netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>,
	Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2@huawei.com>,
	Oscar Maes <oscmaes92@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: vlan: sync VLAN features with lower device
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 06:55:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251023065517.2d3dfca0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38605efc-32f5-4c78-a628-11f8f07668f0@redhat.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:39:07 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > @@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ int register_vlan_dev(struct net_device *dev, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >  	vlan_group_set_device(grp, vlan->vlan_proto, vlan_id, dev);
> >  	grp->nr_vlan_devs++;
> >  
> > +	netdev_change_features(dev);  
> 
> Is this just for NETIF_F_LRO? it feels a bit overkill for single flag.
> Also, why netdev_change_features() (vs netdev_update_features())?

Another thought -- isn't this a problem for more uppers?
Isn't this what all callers of netdev_upper_dev_link() effectively
need, and therefore perhaps we should stick it somewhere in the core
(netdev_upper_dev_link() itself or when device is registered) ?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-23 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-21  9:56 [PATCH net] net: vlan: sync VLAN features with lower device Hangbin Liu
2025-10-23 13:39 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-23 13:55   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-10-23 14:57     ` Hangbin Liu
2025-10-23 14:17   ` Hangbin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251023065517.2d3dfca0@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dongchenchen2@huawei.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@treblig.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oscmaes92@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).