From: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@baidu.com>
To: <Jason@zx2c4.com>, <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@baidu.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu()
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2025 21:39:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251005133936.32667-1-wangfushuai@baidu.com> (raw)
Replace call_rcu() + kmem_cache_free() with kfree_rcu() to simplify
the code and reduce function size.
Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang <wangfushuai@baidu.com>
---
drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
index 09f7fcd7da78..5ece9acad64d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c
@@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ static void push_rcu(struct allowedips_node **stack,
}
}
-static void node_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
-{
- kmem_cache_free(node_cache, container_of(rcu, struct allowedips_node, rcu));
-}
-
static void root_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
struct allowedips_node *node, *stack[MAX_ALLOWEDIPS_DEPTH] = {
@@ -271,13 +266,13 @@ static void remove_node(struct allowedips_node *node, struct mutex *lock)
if (free_parent)
child = rcu_dereference_protected(parent->bit[!(node->parent_bit_packed & 1)],
lockdep_is_held(lock));
- call_rcu(&node->rcu, node_free_rcu);
+ kfree_rcu(node, rcu);
if (!free_parent)
return;
if (child)
child->parent_bit_packed = parent->parent_bit_packed;
*(struct allowedips_node **)(parent->parent_bit_packed & ~3UL) = child;
- call_rcu(&parent->rcu, node_free_rcu);
+ kfree_rcu(parent, rcu);
}
static int remove(struct allowedips_node __rcu **trie, u8 bits, const u8 *key,
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-05 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-05 13:39 Fushuai Wang [this message]
2025-10-07 12:55 ` [PATCH v2] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() Paolo Abeni
2026-01-12 3:10 ` Fushuai Wang
2026-01-12 11:41 ` Vadim Fedorenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251005133936.32667-1-wangfushuai@baidu.com \
--to=wangfushuai@baidu.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox