netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 02/12] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink_map to failable
Date: Thu,  2 Oct 2025 15:53:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251002225356.1505480-3-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251002225356.1505480-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>

To prepare for changing bpf_local_storage_map_bucket::lock to rqspinlock,
convert bpf_selem_unlink_map() to failable. It still always succeeds and
returns 0 for now.

Since some operations updating local storage cannot fail in the middle,
open-code bpf_selem_unlink_map() to take the b->lock before the
operation. There are two such locations:

- bpf_local_storage_alloc()

  The first selem will be unlinked from smap if cmpxchg owner_storage_ptr
  fails, which should not fail. Therefore, hold b->lock when linking
  until allocation complete. Helpers that assume b->lock is held by
  callers are introduced: bpf_selem_link_map_nolock() and
  bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock().

- bpf_local_storage_update()

  The three step update process: link_map(new_selem),
  link_storage(new_selem), and unlink_map(old_selem) should not fail in
  the middle.

In bpf_selem_unlink(), bpf_selem_unlink_map() and
bpf_selem_unlink_storage() should either all succeed or fail as a whole
instead of failing in the middle. So, return if unlink_map() failed.

In bpf_local_storage_destroy(), since it cannot deadlock with itself or
bpf_local_storage_map_free() who the function might be racing with,
retry if bpf_selem_unlink_map() fails due to rqspinlock returning
errors.

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index e4a7cd33b455..cbccf6b77f10 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ void bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
 	hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->snode, &local_storage->list);
 }
 
-static void bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+static int bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 {
 	struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
 	struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap;
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static void bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 
 	if (unlikely(!selem_linked_to_map_lockless(selem)))
 		/* selem has already be unlinked from smap */
-		return;
+		return 0;
 
 	local_storage = rcu_dereference_check(selem->local_storage,
 					      bpf_rcu_lock_held());
@@ -428,6 +428,14 @@ static void bpf_selem_unlink_map(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
 	if (likely(selem_linked_to_map(selem)))
 		hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem)
+{
+	if (likely(selem_linked_to_map(selem)))
+		hlist_del_init_rcu(&selem->map_node);
 }
 
 void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
@@ -446,13 +454,26 @@ void bpf_selem_link_map(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
 }
 
+static void bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
+				      struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
+				      struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b)
+{
+	RCU_INIT_POINTER(SDATA(selem)->smap, smap);
+	hlist_add_head_rcu(&selem->map_node, &b->list);
+}
+
 void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool reuse_now)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	/* Always unlink from map before unlinking from local_storage
 	 * because selem will be freed after successfully unlinked from
 	 * the local_storage.
 	 */
-	bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+	err = bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+	if (err)
+		return;
+
 	bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, reuse_now);
 }
 
@@ -494,6 +515,8 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
 {
 	struct bpf_local_storage *prev_storage, *storage;
 	struct bpf_local_storage **owner_storage_ptr;
+	struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int err;
 
 	err = mem_charge(smap, owner, sizeof(*storage));
@@ -516,7 +539,10 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
 	storage->owner = owner;
 
 	bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(storage, first_selem);
-	bpf_selem_link_map(smap, first_selem);
+
+	b = select_bucket(smap, storage);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
+	bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(smap, first_selem, b);
 
 	owner_storage_ptr =
 		(struct bpf_local_storage **)owner_storage(smap, owner);
@@ -532,7 +558,8 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
 	 */
 	prev_storage = cmpxchg(owner_storage_ptr, NULL, storage);
 	if (unlikely(prev_storage)) {
-		bpf_selem_unlink_map(first_selem);
+		bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(first_selem);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
 		err = -EAGAIN;
 		goto uncharge;
 
@@ -546,6 +573,7 @@ int bpf_local_storage_alloc(void *owner,
 		 * bucket->list under rcu_read_lock().
 		 */
 	}
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -567,8 +595,9 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 	struct bpf_local_storage_data *old_sdata = NULL;
 	struct bpf_local_storage_elem *alloc_selem, *selem = NULL;
 	struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
+	struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket *b;
 	HLIST_HEAD(old_selem_free_list);
-	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long flags, b_flags;
 	int err;
 
 	/* BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST cannot be both set */
@@ -652,20 +681,26 @@ bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
 		goto unlock;
 	}
 
+	b = select_bucket(smap, local_storage);
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, b_flags);
+
 	alloc_selem = NULL;
 	/* First, link the new selem to the map */
-	bpf_selem_link_map(smap, selem);
+	bpf_selem_link_map_nolock(smap, selem, b);
 
 	/* Second, link (and publish) the new selem to local_storage */
 	bpf_selem_link_storage_nolock(local_storage, selem);
 
 	/* Third, remove old selem, SELEM(old_sdata) */
 	if (old_sdata) {
-		bpf_selem_unlink_map(SELEM(old_sdata));
+		bpf_selem_unlink_map_nolock(SELEM(old_sdata));
 		bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(local_storage, SELEM(old_sdata),
 						true, &old_selem_free_list);
 	}
 
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, b_flags);
+
 unlock:
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local_storage->lock, flags);
 	bpf_selem_free_list(&old_selem_free_list, false);
@@ -743,6 +778,7 @@ void bpf_local_storage_destroy(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage)
 	HLIST_HEAD(free_selem_list);
 	struct hlist_node *n;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int err;
 
 	storage_smap = rcu_dereference_check(local_storage->smap, bpf_rcu_lock_held());
 	bpf_ma = check_storage_bpf_ma(local_storage, storage_smap, NULL);
@@ -761,7 +797,7 @@ void bpf_local_storage_destroy(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage)
 		/* Always unlink from map before unlinking from
 		 * local_storage.
 		 */
-		bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
+		while (bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem));
 		/* If local_storage list has only one element, the
 		 * bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock() will return true.
 		 * Otherwise, it will return false. The current loop iteration
-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-02 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-02 22:53 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 00/12] Remove task and cgroup local storage percpu counters Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 01/12] bpf: Select bpf_local_storage_map_bucket based on bpf_local_storage Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 03/12] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_link_map to failable Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 04/12] bpf: Open code bpf_selem_unlink_storage in bpf_selem_unlink Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 05/12] bpf: Convert bpf_selem_unlink to failable Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 06/12] bpf: Change local_storage->lock and b->lock to rqspinlock Amery Hung
2025-10-02 23:37   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-03 22:03     ` Amery Hung
2025-10-06 17:58       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-06 20:19         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 07/12] bpf: Remove task local storage percpu counter Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 08/12] bpf: Remove cgroup " Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 09/12] bpf: Remove unused percpu counter from bpf_local_storage_map_free Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 10/12] selftests/bpf: Update task_local_storage/recursion test Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 11/12] selftests/bpf: Remove test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup Amery Hung
2025-10-02 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 12/12] selftests/bpf: Choose another percpu variable in bpf for btf_dump test Amery Hung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251002225356.1505480-3-ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).