880010d9d48 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x7e5/0x1650
> [ 4302.462429][ T44] #1: ffffc9000028fd40 ((work_completion)(&sub_info->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0xded/0x1650
> [ 4302.463011][ T44] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/44:
> [ 4302.463261][ T44] #0: ffffffffb7b83f80 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x36/0x260
> [ 4302.463717][ T44] 1 lock held by modprobe/31634:
> [ 4302.463982][ T44] #0: ffffffffb8270430 (pernet_ops_rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: register_pernet_subsys+0x1a/0x40
>
> and modprobe/31634 is holding pernet_ops_rwsem ???
>
>
> Was there any update on packages (especially qemu?) used by
> CI around 2025-09-18 ?
No updates according to the logs. First hit was on Thursday so I thought
maybe it came from Linus. But looking at the branches we fast forwarded
2025-09-18--21-00 and there were 2 hits earlier that day (2025-09-18--03-00,
2025-09-18--15-00)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-01 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-01 15:20 deadlocks on pernet_ops_rwsem Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-01 16:46 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-01 17:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-01 18:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-10-01 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-10-01 19:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-10-01 20:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251001122618.4cf31f3b@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).