From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8309238C1F; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 23:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761004430; cv=none; b=ZVeJExwePiimRihsFFRPXMIpsPFdWoxiV9uOo3fEjJNkfk4gHHqweRJ3x32O9ujwLxdlSD6/+mMYvxhfX0/YFprPSxkuo28aLMCbn5jIOFLL+GiSWz2bFZclIAz05udLC3LI2Eg69Cwpv5SVGpUKnwb7hLlGzdLGjtMbLY+DL8g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761004430; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QnBcUs+LxaiGrX+ZfWPM2gKJapapQgzwF2K0+kBGOq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Lyvt7OHbEeim5GTlbEbzJ46i2Pi9pS0embZ8G3qCWUUACeNHx+H0W0u8jncqfLAjsQqS/Qbg9i5m9zedLmuyylvmEa+Xt0zKrOV/3VeJuNtSG1va/T57aztiY115SXYE6Nxllo3Yza86LKJdkdxdbL2tp42Fxp50nc+xENL/KlA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X4WNqzCz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X4WNqzCz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D809CC4CEFB; Mon, 20 Oct 2025 23:53:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761004428; bh=QnBcUs+LxaiGrX+ZfWPM2gKJapapQgzwF2K0+kBGOq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=X4WNqzCzcVQZ9GBpnd8DabQwfzn1yNMhqjxHF7RZqmO+RT2xt3ZMPMQM51KhG2fqA qPrUfIrOth1zWV4U28M4g6g0QpkpmduQNeOGR0kr46Gj9JIX8omDa+sNZRqhPMOmQF i61oYOVRAYG74McTgVkWgYPGVoipPSDqG6eDulaX0WdgZw0DxuLmJc1bWDXbd/T3IJ TM6KqDzJw8DqMnpkbPAMf4vkECxDKbRicanGFHpTMqhAD7H3mEqJAQy2XZy3FuWtLC F84FxjAyQCiW7rxeMIiNAve1Hrdshw9sPjEdDuMpZYFPEP4AX9Qph4ykTpQVK00Yie N4qw1G2tF4JYg== Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:53:46 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Cc: Horatiu Vultur , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4 2/2] phy: mscc: Fix PTP for VSC8574 and VSC8572 Message-ID: <20251020165346.276cd17e@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251017064819.3048793-3-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> References: <20251017064819.3048793-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <20251017064819.3048793-3-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:48:19 +0200 Horatiu Vultur wrote: > For VSC8574 and VSC8572, the PTP initialization is incomplete. It is > missing the first part but it makes the second part. Meaning that the > ptp_clock_register() is never called. > > There is no crash without the first part when enabling PTP but this is > unexpected because some PHys have PTP functionality exposed by the > driver and some don't even though they share the same PTP clock PTP. I'm tempted to queue this to net-next, sounds like a "never worked in an obvious way" case. I'd appreciate a second opinion.. Andrew?