From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966881A08A3; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761096774; cv=none; b=RLlPRbvIFtgIkKXwX53iNKMjuv3XtGPQTjmSA+qdMgUrwiYJ4DxObuTJvni8dj5uKuDu9Zxj46tjedaHdVOKHLIW4tQGP74f3dmjyFN7dg0K2OKxKV/0/vCIVigR/IqUNBjY4nVaJVC9sWRB3M0QZC91Cg3IvRf8C5EOMBXVrF0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761096774; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6coOt8FIoqzl/Uho4X9/XmZXp+oC+jOkvyjgoiD4n6c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RFT6eCx4GFU0TNaQHvvcWirmOV4159qbJBHgVCSn7heAANkkz9hewMoTFlJleTkXjSn38JGN6y6oZpbl3Zk1N1nZgF+p55kEt23MYNFGBl2SYb2p3BoMk+3XkGZEf94PmkqazwafxMDVqYITaEsyfxtLdCz0AYdtbYNriXuZsjM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SmPNbj60; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SmPNbj60" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73DF3C4CEF1; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 01:32:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761096774; bh=6coOt8FIoqzl/Uho4X9/XmZXp+oC+jOkvyjgoiD4n6c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SmPNbj60FBOjdLDnoXng9UYkklb2n9TteJbBDQJogsuYY9/cedQyP0oAcBhKJ2kmT GvKZNMn7O2FCgmW5ZjxEXMmGSFFT2KuyysZLyXaX2bkgbxCdAkglt2ys8D584bHlR5 tJ4mO0IAKhcv5PXhU0lBjcIN+VvbzhiIwsZf3vXqRkKTvXgPYLWpqdjQkpCW15piOM GStV9gniznbPGvaTtdQseKkMR7sZF6FmjMCdOfNAsJFXM5H8vcJvYSd/YTbtR/eFBP lmOYcIcnw7ShqjnuLA66REItJ7f5QvGWqn/uvi8UqDWJpLxJzmF5+wrx4JYbvPe3O4 J9xE74KZ17NLA== Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 18:32:52 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Lizhi Xu Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] usbnet: Prevents free active kevent Message-ID: <20251021183252.2eb25aac@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251018144940.583693-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com> References: <20251018144940.583693-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 22:49:40 +0800 Lizhi Xu wrote: > --- a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c > @@ -1672,6 +1672,9 @@ void usbnet_disconnect (struct usb_interface *intf) > usb_free_urb(dev->interrupt); > kfree(dev->padding_pkt); > > + cancel_work_sync(&dev->kevent); > + timer_delete_sync(&dev->delay); > + > free_netdev(net); Is this the best spot to place the cancel? I think it may be better right after unregister_netdev(). I haven't analyze this driver too closely but for example since kevent may call the sub-driver having it running after we already called dev->driver_info->unbind() seems risky. -- pw-bot: cr