From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F3A2226863 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760461499; cv=none; b=jkW9/khO340JRbduPQMmnOrA+Mfgh7LyZ1q4NNeRNaIjfy6BNiUUgOduXHBqWnKVdgEXhnw1xq8KqPB+5IWskKV41hy6z8r6RMsX3Rl66CZcs+0n1uHPMOPUXLOjUNLAAKufUbkB2+R1nLYdE2Vm0pGstkbW46DjEvpdmW+Gyr4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760461499; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zR4mj2V8xlY6/bkgaX0KeLu9NGXdt0uBdeyroBZnuXA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FXxPvUSATUiuPllXGw+hRos/nxNZoxcjphtF0HRC71jkzQT70NP/w5rBeIiUeB9pYAO0/TycXMhGE0mfs6lu6RZlxXoJrUk3qET+xnmzqIwQvCbv9yE6BKczWgB01GFhqV/YYVwkmo+YEMK79/Yblkc+/0nTIeDmwOljhp31hR4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TFyoYh9o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TFyoYh9o" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 458A5C4CEE7; Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:04:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1760461498; bh=zR4mj2V8xlY6/bkgaX0KeLu9NGXdt0uBdeyroBZnuXA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TFyoYh9o1mQ5kRzm/lKPzZS2fjgxXcSn1Nnr/oXwplmENuJsQ+unynLLSU53rtYdL fAIcSo1h9oE85Jn9xsptxcJlQMdKWMvYCqYTCka57w5BqgLpeBa+d1sT3b4Rkllj0e DaiXXRkC6PdSyHDUdgLtPCWxVmemEQ6h+DYZV2p7JZf7iI930fNlfEj316TfVyGAhm LUjFzZr0a1iKMjZkwq8vjcOtWFPxNmWCeW0XfgV+hurQL2dga+fuhYRTXIDXauS8Uv N5flbSPxy8AHQXimgfErnfv+DD7BXSOZ9iU+d/FMlC0oUf9whZq75iglUtwQ8O6Yes ZMip35fh/+gdg== Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:04:57 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Paolo Abeni , "David S . Miller" , Simon Horman , Neal Cardwell , Willem de Bruijn , Kuniyuki Iwashima , netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: better handle TCP_TX_DELAY on established flows Message-ID: <20251014100457.3f6de3e0@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20251013145926.833198-1-edumazet@google.com> <3b20bfde-1a99-4018-a8d9-bb7323b33285@redhat.com> <20251014090629.7373baa7@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:16:23 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 9:06=E2=80=AFAM Jakub Kicinski = wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 02:40:39 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote: =20 > > > Or add a best effort, so that TCP can have some clue, vast majority of > > > cases is that the batch is 1 skb :) =20 > > > > FWIW I don't see an official submission and CI is quite behind > > so I'll set the test to ignored for now. =20 >=20 > You mean this TCP_TX_DELAY patch ? Or the series ? >=20 > I will send V2 of the series soon. (I added the test unflake in it) Great, I wasn't clear whether you'll send a separate fix or v2. So I disabled the test itself.=20 Not the patches, patches are still queued.=20 Sorry for the confusion, our CI is what it is - just carry on as normal and I'll try to keep up.